Materials
NM was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC-grade acetonitrile was obtained from Merck Chemical Company (Darmstadt, Germany). Water was prepared by a Millipore Milli-Q Plus Water Purification System. All other reagents used were of analytical grade. Hydrophilic Pluronic® block copolymers (PBC), including P85 and F127 were commercially available from BASF
(New Jersey. NJ, USA).
Preparation of NM-loaded polymeric micelles
Pluronic® P85 (0.6 g), Pluronic® F127 (0.4 g) and 2 mg NM were added simultaneously to the 10 mL deionized water and the solution was stirred at 100 rpm for 12 h at 25 °C. The precipitated NM was separated from the polymeric micelles solution by filtering through the 0.45 µM filter membranes (NYLON Membrane Filter, Vertical).
Chromatographic system and conditions
A Waters HPLC System (Waters Corporation, MA, USA), equipped with a Waters 600E Multi-solvent Delivery System, a Rheodyne injector and a Waters 486 Tunable Absorbance Detector, was used for the analysis. The separation was performed, using an Eurospher column (RP-C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, Knauer, Germany). An isocratic elution system was employed with a mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and water (70:30 v/v) which was freshly prepared and degassed by ultra-sonication. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min−1. The mobile phase was not allowed to recirculate during the analysis. Chromatograms were monitored by UV detection in the range of 200-400 nm and displayed at a single wavelength of 236 nm.
Preparation of artificial CSF
To prepare the artificial CSF (osmolarity of 320 mOsm, pH 7.4), 150 mM of NaCl, 3.5 mM of KCl, 2 mM of MgCl
2, 1.2 mM of CaCl
2, 10 mM of HEPES and 20 mM of glucose were added to 200 mL distilled water. The solution was stirred for 120 min at room temperature (
11).
Synthesis of NM oxide (OX-NM)
NM solutions were stored and analyzed in complete darkness. For the synthesis of OX–NM, 4 mg of MnO2 was added to 20 mL dichloromethane containing 1 mg of NM and the mixture was stirred overnight. The obtained solution was filtered and then purified by a column chromatographic method. The 1H and 13C NMR techniques were used to confirm the aromatization of the dihydropyridine (DHP) ring.
Standard solutions
Standard solutions were prepared at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 10 µg mL−1 of OX–NM by serial dilution with the artificial CSF.
Method validation
The developed method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, accuracy and precision (intra and inter-day variability), limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) and recovery according to the accepted guidelines (
12,
13).
a) Selectivity
In order to verify the selectivity of the method, blank natural CSF samples aspirated from three different rats and the prepared artificial CSF were analyzed by the procedure described above and possible interferences with the analytes were checked by visual comparing of the chromatograms with those obtained from the respective samples
b) Accuracy
To evaluate the accuracy of the method (measured as the percent recovery of OX–NM), solutions with concentrations of 3 and 7 µg/mL in three distinct sets of media, namely acetonitrile/water mixture (70:30 v/v), artificial CSF and CSF aspirated from rats, were prepared and analyzed by the HPLC technique. This procedure was performed in triplicate.
Furthermore, in order to reassure the consistency of the results obtained from the aspirated CSF with those from the artificial CSF, NM and OX–NM were dissolved in both media and the solutions, analyzed by the HPLC and the resulting chromatograms were inspected visually.
c) Precision
Within- and between-day precision of the method were determined by analyzing six replicates of samples on the same day and three different days, respectively, at three concentration levels (1, 2 and 5 μg/mL) of OX-NM in the artificial CSF and expressed as the relative standard deviations (% RSD) for each concentration level.
d) Linearity assessment
To evaluate the linearity of the HPLC method, calibration curves were constructed using freshly prepared spiked samples, over a concentration range of 0.5-10 µgmL−1 of OX–NM in the artificial CSF, and by plotting the peak-area versus the nominal concentration of OX-NM. Linearity of the method was established by the least-squares linear regression.
e) Limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD)
The quantification limit of an analytical procedure was considered as the lowest amount of the analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision (% RSD) and accuracy (% recovery). The detection limit was assessed as the lowest amount of the analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value.
Method application
A rat model was employed to evaluate the ability of the polymeric micelles for passing through the BBB. Adult male Wistar rats weighting between 200-250 g were supplied by Experimental Animal Laboratory of School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran). Animals were provided with a standard laboratory diet and all experiments were carried out in accordance with guidelines evaluated and approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran). Drug-loaded polymeric micelles were injected intraperitoneally (IP) in 3 animals and after 40 minutes, their spinal fluids were aspirated (
14) and assayed by the HPLC method described.