Before the synthesis of ciprofloxacin- peptide conjugates, it was needed to prepare Fmoc-Ciprofloxacin, since the drug such as an amino acid must be N-terminally blocked in order to avoid byproduct formation during conjugation with peptides. Ciprofloxacin is not so much soluble as a normal amino acid in aqueous reaction medium, even at pH 9-10, and it starts precipitating during reaction with Fmoc-OSu. Therefore, a mixture solution of water (adjusted with pH 11 by saturated sodium bicarbonate solution) and acetone was employed to dissolve ciprofloxacin during a period of 1h time before reaction with Fmoc-OSu. In another experiment, ciprofloxacin HCl was dissolved in water and then acetone was added to the water dropwise, while carefully watching any precipitation does not happen. The solution was adjusted to pH 11 by sodium bicarbonate and then Fmoc-OSu solution (previously dissolved in acetone) was added slowly to the reaction medium while the solution was kept clear.
Many N-terminal derivatives of Ciprofloxacin have been reported to show activities against topoisomerase enzymes and thus were introduced as antibiotic or anticancer agents (28, 29). This is because the structure activity relationship studies recommend that C3- carboxylic acid of cyprofloxacin should be free in order to achieve and preserve biological activity of ciprofloxacin. Nevertheless, few examples of C3- carboxylic acid derivatives have been synthesized which were quite active as antibacterial and anticancer agents (30-32). However, in these Ciprofloxacin derivatives, the chelating sites made by two carbonyl/enol groups at C3 and C4 of Ciprofloxacin structure were reserved, although modified. In the present study, Fmoc-Ciprofloxacin was conjugated with cytotoxic peptides
N-terminally through the carboxylic acid moiety of Ciprofloxacin, hoping that Ciprofloxacin would keep its chelating property, which along with peptides’ cytotoxicity give higher activity against cancer cells. After conjugation of the drug with peptides attached to the resin, Fmoc removal of the drug-peptidyl resin was performed before cleaving the conjugate from the resin. To do this job, piperazine reagent as a secondary amine base was used. It should be mentioned that the attached piperazine ring, as a part of Ciprofloxacin molecule most probably would not be involved during and after Fmoc group removal in the reaction. That is because the attached piperazine ring was not freely moveable and available in this environment. Moreover, piperazine reagent as a small molecule dissolved in DMF, was used with a concentration very higher than that of piperazine ring as a part of ciprofloxacin molecule bound to a relatively large size peptide molecule attached to the resin. On the other hand, the usual side reaction of the dibenzofulvene molecule, released as the deformed Fmoc group in the reaction, with dissolved piperazine reagent, should not have been occurred with the piperazine ring of the newly conjugate Ciprofloxacin-peptidyl resin, because several on time washing the resin with DMF solvent could not allow such undesired side reaction to occur. Moreover, the conjugated products after cleavage from the resin gave the relevant desired molecular weights of the compounds and not different unwanted molecular weights, as the mass spectra results demonstrated (
Figures 4,
5). Anticancer activities of the peptides, GLTSK (C
1), GEGSGA (C
2 ) and their conjugates examined on HT-29 colon cells showed that high inhibitory activity (around 92%) can be achieved using 10 to 1000 µM concentrations of the corresponding compounds (
Table 1). In this respect, concentrations higher than 10 µM did not increase the inhibitory activity of the compounds significantly. This may be interpreted that the efficacy of these compounds for inhibitory action on the aforementioned cells has reached to the maximum with 10 µM concentration and, therefore, with higher concentrations of the compounds it would not raise anymore. The achieved inhibitory action of the peptides was in accordance with the results of anticancer properties of the peptides reported previously (21). In order to examine the cell toxicity of these peptides on other cell lines, two breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 were employed to expose to the low concentration (10 µM) of each peptides, a chosen concentration which was obviously more favorable than the other concentrations of the peptides. According to our results shown in
Table 2, the both peptides showed cytotoxic effect on the both breast cell lines, and this effect was maintained or intensified by their Ciprofloxacin conjugate on MDA-MB-231 cells. However, C
2 peptide although showed potent cell toxicity on MCF-7, C
2Cipro conjugate demonstrated rather weaker toxic effect. Considering the net charges of C
1 and C
2 peptides being positive and negative in physiologic pH, respectively and also the C
1 hydrophobicity being less than C
2 (21), this phenomenon can be interpreted that MCF-7 cells act more selectively towards allowing toxic compounds to enter their inside, compared to MDA-MB-213 cells, and this selection is in the favor of accepting negative and more hydrophobic ionic molecules (like C
2 peptide) rather than a zwitterionic (like Ciprofloxacin) and less hydrophobic (like C
2 Cipro) and positive ionic (like C
1 peptide) molecules. In this regard, Ciprofloxacin and C
1 peptide with moderate hydophilicity are more active against MDA-MB-231 cells. Peptides C
1, C
2 and their conjugates demonstrated a safety profile on Fibroblast cells (See
Table 2).