Materials
The PC3 and HEK293 cells were purchased from the Pasteur Institute of Iran. Stearic acid, tween 80, spermine, 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride, dichloro- methane, triethylamine, DTX, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), MTT (3-(4, 5- Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium Bromide), and all other reagents have purchased from Merck and Sigma-Aldrich.
Preparation of DTX loaded SLN nanoparticles
Synthesis of Spermine- Anisamide
4-methoxybenzoyl chloride, anisamide, (200 mg, 1.176 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL dichloromethane. Spermine (50 μL, 0.227 mmol) and triethylamine (50 μL, 0.36 mmol) were added to the solution, and the mixture was stirred at 200
×g for 24 h at room temperature. The solvent was removed via rotary evaporation
Figure 1 (
15).
Preparation of SLN-DTX-Anis nanoparticles
SLNs were prepared by the altered high shear homogenization and ultrasonication method. Stearic acid (50 mg) was melted at about 80 °C, and certain amounts of DTX (2 mg) and spermine-Anis (100 mg) was added to obtain a clear solution. The aqueous phase was prepared by dissolving 70 mg of tween 80 in 15 mL of distilled water and heated at 85 °C (above the melting temperature of the lipid phase). The lipid phase was then gradually added to the aqueous phase, and the mixture was homogenized at 15000
×g for 10 min. The obtained nano dispersion was sonicated for 5 min and cooled down under stirring conditions of 300
×g and at room temperature for 10 min. Eventually, the prepared nanoparticles have been lyophilized and stored at 4 ºC (
16,
17).
Optimization of nanoparticle preparation method
In order to keep the number of experiments affordable for optimization of the nanoparticles preparation method, the central composite design was chosen in Design-Expert software (trial version, 7.0.0). Three formulation parameters were selected as the independent variables, including the amount of drug (DTX), stearic acid, and tween 80. These factors are presented in
Table 1. The measured dependent variables were the size of the nanoparticles, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, and entrapment efficiency (EE). Finally, an optimized formulation was selected, and other characterization parameters have been evaluated. The performance of nanoparticles is affected by many parameters, mainly size, shape, surface charge, and toxicity of the particles.
Nanoparticle characterization
Particle size and surface morphology
Nanoparticle’s mean diameter and polydispersity measurements were performed by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) and surface charge of the nanoparticle by electrophoretic movement using a Malvern Zetasizer nano series system (ZEN3600 model, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, England). The operation was performed at the temperature of 25 °C, a medium refractive index of 1.33, and viscosity of 0.8872 cP with 90degree light scattering. The applied samples have been appropriately diluted with deionized water. Each measurement has been performed in triplicate at room temperature. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
The morphology of nanoparticles has been determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Phillips, the Netherlands). In order to make the samples conductive, they were coated with a thin layer of gold before the results were recorded by SEM at 20 kV.
FT-IR characterization of nanoparticles
Fourier transformed-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using (Bruker FTIR spectrometer). FT-IR identifies chemical bonds in a molecule by producing an infrared absorption spectrum. To consider the FT-IR spectrum of DTX, Blank SLN, DTX-SLN-anis, spermine, and anisamide, 2 mg of the samples were mixed with 10 mg of KBr and compressed into tablets. The IR spectra of these tablets were obtained in an absorbance mode and in the spectral region of 450 to 4,000 cm−1.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis
Thermal analysis of DTX- SLN- Anis nanoparticles and bulk materials has been performed using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) (Malvern, England). About 4 mg of dried samples were completely sealed in the aluminum pans. Air was considered as a reference (Empty pan). Samples were heated from 30 to 200 °C (heating rate of 10 °C/min) under the Ar atmosphere.
Drug loading (DL) and entrapment efficiency (EE) determination
Drug loading (DL) and EE% were calculated by measuring the amount of unloaded DTX. Briefly, 20 mL of the freshly prepared nanodispersion was centrifuged at 30000
×g for 20 min using ultracentrifuge in order to separate free DTX aqueous solution. The free DTX concentrations were analyzed by the UV-VIS method at a wavelength of 229 nm. The percentages of DL and EE have been determined by applying the Equations 1 and 2 (
18-
21):
EE (%) = (Weight of DTX in nanoparticle"s " )/(Drug total weight) × 100%
Equation 1.
DL (%) = (Weight of DTX in nanoparticles)/(Total nanoparticle weight) × 100%
Equation 2.
In-vitro drug release
In-vitro release studies of DTX from DTX-SLN and DTX-SLN-Anis were investigated using the dialysis method (cut off = 12000 Da).
DTX has low solubility in water (6-7 µg/mL); therefore, sink conditions were maintained for release studies by phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4) as the release medium (
22). The drug-loaded nanoparticles of a volume equivalent to 10 mg DTX were dialyzed against receptor medium over a period of 48 h. In order to mimic the biological conditions, a bio incubator (Heidolph, Germany) was used at the temperature of 37 °C and the rate of 100 cycles/min. The amount of released DTX in the receptor medium has been determined by applying the spectrophotometer method, and the accumulated release profile versus time was drawn. This study was performed with three replicates, and the outcomes were explained as mean values ± standard deviation (
23).
Release kinetics
Zero-order, First-order, Hixson–Crowell, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer–Peppas models were selected to fit on the release profile. The goodness of fitting for the release kinetic models was evaluated with correlation coefficient values (R2).
In-vitro cytotoxicity assay
PC3 and HEK293 cell lines were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of targeted nanoparticles. Cells were cultured in the RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FBS and placed in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 overnight. Cells were seeded in 100 μL of growth medium using 96-well culture microplates at a density of 104 per well. After 24 h of incubation, cells were treated with different concentrations (0.062-1 nM) of DTX-SLN, DTX-SLN-Anis, anisamide, blank SLN, and DTX. The cells treated with a cytotoxic drug and the untreated cells were used as the positive, negative, and control, respectively, and the plain medium as the blank. At specified time intervals, the medium was removed, and 100 μL of DMSO was added.
The absorbance of cells has been measured by using a microplate reader scanning spectrophotometer at 570 nm. Relative cell viability was calculated using Equation 3:
Viability (%) = (absorbance of each wells)/(average absorbance of untreated wells) × 100%
Equation 3.
The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC
50) was also calculated by using the diagram of viability percentage (
y-axis) and log
C (
x-axis) Made by Graph Pad Prism 6 software (
24-
26).