68Ge/
68Ga generator was eluted with suprapure HCl (0.6 M, 6 mL) in 0.5 mL fractions. The two fractions with the highest
68GaCl
3 (700-900 MBq) activity were generally used for labeling purposes. The MAA kits were obtained from Pars-Isotope Company (TCK-Pars-1800) which contain 3mg HAS (human serum albumin). All other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. U.K. Whatman paper No. 2 was obtained from Whatman (UK). Radio-chromatography was performed by Whatman paper using a thin layer chromatography scanner, Bioscan AR 2000, Paris, France. The activity of the samples were measured by a p-type coaxial high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector (model: EGPC 80-200R) coupled with a multichannel analyzer system. Calculations were based on the 511 keV peak for
68Ga. All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD). Animal studies were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom biological council´s guidelines on the use of living animals in scientific investigations, second edition (
15).
Size measurements
The particle size distributions were measured via sedimentation in Andreasen cylinders and via laser diffraction (using the Fraunhofer approximation) on a Fritsch Particle Sizer Analysette 22 Nanotec (Fritsch Laborgerätebau GmbH, Germany). The size of the particles was measured pre and post labeling.
Preparation of MAA from MAA kits
The general procedure for the preparation of
99mTc labeled commercial human serum MAA kits was based on and similar to the process described by previous studies (
11,
16,
17). Each kit was suspended in 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride and vigorously mixed for 15 min to make the particles free of additional compounds such as stannous chloride dihydrates. After centrifuges (at 4000 rpm for 5 min), the supernatants were wasted and the retained particles were reconstituted in 0.3–0.5 mL sterile water and ready for radioactive labeling.
Labeling of MAA with 68Ga
The MAA particles were mixed with 1.5 mL of 68Ge/68Ga generator eluted (contains 600MBq) and the pH adjusted to 4 with 500 mg of HEPES buffer. The mixture was allowed to react and stirred gently for 8 min at 75 °C. The labeled compound then quenched via 10 mL of sterile water. In order to purify the 68Ga-MAA and get rid of free 68Ga the sample were centrifuged again for 5 min (at 4000 rpm) and supernatant were squandered.
Determination of labeling yields
In order to determine the labeling yields, we used different methods of radio thin layer chromatography (RTLC) to determine the radioactive labeling yields. We used RTLC on silica gel impregnated glass fiber sheets as the stationary phase and 0.9% NaCl solution as the mobile phase. The
68Ga labeled with MAA remained at the start position and the free
68Ga migrated with the solvent front. The percentages of each fraction were determined relative to the total activity of the chromatogram (
Figure 1). As represented in
Figure 1, the labeling yield was about 95% therefore we considered to centrifuge the compound again for 5 min (at 4000 rpm). The RTLC results showed that there is no free activity.
Animal Models
For biodistribution evaluation of the 68Ga-MAA, normal female wild-type rats were used (purchased from Razi Institute, Karaj, Iran). During the entire study, autoclaved food and drinking water were available ad libitum
Biodistribution and Imaging in wild-type rats
The distribution of radiolabeled complex (15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 min) among tissues was determined in wild-type rats. The total amount of radioactivity injected into each rat was measured by counting the syringe before and after injection in a dose calibrator with fixed geometry. The rats were sacrificed using the animal care protocols at selected times after injection. Blood samples were rapidly taken from the rats’ aorta after scarification. The tissues (heart, lung, intestine, skin, stomach, kidneys, spleen, liver, muscle, urine, carcass and bone) were weighed and rinsed with normal saline and their specific activities were determined with an HPGe detector (count 3 times) and the percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of each organ was measured (
18,
19).
Measurement of activity
The activity in the syringes was measured before and after administration of the radiopharmaceutical with well-type ionization chamber (CRC-15R, Capintec, USA N.J.). All samples were background subtracted, the decay correction was not performed and then similar samples were averaged together (
20).
For each of these measurements, three samples (from each organ) were weighed and then counted by HPGe to determine the percentage of injected dose per gram (which was equivalent to the percentage of injected activity per gram %IA/g≡%ID/g); all the organ activity measurements were normalized to injected activity. Uncertainties in the determinations were minimal because each assay collected at least 10,000 counts, which results the standard deviation (SD) of less than 1%. In all the measurements, we tried to keep same geometry and volume in order to prevent overestimation and underestimation in dose measurements. All samples became background subtracted and decay correction was not considered for all measurements and the similar samples were averaged together (
18,
21).
The HPGe detector gave us the counts, therefore we used the below formula to convert the counts into the activity (
22):
Where t is the time of counts and Eff is the efficiency of the detector for the selected energy and Br is the decay yield of selected energy (512 keV) for the 68Ga.
The 68Ga activity concentration at time t, %ID/g (t) was then calculated as the percentage of injected activity per gram of tissue (%IA/g).
Where A
tissue is the
68Ga activity in the sample, M
tissue is the mass of the sample and A
total is the total activity of
68Ga injected into the rat (
23,
24).
PET scan imaging
The rats were anesthetized with ketamine 50 mg/kg and xylazine 5 mg/kg; the
68Ga-MAA was injected into the rats’ tail vein (
25). Static PET/CT imaging of the first rat was performed 50 min after 6.66 MBq injection of
68Ga- MAA on the SIEMENS Biograph 6 clinical PET/CT scanner (
26). The decay corrected acquisition protocol was set to 15 min per bed position.
Figure 3 shows the distribution of
68Ga-MAA in the first rat via PET/CT and PET MIP images.
| Organ | 68Ga-MAA
|
|---|
| 1 min | 5 min | 10 min | 15 min | 20 min | 25 min | 35 min | 40 min | 45 min |
|---|
| Bladder | 11990 | 45092 | 55371 | 61601 | 67875 | 54429 | 94294 | 81037 | 22838 |
| R. Kidney | 32354 | 22703 | 15795 | 14808 | 13282 | 12653 | 11905 | 10603 | 9561 |
| L. Kidney | 28374 | 20763 | 16618 | 14189 | 11945 | 12693 | 11362 | 12145 | 8703 |
| Lungs | 145166 | 145371 | 147475 | 131815 | 142757 | 122164 | 110887 | 107585 | 97605 |
The RTLC results (on the right sides) and the Fritsch Particle sizer results (left side) of the MAA a) after labeling with 68Ga b) after first centrifuge and c) after 2 times centrifuge post labeling. The X and Y axises for the Fritsch Particle sizer were the mean size diameter and the intensity, respectively
Biodistribution of 68Ga-MAA after 1 and 2 times centrifuge post labeling (the data were decay corrected) at various time points (from 15 to 120 min) post injection
Static PET/CT fused image (left) and PET MIP image (right) of 68Ga-MAA in the first rat 50 min after injection show significant accumulation of 68Ga-MAA in lungs. The injected dose was 6.66 MBq
Dynamic PET/CT fused images of 68Ga-MAA in the second rat during the first minute after injection show quick absorption of 68Ga-MAA in lungs and both kidneys. The injected dose was 1.85 MBq
Dynamic PET/CT fused images of 68Ga-MAA in the second rat after 5, 15, 30 and 40 min after injection. The activity was extracted by the kidneys to the bladder
Dynamic PET/CT images were acquired for 45 min in list mode (32 bit) format a few sec after injection (
Figures 4 and
5). In all of the acquisitions, the rats were placed in supine position and CT scans performed for anatomical reference and attenuation correction (spatial resolution 1.25 mm, 80 kV, 150 mAs) with a total CT scanning time of 20 sec.
Reconstruction was performed using the TrueX algorithm (including resolution recovery) with attenuation correction. The reconstruction settings were 2 iterations and 21 subsets to a 336×336 matrix. Images were filtered with Gaussian filter of 5mm full-width half maximum (FWHM). Transmission data were reconstructed into a matrix of equal size by means of filtered back-projection, yielding a co-registered image set (
26).