Materials
Sumatriptan succinate (purity > 98 %) was kindly gifted by Damavand Darou Pharmaceutical company (Iran). CS (Mw 110, 000–150,000) commercial grade k-CA (k-CA; No. C-1013) consisting of predominantly k- and lesser amounts of λ-CA, and mannitol were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Water used in the experiments was deionized and produced using a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and supplied by Merck (Germany).
Preparation of k-CA /CS complex nasal inserts
k-CA/CS complex nasal inserts were prepared by ionic complexation, via electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged sulfate groups of k-CA and the positively charged amino groups of CS.
Briefly, k-CA was dissolved in water and CS was dissolved in acetate buffer pH 5.0, to obtain solutions of 2 % (w/v) concentration. The k-CA solution was then added to the CS solution in five different molar ratios (4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4; mol k-CA /mol CS), under magnetic stirring for 24 h at room temperature. The precipitates were separated using centrifugation at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 10 min (Hermle Z320, Germany), rinsed with water, and then homogenized at 17,500 rpm for 5 min with an Ultra-Turrax T 25 basic homogenizer (IKA-Werke, Germany). Subsequently, an aqueous solution of mannitol, a common bulking agent, was prepared and added slowly to the homogenized dispersed complexes with gentle stirring to achieve a theoretical complex/mannitol ratio of 9:1 (w/w), and then the resultant suspensions were stored at 4 °C overnight to get rid of air bubbles.
Finally, PEC gels were transferred into polypropylene micro-centrifuge tubes, (Eppendorf, Germany), frozen at −20 °C for 12 h, and then subjected to freeze-drying by an Alpha 1–2 LD plus Freeze Dryer (Martin Christ, Germany) at −55 to −60 °C and a vacuum level of 0.05 mbar for 24 h (
16).
When preparing loaded inserts, the procedure was the same as above, but sumatriptan succinate was dissolved in water and added to the solutions of PECs that allowed preparing inserts with three different drug/complex weight ratios (1:4, 1.5: 4, and 2: 4).
Besides, loaded inserts, comprised of only mannitol and sumatriptan succinate, were also prepared as control formulations for in-vitro release studies.
Physicochemical characterization
The prepared inserts were investigated in terms of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, drug content, water uptake ability, mucoadhesion potential, in-vitro release profile, and stability.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
The mid-IR spectra (4000 – 400 cm −1) of the powder samples (k-CA, CS, and the PEC containing equal amounts of both polymers) were recorded in the absorbance mode at a spectral resolution of 4 cm −1 via a Nicolet Magna 550 spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet, USA), having a germanium-coated potassium bromide (KBr) beam splitter and a deuterated triglycine sulphate (DTGS) detector.
Drug content
The loaded inserts (n = 10) were individually weighed and triturated to get homogeneous mixture. A quantity of powder, equivalent to the mass of one insert (30.0 mg), was extracted in 100.0 mL of ethyl alcohol and filtered through a filter paper (pore size 0.45 μm, Millipore, USA). The drug content was measured by UV spectroscopy (UV-mini 1240, Shimadzu, Japan) at λ max = 226 nm through a reference to an appropriate calibration curve of the sumatriptan succinate (R2 = 0.998).
Water uptake studies
A sponge (6 cm×6 cm×2 cm) was completely soaked in the hydration medium (phosphate buffers of pH 2, 5.5, and 7.4) and put on a petri dish, which was filled with the same medium to a 1 cm height, to be soaked over the study period. Circular filter paper (Whatman®, USA) was also soaked in the medium and laid on top of the sponge.
Following the equilibration period of 30 min, unloaded inserts (with various ratios of
k-CA and CS) were accurately weighed (100.0 mg) and positioned on the filter paper (
10).
Water uptake ability of the inserts was then calculated, as their weight increase after 6 h, using equation (
1), where W
T represents the total weight of hydrated formulation and moist filter paper, W
P is the weight of moist filter paper, and W
I represents the initial weight of the formulation (
10).
The effect of drug incorporation on the water uptake ability of the loaded inserts was also investigated at pH 5.5, which is close to the physiologically normal nasal pH.
Mucosadhesion studies
Preparation of the model mucosa (test surface)
The model mucosal membrane, utilized in this study, was sheep nasal mucosa. For this purpose, the septum and turbinates of the sheep’s nose, obtained from a local slaughter house, were fully exposed via a longitudinal cut along the nose. The mucosal membrane was carefully freed from the underlying cartilage and bone, and then frozen at -20 °C until required to prevent muscle contraction, therefore ensuring the flat and consistent surface, necessary for this type of adhesion experiment. When required for use, the tissue was permitted to thaw at 4 °C, chopped approximately into 4 cm length pieces, which were then washed gently with phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) to remove any residual nasal contents, and finally employed for the study.
Ex-vivo mucosaadhesion force
In order to investigate the mucoadhesive behavior of the inserts, a lab-fabricated apparatus, which was mainly similar to those described in previous studies, was utilized (
Figure 1) (
17,
18). The upper stationary platform of the apparatus was connected to a balance, determining the force required to detach the insert from the mucosa. The test cell was filled with phosphate buffer (pH 5.5), and kept at 37 °C to simulate the nasal physiological environment. The pieces of the nasal mucosa were mounted and fixed on the two cylindrical platforms (mucosal side upwards) with cyanoacrylate adhesive and left to equilibrate in this medium for 2 min. The inserts were separately positioned between the two mucosa-covered platforms, and maintained in place for 5 min. A continuous rising force of 0.1 g/sec was then applied on the adhesive joint developed between the insert and the mucosa, through slowly lowering the lower platform, to break the contact between these elements and the detachment force determined was recorded.
Schematic diagram of the apparatus used for assessing the mucoadhesive strength of the inserts
In-vitro release studies
The
in-vitro release of sumatriptan succinate from the loaded inserts was investigated using a lab-fabricated assembly, adapted in order to simulate the physiologic status of the nasal mucosa (
19). The lower end of a polypropylene tube (approximately 3.5 cm in inner diameter) was tightly closed with a filter paper (pore size 0.45 μm, Millipore, USA). The tube was vertically positioned into a release medium container, which was filled with 20.0 mL phosphate buffer (pH 5.5), and then adjusted so that the filter paper was wetted, but not submersed in the release medium. The loaded inserts (drug/complex weight ratio of 1.5:4) were located on the filter surface, and the whole assembly was closed with Parafilm® “M” (American National Can Company, USA) to prevent evaporation of the medium during the experiment and to establish a constant relative humidity to which the inserts were exposed to. The drug release study was carried out under 75 rpm magnetic stirring at 37 °C up to 6 h. At specific time points, aliquots (500 µL) were taken out from the release medium and the same amount was replenished with the fresh medium to ensure the maintenance of sink condition. The amount of drug released was assayed spectrophotometrically as described for the determination of drug content.
Stability studies
Physical stability studies were carried out based on International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines (
20). The loaded inserts were placed in polyethylene bottles and stored in a desiccator containing silica gel, which was maintained at 40 °C for 3 months. At regular time intervals, the inserts were investigated for any change in their appearance characteristics, such as shape and color, and drug content.
Statistical analysis
All the experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mean value ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed via the analysis of variance (ANOVA) by means of the SPSS 17.0 software, and the differences of P less than 0.05 were interpreted as denoting statistical significance.