According to previous studies, sick euthyroid syndrome (SES) is the most common endocrine disorder in critically ill patients (
1). In our study, 77.14% of the critically ill children on the first day and 100% of the patients on the third day of admission showed some evidence of sick euthyroid syndrome.
As shown by Galusova et al., evaluation of thyroid hormones serially on days 1, 2, 3, and 7 is more valuable than a one-time measurement (
16). Accordingly, in our study, evaluation of thyroid function tests (TFT) on the third day of admission seemed to be more valuable than TFT on the first day in predicting disease outcome. That is because TFT on the third day showed more variation compared to the TFT on the first day and was associated with illness severity based on PELOD-72. So that patients with higher PELOD-72 scores had greater thyroid dysfunction (notably TT3 and FT3 level on the third day), while this correlation was less observed between TFT on the first day of admission and the illness severity on the same day based on PELOD-24 (only at the TT3 level on the first day).
In previous studies the decrease in TT3 levels was the most common form of the sick euthyroid syndrome (
3), in our study also, most patients had low TT3 levels on the first day of admission.
Since there was a significant reduction in mean TT3 levels on the first day of admission and mean TT4 levels on the third day of admission in survivors compared to non-survivors, it can be concluded that in assessing thyroid function on the first day of admission, TT3 levels and the third day of admission, TT4 levels would be better predictors of outcome or survival rate. In a study by Van den Berghe et al. also, it has been shown that TT4 levels may decrease during the prolonged phase of an illness compared to the acute phase (
17).
In the present study, illness severity on the first day correlated with lower TT3 levels as well as lower FT3 and TT3 on the third day of admission. In contrast, in a study by Maldonado et al., only TT4 levels associated with illness severity and could be considered as a prognostic factor (
18). However, there are controversial results in the literature regarding parameters related to thyroid function and prognosis (
19-
21).
Meyer et al. showed that FT3 and TT3 levels were not associated with prognosis in the acute phase of a disease (
22), while in the study of Ture et al., there was a significant difference between FT3 levels in survivors and non-survivors (
23). Additionally, as shown in a study by F Wang et al., FT3 was the most powerful and the only independent predictor of ICU mortality amongst the other thyroid function indicators (
24). However, most studies have been conducted on adult patients that are physiologically different from children. A systematic review of the literature on children and adolescents with a history of septic shock showed that there is a correlation between thyroid function impairment in critically ill patients and the disease outcome (
25).
In our study, mean TSH levels on the first and the third day of admission, in spite of changes in other components of the thyroid function tests, were within the normal range, and therefore confirmed the euthyroid state in hospitalized patients. It has been shown that TSH may increase in the acute phase of the disease and return to normal levels during the course of an illness. However, in case of decreased thyroid hormones, normal levels of TSH are considered abnormal (
26). In a study by Peeters et al., rT3 was reported as a predictor of patients’ survival (
27), while in our study, mean rT3 levels were within normal ranges and there was no significant difference between rT3 levels in survivors and non-survivors.
Considering the correlation between PELOD-72 and the level of TT3, TT4, and FT4 on the first day of admission, it can be concluded that lower levels of TT3, TT4, and FT4 on the first day of admission could be a warning for the worse course of the illness on the third day of admission.
In this study, also, we did not find any significant difference in free thyroid hormone levels including FT3 and FT4 on the first and the third days of admission between survivors and non-survivors. This may be justified by the mechanism of the sick euthyroid syndrome, as described previously. On the other hand, the effectiveness of thyroid hormone replacement in critically ill patients with sick euthyroid syndrome still remains controversial (
26). It has been shown that thyroid hormone replacement had no benefit and did not change the outcome in critically ill patients (
28-
30). In contrast, in a study by Bettendorf et al., it was revealed that treatment of children with tri-iodothyronine after cardiopulmonary bypass operations reduced the need for postoperative intensive care (
31). Based on the results of our study, insignificant differences in levels of free thyroid hormones on the first and third days of admission in survivors and non-survivors suggest that replacement of thyroid hormones in these patients may not have an effect on the disease outcome. In other words, although free thyroid hormones may be reduced in the course of a critical illness, it seems that low levels of FT3 and FT4 are still sufficient to maintain cell function.
Regarding the limitations of our study, it should be noticed that this study was conducted only on the patients who were not treated with the drugs affecting Hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis (
32). Since many patients admitted to intensive care units receive dopamine due to various reasons, including hemodynamic instability, results of this study cannot be generalized to all patients admitted to PICUs.
4.1. Conclusion
Based on the results of our study, low TT3 is the most common form of SES in critically ill children. Thyroid function assessment, especially TT3 on the first day and TT4 on the third day of admission along with PELOD score, might be helpful in predicting disease outcome and patient’s survival.