Quantitative determination of phenolic compound content by LC-MS/MS
Many studies have shown that phenolic compounds have some biological activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antitumor. In general, it has been reported that the antioxidant activities of phenolic and flavonoids may depend on the chemical structure of the compounds and the distribution of hydroxyl groups. Thus, phenolic compounds can protect cellular components against oxidative damage and therefore reduce the risk of degenerative disease due to oxidative stress (
28). In this study, it was reported that the phenolic compounds in the
Erica herbal extract were effective for preventing lipid peroxidation. Also,
Erica extracts contain flavonoids and other phenolics that can contribute to total antioxidant activity (
10).
In this study, the phenolic compounds (flavonoids or phenolic acids) composition of EMS was evaluated with the phenolic compounds introduced as standard. Linear regression quotations and linearity ranges of standard compounds available in the instrument library are given in
Table 1. In the analytical method used, LOD and LOQ varied in the range of 0.5 μg mL
-1-206.8 μg L
-1 and 0.1 μg mL
-1-214.3 μg L
-1, respectively. Recovery of phenolic compounds; ranges from 96.6% to 101.1%. In the literatüre, when the validation studies performed for the determination of phenolic compounds were examined, it was seen that they were in parallel with the data in this study. The R
2 values are within the limits of the data available in the literature. In a study on method development, the correlation coefficients were higher than 0.999, and the recoveries varied between 95.9% and 106% (
29). In the LC-MS/MS validation study performed for some plant species, the LOD/LOQ varied in the range of 0.05 μg mL-25.8 μg L
-1 and 0.17 μg mL
-1-85.9 μg L-1, respectively, and the recovery of phenolic compounds ranged from 96.9% to 106.2% (30). These results supported our quantitative phenolic analysis.
As seen in
Table 1, it was determined that the amount of vanillic acid (520.01 µg L
-1), fumaric acid (411.06 µg L
-1), catechin hydrate (261. 27 µg L
-1), quercetin (174.36 µg L
-1), myricetin (131.18 µg L
-1) and phloridzin dihydrate (98.31 µg L
-1) were higher than acetohydroxamic acid, caffeic acid, resveratrol, gallic acid and oleuropein, bütein and kaempferol in the range of 84.37µg L
-1-8.83 µg L
-1 (
Table 1). The compounds we detected in the study are mainly from flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids, and derivatives. In a study, content analysis of
Erica arborea L. samples was made using LC-MS analysis, and 72 different phenolic compounds were identified. They have classified all of these components into four different groups: (1) flavonoid aglycones, (2) flavonoid glycosides, (3) phenolic acids and derivatives, and (4) flavan-3-ols and proanthocyanidins (
31). As stated in the literature, it can be said that these species show many bioactive properties with their richness in phenolic compounds and, therefore may have therapeutic effects for many diseases.
Vanillic acid is a phenolic derivative of some plants and fruits. It is also formed as an intermediate product during the production of vanillin from ferulic acid. The earlier studies reported that vanillic acid has a hepatoprotective effect of the acetaminophen (APAP)-induced toxicity in rats (
32). Adipic, tartaric, citric, ascorbic, malic, and fumaric acid were employed as antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (
33). Catechin hydrate is one of the important flavonoids derived from plants as a secondary metabolite. It has gained attention due to its potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. On the other hand, its important properties have been found to prevent and treat diseases stemmed from oxidative damage Quercetin and myricetin have some abilities to prevent the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) chelating transition metal ions and scavenging free radicals. Generally, it might prevent certain diseases, such as chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis and cancer. Although myricetin occurs in less common foods than quercetin, it is consumed at lower levels than quercetin. Some researchers reported that myricetin could have greater antioxidants activity than quercetin. But, it might be less active than quercetin for the inhibition of low-density lipoproteins (
34).
Antioxidant activities of EMS
It has been suggested that a wide variety of phenolic content of plants might result from the differences in their structural properties. According to the researchers, the significant correlations between phenolics and antioxidant activity may support the hypothesis that phenolic compounds found in plant extracts can contribute to the total antioxidant capacity (
35). The beneficial effects of vegetables, plants, and fruits might be explained by their high antioxidant properties.
DPPH assay test is generally used for the measurement of free radical scavenging activities of antioxidants. This method is stemmed from the reduction of a DPPH solution in alcohol with the source of a hydrogen donating antioxidant. ABTS radical cation is calculated with the spectrophotometric method (
36). In a study, the DPPH scavenging effect of
E. manipuliflora methanol extracts was investigated, and it showed a radical scavenging effect of approximately 50 % at 255 mg mL
-1 concentrations (
37). While 18% radical scavenging activity was shown in the current study, this rate was 50% at 100 times lower concentration in the previous study. In another study, methanol (IC
50: 0.38. ± 0.002 mg mL
-1) and hexane extract (IC
50: 0.20 ± 0.001 mg mL
-1) of this plant exhibited ABTS radical scavenging activities (
3). As seen in
Table 2, The EMS ethanol extract showed about 22% ABTS radical scavenging activity and 18% DPPH radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 0.2 mg mL
-1. In the antioxidant activity test performed according to the DPPH method, the highest antioxidant activity was determined in the standard of torolox (0.2 mg mL
-1) (measuring 81.19%) and it was followed by BHA (0.2 mg mL
-1) (measuring 71.82%), BHT (0.2 mg mL
-1) (46.33%), and EMS (0.2 mg mL
-1) (measuring 18.31%), respectively. Also, similar findings were determined using the ABTS method. In other words, the antioxidant activity decreased according to this order: Torolox> BHA>BHT>EMS. The antioxidant activities of these plants might be stemmed from the absence of some specificity components. Similar results were reported by Sengul
et al., (
12) for “
Artemisia absinthium,
Saponaria officinalis, and
Artemisia santonicum extracts“. The multifunctional antioxidant activity of polyphenols is highly correlated with phenol rings (acting as electron traps) that play an active role in scavenging many reactive radical species (
38).
The reduction assay can be used to measure the total reducing capacity of plant extracts and antioxidant compounds (
39). The CUPRAC assay is a rapid, simple, cost-effective, selective, and steady antioxidant determination method for a wide variety of polyphenols. CUPRAC reactions might be completed approximately in 30 min (
18). In a study, extracts of different parts of
E. manipuliflora were prepared and found to have metal reduction potential (
3). As seen in
Table 2, the iron and copper reducing activity of EMS is close to trolox, indicating that its antioxidant capacity is high. The highest reduction capability was determined in BHT, and it was followed by BHA, while trolox, and our plant extract showed similar activity. The absorbances value was measured for trolox as 0.516 ± 0.012; while CUPRAC assay value was measured for EMS as 0.401±0.009, respectively. The obtained results showed that the used plant extract had a good copper removal activity. Also, it might be said that phenolic compounds such as vanillic acid, fumaric acid, catechin hydrate, caffeic acid, resveratrol, gallic acid, oleuropein, butein, and kaempferol that found in EMS can contribute significantly to radical removal and metal reduction capacity.
The anticholinergic effect
Overactivity of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme, which hydrolyzes the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, causes Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AChE inhibitors used in the symptomatic treatment of AD are known to increase antioxidant production and protect cells from oxidative damage (
40).
In a study, the inhibition effect of aqueous extracts of E. manipuliflora on AChE was investigated, and it showed an inhibition effect of approximately 50% against AChE enzyme at 200 µg mL
-1 concentrations (
41). They reported a lower anticholinergic effect compared to the current study (124 µg mL
-1). As shown in
Table 2, EMS ethanol extract had an inhibition effect on AChE (IC
50: 0.124 ± 0.008 mg mL
-1, R
2: 0.965). Köroğlu
et al., (
42) usually found higher values for total phenolic content and antioxidant activity than our findings, while Dias
et al., (
43) reported similar results with our studies. Many studies have reported that flavonoid and phenolic compounds have anti-acetylcholinesterase activity. Because of the neuroprotective effects of phenolic compounds, they may play an important role in treating AD. One of the most important approaches for the treatment of this disease is to raise the acetylcholine rate in the brain with AChE inhibitors. AChE activity is also effective in intestinal health and AChE inhibitors are used to treat gastric disease, abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. Also, Dias
et al., (
43) and Kuş
et al., (
3) reported that several types of
Ericaceae family showed a very strong inhibitory activity against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) enzymes. In this study, considering the LS-MS/MS content analysis, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, silymarin, lutein, resveratrol and other phenolic acids in the content of EMS have been reported to have an inhibitory effect against AChE (
2,
44 and
45). In the light of this information in the literature, it can be said that the radical removal potential of EMS ethanol extract may be due to its phenolic compound content.
Linoleic acid peroxidation removal activity of EMS
The ability to remove linoleic acid peroxidation by the ferric thiocyanate method is one of the most used antioxidant parameters. This method measures the amount of peroxide formed during lipid peroxidation. In this analysis, hydroperoxides are oxidized by the oxygen of the air and formed because of peroxidation of linoleic acid in the emulsion that is indirectly measured. In a study, the inhibition effect of
E. manipuliflora extracts (ethyl acetate) on lipid peroxidation was investigated, and it showed an inhibition effect of approximately 50% at 45 µg/mL concentrations (
41). They reported a lower lipid peroxidation inhibitory effect compared to the current study (20 µg/mL). In the study, it was found that the sample extract (20 µg mL
-1) inhibits lipid peroxidation for up to 36 h (
Figure 1). The inhibition effect of EMS, trolox, and α-tocopherol on the linoleic acid oxidation was found to be approximately 41%, 28%, and 38%, respectively, at 24
th h. The inhibition effect of this plant extract on the peroxidation of the linoleic acid emulsion was higher than the standards. As a result of our study, it can be said that the high lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity may be due to the compounds in the plant content. In a previous study, it has been stated that many phenolic and flavonoid compounds have an inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation (
46). These results suggest that phenolic compounds found in plant content could be a suitable natural antioxidant for preventing the oxidation of fatty acids and foodstuffs containing them.
The obtained results showed that the phenolic compound contents of EMS exhibited significant anticholinergic and antioxidant activities (metal reduction, radical and lipid peroxidation removal). In addition, this research revealed that this plant, which had a naturally rich source of antioxidants, might be used to prevent many diseases such as Alzheimer’s and atherosclerosis.
Antimicrobial properties of EMS
The plants that have some medicinal properties are being picked up and used by humans to treat being picked up and used by humans for the treatment of various diseases in the world and our countries for centuries. Although technology and medicine have developed extensively in recent years, humans preferred to use natural products due to their natural and harmless properties on health. In the study, antimicrobial activities of the extract obtained from EMS plant against three different microorganisms, namely
Staphylococcus aureus,
Esherichia coli and
Salmonella Typhimurium, were tested using the disk diffusion method and MIC method. Ciprofloxacin was used as a control sample for antimicrobial activity measurement (
Tables 3 and
4).
Our study is one of the first studies to examine the antimicrobial effect of this plant extract on these bacteria. Firstly, the antimicrobial effect of the essential oils of this plant
Ericamanipuliflora grown in Syria was investigated by Tlas
et al. (
47). This study belonging to the authors showed that essential oil of
Erica manipuliflora had moderate activity against the pathogenic bacteria, with minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values ranging from 8 to 32 mg mL
-1. Since the antimicrobial effect was examined with the crude extract in our study, it can be accepted that it has an effect at high concentrations (312 mg mL
-1).
When
Table 3 was examined, it was determined that the 312 mg mL
-1 plant extract created a 3 ± 0.28 mm inhibition zone diameter on
S. aureus and Salmonella
Typhimurium, while its inhibition effect on the
E. coli was 4 ± 0.07 mm. The obtained inhibition effect for extract was found to be quite low compared to the ciprofloxacin. When the MIC results were examined, the most effective of 10 μL plant extract inoculum at 6 different concentrations (312 mg mL
-1, 156 mg mL
-1, 78 mg mL
-1, 39 mg mL
-1, 20 mg mL
-1 and 10 mg mL
-1) was found as 312 mg ml
-1 (
Table 4). The obtained results revealed that the substances found in the researched plant had slightly antimicrobial effects against the specified microorganisms. Similar results were also reported for
Erica species by Guendouze-Bouchefa
et al., (
5), Turgay and Esen (
37). Also, Kıvçak
et al., (
48) reported that all extracts of
Erica showed antimicrobial activity against some bacteria but had no against the effect on observed yeast (
Candida albicans). Similarly, the antibacterial effect of
Erica multiflora was found weak against
Staphylococcus aureus with a MIC (1000 mg L
-1) method by Rios
et al., (
49). Kacar
et al. (
50) investigated antimicrobial activity
Erica Manipuliflora Salisb. which is endemic in Turkey (Muğla, Datça), against microfouling bacteria with using the MIC and Disc diffusion methods. At the end of their study, it was determined that their inhibition zones ranged between 8 and 15 mm. They had a strong antimicrobial activity. Upon the completion of the microdilution analysis, minimum values were determined as 19.5 mg mL
-1. In another study, reported by Kıvçak
et al. (
48), the ethanol extracts of
Erica bocquetii showed high antibacterial activity against some pathogens
(Salmonella Typhimirium CCM 5445,
Staphylococus aureus ATCC 6538P,
Escherichia coli ATCC 29998).
The antimicrobial activity of the
Erica family was attributed to phenolic compounds. Because polyphenols and tannins in this plant possess a strong binding ability to proteins or glycoproteins, also according to our knowledge, the antimicrobial activity of EMS could be associated with flavonoid aglycones, flavonoid glycosides, phenolic acids and derivatives, and flavan-3-ols and proanthocyanidins, the main components of EMS in our study, which is already known to exhibit antibacterial effects (
37). These compounds may bind the bacterial adhesins and disturb the receptor exposition on the cell surface. Determination of many properties such as antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of EMS that grows naturally in our country would be advantageous in use in medicine, pharmacy, and industry. Some studies showed that the therapeutic effects of herbs were due to the synergistic effect of multiple compounds rather than a single active ingredient. In addition, it was determined that the active herbal substances provided a more effective treatment on antibiotic-resistant microorganisms (
51).
Linoleic acid peroxidation inhibitory activity of standard antioxidants (α-tocopherol and troloks) and EMS extracts (20 µg mL-1).
| Standard compounds | aMRM | bRSD (%) | cLOD/LOQ(μg L-1) | Recovery (%) | dRT | eR2 | Equation | Concentration(µg L-1) |
|---|
| Quercetin | 301.1 > 151 | 0.0136 | 22.5/25.7 | 1.001 | 3.891 | 0.999 | Y = (13.7831)X + (-146.951) | 174.36 |
| Acetohydroxamic Acid | 76.10 > 43.10 | 0.0082 | 2.8/8.2 | 1.000 | 0.406 | 0.999 | Y = (150.982)X + (23.1833) | 84.37 |
| Catechin hydrate | 291.10 > 139.00 | 0.0236 | 8.2/11.4 | 0.994 | 2.532 | 0.999 | Y = (79.2933)X + (-2406.22) | 261.27 |
| Vanillic Acid | 168.80 > 93.00 | 0.0062 | 125.5/142.2 | 1.001 | 2.762 | 0.998 | Y = (48.0522)X+ (-876.904) | 520.01 |
| Resveratrol | 229.10 > 135.00 | 0.0131 | 9.0/13.6 | 0.998 | 3.606 | 0.998 | Y = (46.4361)X + (-1314.61) | 26.06 |
| Fumaric Acid | 115.20 > 71.00 | 0.0047 | 25.2/31.3 | 0.997 | 0.809 | 0.999 | Y = (20.2986)X + (-762.592) | 411.06 |
| Gallic acid | 169.20 > 125.00 | 0.0136 | 0.90/1.6 | 1.000 | 1.278 | 0.999 | Y = (65.3835)X + (-2699.84) | 14.87 |
| Caffeic Acid | 179.20 > 135.00 | 0.0137 | 6.3/10.7 | 1.009 | 2.836 | 0.996 | Y = (124.785)X + (-487.132) | 37.91 |
| Phloridzin dihydrate | 435.00 > 273.10 | 0.0564 | 61.0/207.0 | 1.00 | 3.594 | 0.999 | Y = (33.4069)X + (-1396.90) | 98.31 |
| Oleuropein | 539.10 > 377.20 | 0.0694 | 0.05/1.0 | 0.997 | 3.567 | 0.999 | Y = (25.9240)X + (-558.916) | 14.31 |
| Ellagic Acid | 300.90 > 145.10 | 0.0856 | 0.101/0.333 | 1.002 | 3.681 | 1.000 | Y = (5.25903)X + (-1167.31) | N.D. |
| Myricetin | 317.10 > 150.90 | 0.0079 | 55.4/59.6 | 0.999 | 3.644 | 0.999 | Y = (37.0934)X + (2684.23) | 131.18 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 181.20 > 108.00 | 0.0129 | 30.3/35.4 | 1.011 | 3.556 | 0.994 | Y = (526.954)X + (23026.1) | N.D. |
| Butein | 271.10 > 135.00 | 0.0145 | 22.7/28.6 | 0.096 | 3.935 | 0.999 | Y = (49.3543)X + (367.917) | 61.67 |
| Naringenin | 271.10 > 150.90 | 0.0205 | 5.4/6.4 | 0.998 | 3.952 | 0.996 | Y = (317.241)X + (33733.3) | N.D. |
| Luteolin | 285.20 > 132.90 | 0.0057 | 0.5/2.5 | 1.007 | 4.069 | 0.998 | Y = (34.6668)X + (3721.79) | N.D. |
| Kaempferol | 285.10 > 116.90 | 0.0144 | 206.6/214.3 | 0.999 | 4.298 | 0.999 | Y = (2.63905)X + (-206.494) | 8.83 |
| Alizarin | 239.20 > 210.90 | 0.0351 | 65.2/77.5 | 0.966 | 4.594 | 0.998 | Y = (3.97487)X + (1614.23) | N.D. |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic Acid | 137.20 > 93.00 | 0.0154 | 30.5/40.25 | 0.996 | 3.664 | 0.999 | Y = (735.804)X + (-498.102) | N.D. |
| Salicylic acid | 137.20 > 93.00 | 0.0124 | 4.2/7.6 | 1.009 | 3.558 | 0.999 | Y = (746.369)X + (6072.41) | N.D. |
| Samples | DPPHa(0.2 mg mL-1) | ABTSa(0.2 mg mL-1) | FRAPb(0.2 mg mL-1) | CUPRACb(0.2 mg mL-1) | AChE |
|---|
| IC50 (mg ml-1) | R2 |
|---|
| EMS | 18.31 ± 0.17 | 22.45 ± 0.43 | 0.251 ± 0.008 | 0.401 ± 0.009 | 0.124 ± 0.008 | 0.965 ± 0.002 |
| BHA | 71.82 ± 3.65 | 83.67 ± 2.62 | 0.454 ± 0.013 | | | |
| BHT | 46.33 ± 2.36 | 48.35 ± 1.99 | 0.624 ± 0.021 | | | |
| Trolox | 81.19 ± 6.63 | 80.06 ± 5.65 | 0.252 ± 0.009 | 0.516 ± 0.012 | | |
| Samples(6.24 mg/disk) | Concentration | Inhibition zone diameter (mm)Staphylococcus aureus | Inhibition zone diameter (mm)Esherichia coli | Inhibition zone diameter (mm)Salmonella Typhimurium |
|---|
| EMS | 312 mg mL-1 | 3 ± 0.28 | 4 ± 0.07 | 3 ± 0.21 |
| Control (Ciprofloxacin) | 5 μg | 19 ± 0.35 | 18 ± 0.14 | 16 ± 0.42 |
| Erica manipuliflora | Concentration(mg mL-1) | Inoculum amount (μL) | Staphylococcus aureus | Esherichia coli | Salmonella Typhimurium |
|---|
| 312 | 10 | - | - | - |
| 156 | 10 | + | + | + |
| 78 | 10 | + | + | + |
| 39 | 10 | + | + | + |
| 19.5 | 10 | + | + | + |
| 9.75 | 10 | + | + | + |
| Medium+Inoculum | 0 | 10 | + | + | + |
| Medium+Solvent (DMSO) | 0 | 10 | + | + | + |
| Medium | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |