Physicochemical properties of NPs
A W/O/W multiple emulsion solvent evaporation method is mostly used for the encapsulation of water-soluble drug and therefore was the method chosen for the water-soluble KF drug. The emulsions are usually prepared by emulsifying the aqueous phase containing the drug, in polymeric organic solution. The Resulted w/o emulsion is added to second aqueous solution containing emulsifier. The organic solvent diffuses out of the polymer phase and into the aqueous phase, and is then evaporated forming drug-loaded polymeric NPs. At the end, the uniform-sized beads were collected (
16). The organic solvent diffuses out of the polymer phase and into the aqueous phase, and is then evaporated forming drug-loaded polymeric NPs. At the end, the uniform-sized beads were collected (
16).
In solvent evaporation method, the polymer was dissolved in an organic solvent such as DCM, which was also used as a solvent for the PLGA polymer. The mixed polymer and drug solution (w
1/o) was then emulsified in an aqueous solution containing a surfactant or emulsifying agent to form an oil-in-water (o/w
2) emulsion. After the formation of a stable emulsion, the organic solvent was evaporated either by reducing the pressure or by continuous stirring. The particle size was influenced by the type and concentration of stabilizer, ultrasound power, and the polymer concentration (
17). In order to obtain small particle size, high-speed ultrasound or centrifugation could be employed (
18).
In the case of hydrophilic drugs, a multiple w
1/o/w
2 emulsion needed to be formed with the drug dissolved in the internal aqueous phase. In the coacervation technique, the coating precipitates onto a droplet of the drug (
18). Coacervation consists of three stages occurring under a constant agitation: (
1) a solution must be formed with three immiscible phases: the core material (active ingredient), the coating material, and a solvent; (
2) the liquid coating is deposited around the core material, which is achieved by mixing the coating phase with the solvent phase (in which the active ingredients reside); and (
3) the coating is hardened thermally or by desolvation (
19-
21)
Emulsion process produced PLGA spheres of 158-754.6 nm in diameter.
In the NPs provided through evaporation method, the amount of drug entrapped in the NPs was lower than the theoretical value. This represents that some free drug crystals were missed in the process of encapsulation out (
21,
22).
Morphology of NPs
Figure 2. shows SEM images of PLGA NPs. All preparations had homogenous distribution, spherical shape, and smooth surface characteristics. These spherical particles were in the range between 158 and 754.6 nm in size. They had high regular spatial arrangement and thus were described by an effective diameter. It has already been reported that particle size was proportional to the viscosity of the dispersed polymeric phase (O) . In fact viscosity of the dispersed phase was increased from F
1 (1:5) to F
3 (1:10). Particle size of NPs was directly proportional to the apparent viscosity of dispersed phase. When the dispersed phase with higher viscosity (F3 with 100 mg PLGA) was poured into the dispersion medium, bigger droplets were formed with larger mean particle size (754.6 nm).
Influence of drug: polymer ratio on the physical properties of NPs
Entrapment efficiency for different ratios of drug to PLGA polymer is shown in
Table 2. The lowest EE% (43%) is related to the lowest polymer concentration and the highest one (55%) belongs to formulation with low ratio of drug to polymer (
p < 0.05). The production yield of the NPs decreases (38.63%-67.68%) with the increase in the concentration of polymer (
22). The yields of NPs as the function of PLGA concentration has been shown in
Table 2. Although a satisfactory yield was obtained at PLGA lower concentrations (67.68%), the value decreased with the increase in the PLGA concentration.
With DCM, the particles have a bimodal population distribution and, consequently, a high polydispersity of 0.83 (
Table 2). Increasing the PLGA concentration in DCM from 5 mg/mL to 10 mg/mL changes the particle size distribution from unimodal to biomodal (
Table 2). Light Microscope Image shows the effective particle diameters for a range of PLGA concentrations in DCM (
Figure 1).
Bimodal distributions of particles were obtained with DCM at higher polymer concentrations.
The polymer concentration and organic solvent selection plays a critical role in producing unimodal NPs. NPs are formed through a true emulsification mechanism conducted by DCM, the water immiscible solvent. In this mechanism, an external energy is applied to break the larger emulsion droplets into smaller ones (
23). At higher polymer concentrations, the energy applied through ultrasound is insufficient to overcome the resistive viscous forces provided by the dissolved PLGA in the organic phase and the dissolved surfactant (PVA) in the aqueous phase leads to heterogeneous droplets and a bimodal size distribution.
The small polydispersity index suggested that the size distribution of the products is fairly monomodal. The above-mentioned monodispersed size distribution and excellent redispersability of NPs indicate that the surface of PLGA NPs is stabilized by some factors to prevent aggregation. Polydispersability was observed to be low, namely, in the range of 0.21 to 0.83.
Nanoparticles size and zeta potential analysis
The particle size and zeta potential values are reported in
Table 2. Particle size of formulations Fʹ
1 (1:5) ratio and Fʹ
3 (without sodium chloride) showed 889.6 and 935 nm, respectively. According of
Table 2. for F
1 and F
3 formulations, presence of NaCl decreased the mean particle size significantly (F
1 and F
3 with 158 and 754.6 nm, respectively). Increasing the osmotic pressure of w
2 (external phase of second emulsion) leads to water migration from w
1 to w
2 and a rapid shrinkage of the droplets. This phenomenon results in smaller nanoparticles (
24). The most likely rationale to justify the findings might be the adsorption of PVA onto the surface of PLGA NPs. Process parameters such as PLGA and PVA concentration were determined to achieve the optimum processing conditions based on this manufacturing technique. This was probably caused by increasing the viscosity and hence resulting in poor dispersion of the PLGA solution in the aqueous phase. At higher concentrations of PLGA (10 mg/mL), decreasing the coacervation of PVA on the NP surface could be the leading cause of lower yields (38.63%). This phenomenon could occur as a consequence of worse dispersion of PLGA solution into aqueous phase owing to the increase of viscosity of PVA solution. This process led to the formation of uniform population of NPs having mean diameter in the range of 158 to 754.6 nm and also improved the loading efficiency as evident from 43% entrapment efficiency with 55%. The above mentioned monodispersed size distribution and excellent redispersability of NPs represents that the surface of PLGA NPs is stabilized by some factors to prevent aggregation. The most likely rationale to justify the findings might be the absorption of PVA on to the surface of PLGA NPs (
25).
The zeta potential of an NP is commonly used to characterize the surface charge property of NPs. It shows that the electrical potential of particles is influenced by the composition of the particle and the medium in which it is dispersed. Currently principal technique involved in zeta potential determination is laser doppler anemometry. NPs containing zeta potential higher than (±) 30 mV have been demonstrated to be stable in suspension, since the surface charge hinders the aggregation of particles (
26). These might lead to stronger repulsive interactions among the particles, and thus, higher stability of the particles is reached (
27). Further, the zeta potential could be used to establish whether a charged active material is encapsulated within the center of the NPs or adsorbed onto the surface (
26). To optimize formulation parameters and to make predictions as well, the zeta potential measurement is made, regarding the storage stability of the colloidal dispersion (
28).
Zeta potential
Table 3 shows the values of the mean zeta potential of the prepared NPs. It was obvious that all formulae showed a surface negative charge with mean values ranging from -3.30 to -2.99 mV. The polymer type indicated that PLGA polymer had a negative value. This could be explained by the presence of free carboxylic acid end on the PLGA. It is worth mentioning that in case of PLGA the slightly negative charge on the surface may be attributed to the hydroxyl group of the PVA that was anchored on the surface of the NPs. The amphiphillic nature of the PVA leads to its entanglement in the polymer phase with their polar head group extruding out from the surface. This interaction is recorded to be strong and makes it difficult to be removed from the surface. Concerning the polymer mass and polymer ratio, it was shown that the higher polymer mass had a higher negative zeta potential as well as the higher polymer ratio (
29). This might be explained by the significant increase in particle size due to the use of higher polymer mass and ratio thus increasing the exposed charge on the surface of particles.
Light Microscope Image of double-emulsion solvent evaporation (W1/O/W2).
SEM images of ketotifen fumarate (KF) nanoparticles containing F3 (KF:PLGA) 1:10 ratio 50000x(A), F3 blank 50000x(B), F2 (KF:PLGA) 1:7.5 ratio 50000x(C), KF 20000x(D
DSC thermogram of Ketotifen fumarate (KF); PLGA; PVA; blank NPs of F3; F1 (KF:PLGA) 1:5 ratio; F2 (KF:PLGA) 1:7.5 ratio; F3 (KF:PLGA) 1:10 ratio, respectively
XRD thermogram of Ketotifen fumarate (Drug); PLGA (a); PVA (b); blank NPs of F3 (c); F1 (d); F2 (e); F3 (f), respectively
FTIR thermograms of PVA (a); KF (b); PLGA (c); F1 (KF:PLGA) 1:5 (d); F2 (KF:PLGA) 1:7.5(e); F3 (KF:PLGA) 1:10 (f); blank NPs of F3 (g); Physical mixture of F3(h), respectively
Cumulative percent release of KF from naoparticles with different polymers ratios and KF commercial tablet 10 mg
| Formulations | Drug:Polymer ratio | Initial emulsion (W1/O)
| Secondary aqueous phase(W2) |
|---|
Initial aqueousphase (W1)
| organic phase(O)
|
|---|
| Water(mL) | aKF(mg) | bPLGA(mg) | cDCM(mL) | dPVA (1%w/v)/eNaCl (0.8 %w/v)(mL) |
|---|
| F1 | 1:5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 25 |
| F2 | 1:7.5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 25 |
| F3 | 1:10 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 25 |
Ketotifen fumarate;
Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid);
Dichloromethane;
Polyvinyl alcohol;
Sodium chloride.
| Formulation code | Drug : Polymer ratio | Production yield (%±SD) | Theoreticaldrug content (%) | Meandrug entrapped(%±SD) | Drug loadingefficiency(%±SD) | Mean particlesize(nm) |
|---|
| F1 | 1:5 | 67.68±2.11 | 16.67 | 10.58±0.85 | 43.00±8.00 | 158 |
| F2 | 1:7.5 | 40.00±3.14 | 11.76 | 13.24±0.52 | 45.60±5.00 | 541.5 |
| F3 | 1:10 | 38.63±2.19 | 9.10 | 4.07±0.23 | 55.00±12.00 | 754.6 |
| *blank NPs of F3 | - | 40.00±2.47 | - | - | - | 237 |
Blank NPs of F3 (without drug) were prepared under the same conditions without drug.
| Samples | Zeta Potential(mV±SD) | Polydispersity Index(±SD) |
|---|
| Ketotifen fumarateF1F2F3Blank NPs of F3 | 6.68±0.00-3.30±3.21-3.19±8.21-2.99±1.72-19.2±0.00 | 0.68±0.000.21±0.290.51±0.000.83±0.060.25±0.00 |
| Formulation | aRel0.25(%) | bRel24(%) | cDE | dT50%(min) | ef1 |
|---|
| F1F2F3KF commercial Tab® | 15.81±3.0412.30±0.5210.67±0.2631.49±3.24 | 90.05±1.6086.40±7.4273.67±1.18100.36±2.22 | 74.4962.7254.0497.20 | 248.84352.61383.7445.47 | 44.6854.7263.380 |
Rel0.25 = amount of drug release after 0.25 h;
Rel24 = amount of drug release after 24 h;
DE = dissolution efficiency;
t 50% = dissolution time for 50% fractions;
f1 = Differential factor (0<f1<15).
| Formulation | ORDER | MPE% | RSQ | k | n | Slope | Intercept |
|---|
| F1 | Peppas | 2.58 | 0.882 | 0.122 | 0.090 | 0.090 | -2.102 |
| F2 | Non conventional order 2 | 48.94 | 0.878 | 0.000 | 1.143 | 0.000 | 0.028 |
| F3 | Non conventional order 2 | 28.55 | 0.907 | 0.000 | 1.143 | 0.000 | 0.018 |
| KF commercial Tab® | Non conventional order 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0941 | 0.446 | 0.446 | -2.363 |
Differential scanning calorimetry analysis
In order to study the crystalline or amorphous nature of formulations and to evaluate the interactions between drug, polymer, and other materials, DSC experiments were carried out (
Figure 3). According to
Figure 3. pure PLGA exhibits amorphous nature of PLGA polymer and no endotherms was observed in PLGA thermograms. The pure KF demonstrated a sharp peak at 201.24 °C which can be related to its melting point (
Figure 3). The absence of a melting transition phase event can also be observed in the analysis of DSC curves. It can be inferred that all the analyzed copolymers are amorphous, which is in agreement with the literature.
The DSC curve of NPs did not show the endothermic peak of KF. This suggests that the drug is incorporated into the NPs in a disordered and amorphous shape. Any severe alteration in the thermal behavior of either the polymer or the drug may be related to the drug-polymer interaction (
30). In the thermogram of the PLGA-based NPs, there was a small endothermic peak at 55.27-56.14 °C which corresponds to the phase transition of PVA (
Figure 3). Attending DSC thermograms, it is evident that the DSC curves of all NPs formulations are almost the same. In these curves, the peak of drug did not appear. This indicates that the KF might be dispersed/dissolved molecularly in the fused PLGA during the preparation of NPs (
31). Based on thermodynamic calculations on the enthalpy of this endothermic, considering the heat flow of PVA in NPs and blank NPs of F
3 (27.55, 13.44, 28.69 and 4.77 mJ for F
1, F
2, F
3 and Blank F
3 formulations respectively), the estimated loading of PVA in F
1, F
2, F
3 and blank F
3 formulations was calculated to be 26.29%, 12.83%, 27.38% and 4.55%, respectively.
X-ray diffraction analysis
The X-ray diffraction patterns reveal that the pure drug is crystalline in nature (
Figure 4). However, when it was incorporated into the polymer matrix, the main peaks of the drug disappeared. This could be attributed to the amorphous state of the drug in the NPs. When the NPs are prepared with varying drug to polymer ratios (F
1, F
2 and F
3), it is obvious that the NPs with lower polymer concentration would show similar peaks as the blank NPs. Some of the identifying peaks for KF are detectable at high concentration of polymer; though these peaks hold very low intensity due to the presence of lower concentration of drug in the sample compared to pure KF sample. This supports the results obtained from DSC.
Fourier transform spectroscopy analysis
The Fourier transform IR spectrum of KF alone showed that the principal peaks were observed at wave numbers stretching vibration N-H at 3424.64 cm−
1, aromatic stretching vibration C=C at 1649.70 cm−
1, bending vibration CH3 at 1476.99 cm-
1, bending vibration phenolic OH at 1397.14 and CH out of plane bending vibrations in substituted ethylenic system (-C=CH- (cis) at 754.15 cm
-1 (
Figure 5). The spectra obtained by FTIR for the PLGA are presented in
Figure 5. One can observe, in the spectra, the strong bands in the region between 1760 and 1750 cm
–1, due to stretch of the carbonyl groups presented in the PLGA. There are also stretching bands due to asymmetric and symmetric C-C(=O)-O vibrations between 1300 and 1150 cm
–1. The bands in these regions are of benefit in the characterization of esters. The 3525 and 3459 cm
–1 bands in the FTIR spectra for lactide and glycolide are ascribed to moisture in the sample (OH group). These spectra corroborate those given in the literature for PLGA copolymers (
32). The absorption bands between 3600 and 3400 cm
–1 in the spectra presented in
Figure 5, showing the hydroxyl group, indicates that the PLGA copolymers are hydrous.
In the FTIR, spectra of the blank NPs of F3 were observed at wave numbers 3436, 1651, 1477, 1396, and 756 cm-1. FTIR studies showed characteristic peaks of KF, confirming the purity of drug. FTIR spectral studies indicated there was interaction between KF and polymers used.
For NPs, stretching vibration N-H are seen at 3400-3423, stretch of the carbonyl groups at 1760, asymmetric and symmetric C-C(=O)-O vibrations at 1390 and bending vibrations in substituted ethylenic system (-C=CH- (cis) at 725-752 cm−1. Differences in the positions of the absorption bands of KF were observed in spectra of the prepared formulations, indicating that there are chemical interactions in the solid state between the drug and the polymer.
Release study
The release behavior of KF from PLGA NPs, illustrated in
Figure 6. indicates a biphasic pattern. Drug release profiles displayed a burst release in the first hour, followed by a lag phase and then sustained release appeared with the NPs. The drug release was more slowly occurred at a later stage, the rate of which might be controlled by the degradation speed of the polymer of NPs. It is worth noting that the degradation of polymer did not essentially occur, at least for the controlled period in the current system. KF encapsulated within PLGA, showed an initial burst of 10.67%-15.81% during the first 15 min, followed by a sustained release and until 24 h (73.67%-90.05), when most of the drug was (
Table 4). The primary burst might be the result of rapid release of drugs deposited on the surface and in the water channels in NPs, as the mass of the polymer did not decrease during this period.
When NPs were kept in a release solution, the PLGA was dissolved slowly to form holes or disintegrate to release the drug. Principally, the concentration of the polymer induces this release of drug from the NPs . The compact nature of the polymer coat around the drug sustains the drug release. Particle size is another factor which strongly affects the rate of dissolution and solubility. It is believed that the particle size is inversely proportional to rate of dissolution and hence a higher rate of dissolution (F
1>F
2>F
3 formulations) was observed with the developed NPs (
33,
34).
The drug was very gradually released at a later stage, the rate of which was determined by the diffusion (n < 0.5) of the drug in the inflexible matrix structure. The values of dissolution models suggest that the drug release occurs mainly through diffusion processes. Peppas and non-conventional order 2 kinetics models (
Table 5) shows the highest correlation; as it is evident from the values of regression coefficients (R
2 ) for F
1, F
2 and F
3 NPs as 0.882, 0.878, and 0.907, respectively (
35).
Conclusion
The present work showed the KF-containing NP formation by the double-emulsion solvent evaporation method. It demonstrated the potential process for controlling the size of PLGA NPs. The NP formation process was to be associated with the reduction of globule size due to the rapid evaporation of solvent and hence NPs of particle size were produced.
The size of droplets formation during the stage is an important factor. Variables such as drug to polymer ratio were found to be an important factor for the formation of PLGA NPs. Especially, the selected solvent such as DCM was used to dissolve the drug and significantly enhance the encapsulation of KF. PLGA encapsulated KF NPs yielded spherical shapes based on SEM results. The analysis of DSC and XRD patterns introduced well encapsulated compatible NPs as a drug carrier system. Release kinetics of KF, used as a model drug, showed sustained biphasic drug release governed by diffusion. The obtained results indicate the potential use of NPs accompanied with PLGA for the sustained release of KF. Optimization of formulations with different polymers and ocular applications are the future scope of study.