Study design and setting
A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in Shahid Madani Heart Center, the largest referral center for cardiovascular disorders at the north-west of Iran for a period of 14 months. The study was approved in the ethics committee of the university.
Sample size calculation
Based on data from our center, about 400 patients with acute STEMI have been receiving thrombolytic therapy each year. Assuming the 95% confidence interval and α = 0.05 the sample size will be 210 patients with a standard error of 0.025 during 14-month study period.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The patients’ eligibility criteria included the age of over 18 years old with a diagnosis of acute STEMI who candidate for receiving streptokinase.
Exclusion criteria included acute or chronic kidney and liver disease, pregnant women and patients not able to continue the study, and contraindications of thrombolytic therapy including recent head/facial trauma and/or ischemic stroke within last 3 months, intracranial tumor, and prior intracranial hemorrhage, suspected aortic dissection, active internal bleeding, or bleeding diathesis and severe uncontrolled hypertension.
Streptokinase injection method
The streptokinase was administered as soon as possible after the first symptoms of STEMI (under the six hours from onset of symptoms) with the usual adult dose of AMI as 1,500,000 units intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 min. In case of allergic reactions and fever, it was recommended that patients concurrently should receive corticosteroids that can be repeated during treatment. Before treatment, the patient PT and PTT were being controlled. In case of anaphylactic shock symptoms and hypotension, malaise, chills, nausea and arrhythmia, the infusion was being stopped.
Detection and classification of ADRs
All patients receiving streptokinase that had completed the informed consent form were monitored for ADRs induced by streptokinase. Detection and monitoring of ADRs were done through completing a questionnaire by reviewing the patientsꞌ medical file and documentation as well as interviewing with the patients.
The questionnaire includes the demographic information, past medical history, drug history, familial, habitual and social history, laboratory and echocardiographic information.
The Naranjo probability scale was used to causality assessment of ADRs as follows: The scores between 1-4 ranked as possible, 5-8 ranked as probable and > 9 ranked as highly probable. The score of < 0 was deemed as doubtful ADR (10). Based on the FDA classification, the severity of ADRs was categorized in four levels: 1) mild: no need to treatment, 2) moderate: need to specific treatment, 3) severe: cause to prolonged hospitalization, 4) very severe: potential life-threatening or contribute to the death.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 (Chicago, SPSS Inc., 2007). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was utilized to determine the normally distribution of data. The correlation evaluation between ADRs and the study parameters was done using Spearman test. The linear regression (Stepwise method) and logistic regression analysis were performed to find out any relationships between the incidence and number of ADRs and the study independent risk factors. Continues data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.