Identification of the isolated compounds
To confirm the presence of genistin in soy flour, it was subjected to chromatographic fractionation resulted in isolation of two compounds (1 and 2). By comparing
1HNMR spectral data of compounds 1 and 2 with the previously reported data (
20), as well as by acid hydrolysis and comparison with authentic aglycones and sugars using TLC, these compounds were identified as genistin and daidzin, respectively.
Compound 1: Rf = 0.40 in ethyl acetate: MeOH: H2O: Formic acid (100: 16: 13: 20 drops), showed dull fluorescence in UV, no color with p-anisaldehyde spray reagent. 1H-NMR (CD3OD): δH 8.15 (1H, s, H-2), 7.36 (2H, d, J=7.6 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 6.86 (2H, d, J=7.6 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′). 6.71 (1H, d, J=2.1 Hz, H-8), 6.51 (1H, d, J=2.1 Hz, H-6), 5.19 (1H, d, J=7.6 Hz, H-1′′), 3.43-4.12 (m, Sugar protons).
Compound 2: Rf = 0.45 in ethyl acetate: MeOH: H2O: Formic acid (100: 16: 13: 20 drops), showed dull fluorescence in UV, no color with p-anisaldehyde spray reagent. 1H-NMR (CD3OD): δH 8.208 (1H, s, H-2), 8.126 (1H, d, J=9.2 Hz, H-5), 7.358 (2H, d, J=8.4 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 7.223 (1H, dd, J=10.7, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 7.207 (1H, d, J=2.1 Hz, H-8), 6.846 (2H, d, J=8.4 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 5.029 (1H, d, J=7.6 Hz, H-1′′), 3.38-3.94 (m, Sugar protons).
Optimization of genistein production
A sequential optimization strategy was applied in this work, where the first phase dealt with screening and identifying the reaction mixture components and conditions affecting genistein aglycone production by the β-glucosidase enzymes. Once the significant factors were determined, the second phase involving ascertaining the combinations leading to the maximum genistein aglycone yield were carried out.
In the first phase, a Plackett-Burman experimental design was applied to reflect the relative importance of various enzymatic biotransformation factors. The data shown in
Table 2 revealed a wide variation in genistein conc. (0.633-4.167 mg/g), thereby reflecting the significant effect of the studied factors for attaining a higher productivity. Sorted parameters estimates of the nine tested variables, revealing that enzyme conc., time and agitation rate had a significant positive effect on genistein aglycone production, whereas, pH had a significant negative effect (
Table 3).
To improve the pre-optimization formula for the subsequent optimization step, the variables with a negative-effect value obtained from the Plackett-Burman design were fixed at their (-1) coded values, and the variables with a positive-effect value fixed at their (+1) coded value. To identify the optimum response region for genistein aglycone the significant independent variables [reaction time, agitation rate, enzyme concentration and pH] were further explored at three levels.
Table 4 presented the design matrix for the variables, given in both coded and natural units, plus the experimental genistein aglycone production results.
Figure 1 shows the relationships between the significant tested factors (enzyme concentration, time, agitation rate and pH) and soy isoflavone aglycone (genistein) yield.
The results obtained (
Table 5) revealed that the reaction time is the most effective factor on genistein concentration followed by the enzyme concentration. Increasing the reaction time and enzyme concentration were accompanied by increase in genistein concentration. On the other hand, increasing pH and agitation rate were followed by decrease in genistein concentration. In general, increasing the reaction time to 5 h increased genistein concentration unless the enzyme concentration was decreased to its lower limit (0.5 IU). It is noticed that increasing pH to its high limit (5) was accompanied by decrease in the genistein concentration at agitation rate of 250 and 300 rpm, meanwhile decreasing the agitation rate to its lower limit (200 rpm) reversed this effect at the same enzyme concentration (0.75 IU) and reaction time (4 h).
The optimal levels for the factors were found to be, enzyme concentration (1 IU), time (5 h), agitation rate (250 rpm) and pH (4), where genistein concentration reach up to (7.93 mg/g). On the other hand, the lower aglycone concentration (2.182 mg/g) was obtained at experimental conditions of: enzyme concentration (0.5 IU), time (3 h), agitation rate (250 rpm), and pH (4).
Also, it was found that, the concentration of genistein aglycones in the biotransformed suspension was increased by 9.91 folds compared to the non biotransformed one. Similar results were obtained where the content of daidzein had increased by 34 folds in soybean flour suspension biotransformed by
a thermostable
β-glucosidase enzyme produced from Paecilomyces thermophile (
21). Maitan-Alfenas
et al. 2014 (
22) found that
β-glucosidase increased genistein content from 1.28 mg/g in the non biotransformed to 6.37 mg/g in the biotransformed soy molasses. This result also supported by Pandijtan
et al. 2000 (
23) who found that
β-glucosidase enzyme increased genistein content from 0.028 mg/g in the non biotransformed to 0.583 mg/g in the biotransformed soy protein concentrate.
On the model level, the correlation measures for estimating the regression equation were the determination coefficient (RSq). The closer the value of RSq to 1, the better the correlation between the measured and the predicted values. In this experiment, the value of the determination coefficient (RSq) was 0.96 indicating a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values that confirms the high accuracy of the model and also suggestes that the models are satisfactory and accurate.
Antioxidant activity
Lately it has been reported that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are implicated in a large number of human diseases. When an imbalance between antioxidants and generation of ROS occurs, oxidative damage can occur and generate a large number of health problems such as arteriosclerosis and cancer (
24). Therefore, there is increased interest focused on natural antioxidants present in foods and medicinal plants. In this study, the antioxidant properties of the non biotransformed and biotransformed soy flour extracts were evaluated by DPPH method. The two extracts showed a scavenging activity toward the DPPH radical in a dose-dependent manner (2.5-15 mg/mL). EC
50 were 10 and 5 mg/mL for non biotransformed and biotransformed soy flour extracts, respectively. The increase in the antioxidant activity is explained by that the hydrolysis of
β-glucosidic linkage leads to liberation of hydroxyl groups in free aglycone which might be important to the antioxidant activity of the extract (
25).