4.1. Advertising Representation of the Centers
In the second phase of the study, November 2012, the number of newspapers that published ads, including the ads of DAT centers, decreased from four newspapers in May 2009 to two newspapers (Hamshahri and Keyhan) in Tehran. Generally, based on the newspapers formal information on their advertising costs, 99 centers paid 406,974,030 Rials (from 2010 to 2013, Iran suffered from severe sanctions by the United Nations, Europe, and the United States, due to its nuclear program. Therefore, the total inflation rate rose to 86.7% in three years (21.5% inflation rate in 2010, about 30.5% in 2011, and 34.7% in 2013). Also, the exchange rate of Iran Rials to US Dollar increased from 11,000 Rials to about 32,000 Rials for US$1 (
12). Thus, to find the increasing-decreasing rates of prices, Iran Rials was worked on, paid by Iranians) (US$12,718) for 1343 newspaper ads in November 2012. Also, on average, each center published 13.57 ads, which cost 4,110,840.8 Rials (US$128.46), and each ad cost about 303,030.3 Rials (US$9.4).
In addition, 1343 newspaper ads of the centers were made from 122 ads, repeated daily, and each ad typically covered 6.51 cm
2 of the newspapers pages. About 93% of them were in grayscale and only 7% of the ads were colored. In addition, 83% of the advertisers used a stereotype to advertise their services and centers based on the findings, and just 17% of the centers used more than one advertising type (
Table 2).
| Variables | Sum | Valuea |
|---|
| Advertising cost for clinic, Rial | 406,974,030 | 4110840.8 ± 591299 |
| Number of ads per month | 1343 | 13.57 ± 11.01 |
| Printed area of the ad in month, cm2 | 644.08 | 6.51 ± 3.6 |
| Number of ads types per month | 122 | 1.23 ± 0.52 |
| Colored ad | 8 | 7 |
| Grayscale ad | 114 | 93 |
| Clinics with more than one ad type | 17 | 17 |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD or percentage.
4.1.1. Introducing the Center
Through newspaper ads, centers introduced themselves through six main codes: branding information, treatment type, clinical team, center facilities, permission source, and financial issues.
Nonetheless, similar to the previous study results in 2009 (
8), the most important part of this introduction was branding information, including the center name, physician name, address, office phone, and cell phone number.
Generally, 92% of the advertisers called themselves as outpatient DAT clinics and 6% of them were residential on inpatient treatment centers. Besides, 86% of the ads mentioned the name of centers, 98% indicated the office phone numbers, 62% included the address of centers, and 47% mentioned cell phone numbers as their contact information.
Although in May 2009 about 33% of the ads indicated a physician’s name as one of the most important advertising elements, the importance of this item seems to decrease in the social identity of the DAT centers, and only 10% of advertisers in November 2012 used it. The priority of Governmental License increased for the centers, as it was mentioned by 100% of the centers in 2012, compared to 38% in 2009. In November 2012, about 18% of the centers indicated State Welfare Organization License title, code, or both in their ads, but 86% of the clinics highlighted their licenses issued by Ministry of Health in their ads.
Furthermore, the facilities and advantages of centers were advertised by 41% of them through three themes. About one-fifth of the centers pointed to the working time through two codes: day and night (19%) and 24 hours (2%). In addition, the advertisers used three adjective codes of specialized (15%) (having proficiency in drug treatment), calm and relaxing (3%), and healthy (1%) to describe the facilities of their centers.
Besides, the priority of mentioning the members of the medical team was emphasized to attract audience, as 10% of the advertisers pointed to their psychiatrists and 3% indicated the involvement of psychologists in their medical team. Also, a center presented its clinical team as experienced. However, in 2009, only two (3%) centers pointed to their social working team and four (6%) clinics highlighted their psychiatry experts. Meanwhile, the importance of social workers decreased in the field, as none of the ads indicated them during the second one-month research period. Unlike May 2009 study, the frequency of official price code declined and only one ad pointed to it. However, the centers stated some other financial codes, such as insurance (4%), discount (1%), and lowest cost (8%) (
Table 3).
| Variebles | No. (%) |
|---|
| Center facilities | |
| Admission capacity | 1 (1) |
| Day and night | 19 (19) |
| 24 hours | 2 (2) |
| Specialized | 15 (15) |
| Healthy condition | 1 (1) |
| Calm and relaxing environment | 3 (3) |
| Center type | |
| Outpatient | 91 (92) |
| Inpatient | 6 (6) |
| Branding information | |
| Cell phone number | 47 (47) |
| Office phone number | 97 (98) |
| Address | 61 (62) |
| Physician name | 10 (10) |
| DAT center name | 85 (86) |
| Financial issue | |
| Good offers | 1 (1) |
| Discount | 1 (1) |
| Lowest cost | 8 (8) |
| Prices | 1 (1) |
| Insurance | 4 (4) |
| Licensing organization | |
| License code of Ministry of Health | 85 (86) |
| Ministry of Health | 16 (16) |
| License code of State Welfare Organization | 10 (10) |
| Social Welfare Organization | 8 (8) |
| Clinical team | |
| Experienced clinical team | 1 (1) |
| Social worker | 0 (0) |
| Psychologist | 3 (3) |
| Psychiatrist | 10 (10) |
| Treatment advantageous | |
| Craving treatment | 0 (0) |
| Without withdrawal pain | 1 (1) |
| Without side effects | 0 (0) |
| Aftercare services | |
| Rehabilitation | 1 (1) |
| Follow-up | 1 (1) |
| Relapse prevention | 1 (1) |
| Treatment duration | |
| Gradual | 0 (0) |
| Long-term | 5 (5) |
| Short-term | 6 (6) |
| Just one day | 0 (0) |
| Ultra-rapid | 0 (0) |
| Rapid | 1 (1) |
| Treatment setting | |
| Outpatient | 9 (9) |
| Inpatient | 7 (7) |
| Drug | |
| Other drugs | 5 (5) |
| Opiates drugs | 18 (18) |
| Stimulant drugs | 29 (29) |
| Medicine | |
| New medicines | 13 (13) |
| Naltrexone | 0 (0) |
| Methadone | 52 (53) |
| Buprenorphine | 34 (34) |
4.1.2. Treatment Types
Although 79% of the advertisers used a general code, addiction treatment, only 34% of the ads clearly defined the DAT center menu including maintenance, detoxification, or outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for stimulant use disorders based on the matrix model (
11). A comparison between the two periods indicated a decrease in the detoxification treatment, as the previous dominant treatment type. In May 2009, about 66% of the ads pointed to detoxification in their treatment menus, but in November 2012, it decreased to 20%. Furthermore, there was a new emerging code in the treatment menus, matrix (8%), which related to treatment of stimulants addiction.
4.1.3. Treatment Features
In the ads of centers, DAT features were stated in four themes: treatment setting (16%), treatment duration (12%), treatment advantages (1%), and “aftercare services and outcomes” (3%).
In both study phases, 16 advertisers pointed to the treatment setting, including inpatient (
7) and outpatient treatments (
11). Although only 12% of the ads mentioned it on their treatments representation (three codes), it was indicated by 68% of the ads in May 2009 (six codes). The treatment duration in the ads of centers comprised two categories: long-term and short-term. However, 7% of the centers advertised their short-term treatments by two codes, rapid (1%) and short-term (6%). Nonetheless, they used just one code, long-term (5%), to represent their maintenance treatments. Also, similar to the previous phase, there was little difference between the frequency rates of these two categories.
Furthermore, only one clinic pointed out the treatment advantages as a treatment without withdrawal and pain. Besides, three advertisers assured their audience that the treatment process was followed by aftercare services, including follow-up (1%), rehabilitation (1%), and relapse prevention (1%). However, treatment advantages were mentioned by 30% of the ads in May 2009.
A comparison between ads in the two time periods with regard to drug treatment features showed that such features declined from its dominant position in May 2009, i.e., from 100% of the ads to one-third of them in November 2012. In other words, the importance of treatment features decreased to attract patients to the clinics compared to other factors (
Table 3).
4.1.4. Psychological Services
Approximately 36% of the advertisers mentioned their psychological services. Also, 13% of the centers introduced their psychological team in the advertisements. Besides, similar to the previous study, the majority of the ads used a general code, i.e., consultation (22%), and about 14% applied two rather detailed codes, i.e., couple therapy (8%) and group therapy (6%).
4.1.5. Drugs and Medicines Representation
One of the most important features in drug treatment centers is mentioning the types of drugs involvement, which accounts for more than half of the ads. Interestingly, the mentioned frequency of stimulant drugs (29%) was 11% more than opioid drugs (18%) in the ads of centers.
In addition, 100% of centers advertised their medicines, i.e., methadone, buprenorphine, etc. Similar to the previous study, methadone was the most prescribed medicine, mentioned by 52% of the ads, compared to 39%, in May 2009. Additionally, the importance of buprenorphine increased from 27% in May 2009 to 34% in November 2012. Nonetheless, there was no advertisement for naltrexone. However, about 13% of the centers used a vague code, new pharmacotherapies, previously mentioned by only one clinic in May 2009. A comparison between the two time periods revealed that the medicines and drugs had a more serious role in introducing the centers and attracting their audience, since the medicines were mentioned by just 47% of the ads in May 2009 (
Table 3).