Materials
1,9-Pyrazoloanthrone (≥ 98% HPLC grade) and Rasagiline were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis USA). Phosphatidylcholine, stearic acid, cholesterol, ethanol and diethyl ether were purchased from Himedia Biosciences, India. Ammonium acetate, trisaminomethane (Tris), sodium chloride, potassium chloride, ammonia solution, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate of analytical grade were procured from SD Fine chemicals (Mumbai, India). Milli-Q water was obtained using a Milli-Q RO system with a 0.2 µm filter (Millipore India, Bangalore, India).
Cell culture
SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were obtained from National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India and maintained in humidified atmosphere of 95% air, 5% CO2, at 37 °C. Cells were then cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, penicillin (100 IU/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (5 µg/mL).
Methods
Liposome Preparation
Liposomes were prepared by the solvent (ether) injection technique using ultrasonication. This method involves the dissolution of the lipid into an organic phase (ether), followed by the injection of the lipid solution into aqueous media, thereby forming liposomes (
15,
16). About 10 mg of phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and stearic acid (1:1:1 ratio) were dissolved in ether and stirred using magnetic stirrer for 30 min. This mixture was then added drop by drop using a disposable syringe into preheated Tris KCl buffer (pH 7.4) at 60 °C by ultrasonic homogenizer (Labsonic M, Braun Biotech International, Sartorius, Germany). After cooling, the organic solvent was evaporated overnight and the placebo liposomes were obtained. For 1,9-P encapsulation, 10 mg of 1,9-P was dissolved in Tris KCl buffer (pH 7.4) and liposomes were prepared as mentioned above. After preparation, the 1,9-P loaded liposomes aqueous suspension was stored in a dark place at 4 °C and later used for further studies.
| Formula | Phosphatidyl Choline | Stearic Acid | Cholesterol | Size (nm) | Zeta Potential | Entrapment efficiency (%) | PDI |
|---|
| F1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 365.1 ± 4.26 | -10.24 | 72.21 ± 0.69 | 0.294 ± 0.014 |
| F 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 359.4 ± 3.74 | -7.98 | 67.45 ± 0.41 | 0.312 ± 0.018 |
| F 3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 451.2 ± 6.94 | -13.54 | 68.12 ± 0.34 | 0.348 ± 0.023 |
| F 4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1005.0 ± 5.34 | -24.87 | 69.14 ± 0.87 | 0.412 ± 0.034 |
| F 5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1176.4 ± 6.34 | -20.14 | 76.34 ± 0.34 | 0.481 ± 0.053 |
| F 6 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1642.0 ± 4.56 | -24.32 | 84.89 ± 0.47 | 0.546 ± 0.048 |
| F 7 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1247.4 ± 3.78 | -21.24 | 81.56 ± 0.25 | 0.445 ± 0.039 |
| F 8 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 210.0 ± 2.01 | -16.42 | 70.47 ± 0.93 | 0.414 ± 0.028 |
| F 9 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 158.47 ± 1.06 | -15.21 | 76.32 ± 0.24 | 0.301 ± 0.019 |
| F 10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 112.33 ± 0.84 | -19.40 | 78.96 ± 0.28 | 0.286 ± 0.012 |
| Parameter | 1,9-P suspension
| 1,9-P liposome
|
|---|
| Brain | Plasma | Brain | Plasma |
|---|
| Cmax (ng/mL or g) | 695.68 ± 59.67 | 8946.21 ± 180.46 | 2143.84 ± 126.98 | 7448.55 ± 192.54 |
| AUC (0-12 h) (ng h/mL or g) | 2083.48 ± 81.32 | 30143.75 ± 294.63 | 10050.85 ± 212.14 | 47439.71 ± 352.12 |
| AUC (0-inf) (ng h/mL or g) | 2174.92 ± 94.22 | 30456.083 ± 310.89 | 10150.94 ± 164.23 | 50481.71 ± 410.27 |
| T1/2 (h) | 1.576 ± 0.08 | 1.029 ± 0.03 | 1.451 ± 0.04 | 2.622 ± 0.09 |
| Tmax (h) | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2 |
| Kel (1/h) | 0.439 ± 0.01 | 0.673 ± 0.02 | 0.477 ± 0.01 | 0.264 ± 0.01 |
| MRT (h) | 3.310 ± 0.12 | 2.3344 ± 0.08 | 3.806 ± 0.09 | 4.926 ± 1.04 |
| Parameter | Heart | Liver | Lungs | Kidney | Spleen |
|---|
| Cmax (ng/g) | 420.08 ± 80.44 | 1929.79 ± 81.06 | 1039.13 ± 42.15 | 2150.47 ± 55.15 | 355.12 ± 30.44 |
| AUC (0-12 h) (ng h/g) | 1263.60 ± 115.74 | 9507.60 ± 214.98 | 3709.19 ± 189.45 | 9749.17 ± 219.64 | 1529.56 ± 126.34 |
| AUC (0-inf) (ng h/g) | 1301.92 ± 120.07 | 9805.36 ± 246.37 | 3732.71 ± 192.48 | 9781.08 ± 224.68 | 1772.35 ± 130.24 |
| T1/2 (h) | 1.285 ± 0.09 | 2.20 ± 0.14 | 1.340 ± 0.12 | 1.241 ± 0.10 | 2.563 ± 0.15 |
| Tmax (h) | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Kel (1/h) | 0.539 ± 0.14 | 0.314 ± 0.01 | 0.517 ± 0.01 | 0.558 ± 0.12 | 0.270 ± 0.01 |
| MRT (h) | 3.049 ± 1.04 | 4.092 ± 1.27 | 3.467 ± 1.21 | 3.096 ± 1.08 | 4.705 ± 1.84 |
Representative chromatographs of a) Blank plasma, b) Plasma spiked with liposomes and IS, c) Plasma sample after oral administration of liposomes, d) Blank tissue of brain, e) Brain tissue spiked with liposomes and IS, f) Brain tissue sample after oral administration of liposomes
A) The average diameter of 1,9-P liposomes; (B) Zeta potential distribution of 1,9-P liposomes
FTIR spectra of (A) Liposomes; (B) Phosphatidylcholine; (C) Cholesterol; (D) Steric acid; (E) 1,9-Pyrazoloanthrone
A) SEM images of 1,9-P liposome with surface morphology; (B) TEM images of 1,9-P liposome
In-vitro release profile of 1,9-P pure drug suspension and liposomal formulation. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 3
A) Cytotoxic assessment of 1,9-P liposome by MTT assay in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line (B) Protective effect of 1,9-P liposome in SH-SY5Y cell line pretreated for 18 h and incubated with 6-OHDA (150 µM) for 6 h. Cell viability are expressed as percentage of the control. Values are indicated as the mean ± SD. ***p < 0.001 compared with control group, ### p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01, # p < 0.05 compared with the 6-OHDA-only treated group
Estimation of apoptosis after 18 h of pretreatment with 1,9-P liposomes and incubated with 6-OHDA (150 µM) for 6 h cells with AO/EB staining were observed under fluorescence microscope. (A) Control with vehicle treatment; (B) 6-OHDA (150 µM) treated; (C) 6-OHDA (150 µM) + 1,9-P liposome 1 µg/mL; (D) 6-OHDA (150 µM) + 1,9-P liposome 2.5 µg/mL; (E) 6-OHDA (150 µM) + 1,9-P liposome 5 µg/mL; (F) 6-OHDA (150 µM) + 1,9-P liposome 10 µg/mL
Concentration-time curves in (A) Plasma and brain after IP administration of 1,9-P liposome; (B) Plasma and brain after IP administration of 1,9-P suspension. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 4).
Concentration-time curve for various tissue after IP administration of 1,9-P liposomes. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 4
Ultra force liquid chromatography (UFLC) analysis
Quantification of 1,9-P in liposome, plasma and tissue samples was performed using a UFLC instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a model series LC-20AD pump, a Rheodyne 7752
i injector with a 20 µL loop and SPD-M20A PDA detector. The separation was carried out by a Hibar C
18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm; ID, 5 µm) (
17). Lab solution chromatography software was used for acquisition of data. The mobile phase consists of ammonium acetate (10 mM, pH 8.0 adjusted with ammonia) and acetonitrile (ACN) (43:57, v/v) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and Rasagiline (150 µg/mL) was used as an internal standard (IS). The injected sample volume was 20 µL and detection wavelength (210 nm) kept constant throughout the experiment. Before the use, mobile phase was filtered through a 0.22 µm hydrophilic membrane filter and sonicated for 10 min. The whole experiment was performed at room temperature (15-18 °C). The UFLC method was validated according to USFDA guidelines (
18) for linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), intra-day, and inter-day validation with precision and accuracy.
Determination of Entrapment efficiency
The indirect method was adopted for determination of 1,9-P entrapment. The 1,9-P liposomes were ultracentrifuged (Spectrafuge, Labnet International, New Jersey) at a speed of 10,000 rpm for 30 min. Then supernatant was collected for UFLC analysis (n = 3) to quantify the unentrapped quantity of 1,9-P. The entrapment efficiency was calculated by using the following Equation (
19).
Where EE is the entrapment efficiency, Ctotl the total quantity of 1,9-P used to prepare the 1,9-P liposomes, and Cfree is the free quantity of 1,9-P in the supernatant.
Characterization of liposomes
Particle Size determination
The mean particle size, zeta potential, and size distribution [polydispersity index (PDI)] of liposomes were measured by Zetasizer ZS 2000 (Malvern Instruments, UK), based on photon correlation spectroscopy technique that analyzes the fluctuations in dynamic light scattering (DLS) due to brownian motion of the particles (
20).
Morphology
Surface morphology of the liposomes was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for roughness, shape, and size. The external surface morphology of lyophilized drug loaded liposomes was recorded using SEM (FEI QUANTA 200 SEM/EDAX, UK) at 20 kV as an accelerating voltage (
21). The samples were prepared by placing a drop of liposome suspension on an aluminium stub with double-sided adhesive tape. The tape was firmly attached to the stub and the lyophilized sample was scattered carefully over its surface. The stub with the sample was then sputter coated with a thin layer of gold to make the sample conductive; subsequently, the samples were subjected to SEM analysis. For TEM analysis, samples were diluted 100 times with double distilled water and a drop of liposome suspension was placed on the copper grid and dried over night at room temperature to remove excess moisture. The samples were analyzed using TEM (TOPCON 002B, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV (
22).
Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy
The liposomes were separated from the liposome suspension by centrifugation and dried under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. Dried liposomes, cholesterol, phosphatidylcholine, stearic acid, and the physical mixture of these components were mixed with KBr powder separately and made into pellet at 10,000-12,000 kg/cm
2 hydraulic pressure. Spectra were acquired in transmission mode on a Shimadzu FTIR 8400S FTIR spectrometer (Kyoto Tokio, Japan) (
23).
In-vitro release studies
The release of 1,9-P from liposomes and drug suspension was performed using the dialysis bag method (
24). An appropriate volume (4 mL) of liposomal suspensions equivalent to 1 mg/mL was sealed in a dialysis bag (Dialysis membrane-150, HiMedia, Mumbai, India) having pore size of 2.4 nm and molecular weight cut off at 12,000-14,000 Dalton measuring 5 cm length and 2.1 cm width. The dialysis bags were placed in 50 mL PBS (pH 6.8, 37 °C) and stirred constantly at 100 rpm.
The 500 µL aliquots of the sample were withdrawn from the dissolution medium at each time interval and the same volume of fresh pre-warmed dissolution medium was replaced to maintain the sink condition. The release of free 1,9-P suspension was also done at the same condition as above. The samples were analyzed for drug content by UFLC (n = 3).
The raw data obtained from the
in-vitro drug release studies were fit to various kinetic equations (
25) such as zero order (cumulative% release
vs. time), first order (log% drug remaining
vs. time) and Higuchi’s model (cumulative% drug release
vs. square root of time). Values of
r2 and
k were calculated for the linear curve obtained by regression analysis of the above plots. The exact mechanism of drug was determined by the Korsemeyer-Peppas model (log drug release
vs. log time) (
26).
In-vitro cytotoxicity assay
Cell culture and treatment
The viability studies of drug loaded liposomes were carried out in SH-SY5Y cells, a human neuroblastoma cell line (
27). The cells were seeded in 96 well plates at a density of 2-5 × 10
5 cells/well for 24 h. The culture medium was changed every three days, cells were sub-cultured about twice a week. After cells were about 80% confluent, they were incubated with 1,9-P liposomes (1-100 µg/mL) for 18 h prior to 6-OHDA addition to the medium. Then cells were treated with 150 µM of 6-OHDA and then cultured for the last 6 h of 1,9-P liposome treatment.
Measurement of cell viability
Cell viability was evaluated by quantitative colorimetric assay using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), showing the mitochondrial activity of living cells (
28). MTT reagent at 1 mg/mL was dissolved in medium and added in each well and cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. After incubation, medium was removed out and formazan crystals were dissolved by isopropanol with shaking and the absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 570 nm wavelength.
Measurement of apoptotic cell death by EB/AO staining
SH-SY5Y cells were incubated at a density of 0.5-2.0 × 10
6 cells/mL with 1,9-P liposomes at the IC
50 concentration for 18 h prior to addition of 6-OHDA in medium. The cells were treated with 150 µM of 6-OHDA and subsequently cultured for the last 6 h. Cell suspension was washed with PBS and resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. The cells were then stained using dual staining technique with a mixture of acridine orange and ethidium bromide (1 µg/mL each) for 10 min at 37 °C. The cells were further washed with 1 mL of ice cold PBS at 4 °C to prevent further diffusion of dye. The stained cells were centrifuged in a cooling centrifuge at 1200 rpm for 4 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in minimum quantity of PBS and 10 µg of cell suspension was spotted on a cover slip and viewed in a phase contrast fluorescent microscope (Ex 500, Emi 530) to visualize apoptotic cells (
29). 6-OHDA 150 µM was used as a negative control, 1,9-P liposome (1-10 µg/mL) as a treatment groups and cells without any treatment were used as control.
Pharmacokinetics and Tissue distribution study
The
in-vivo pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution studies of 1,9-P were carried out on Wistar rats weighing 180-220 g. The animal house was well ventilated and the animals were maintained on a 12:12 h light and dark cycle in large specious cages throughout the experiment. The animals were provided with food and water
ad libitum and fasted for 12 h before starting the experiment. The experimental protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) of JSS College of Pharmacy, Udhagamandalam, Tamilnadu, India (JSSCP/IAEC/PH.D/PH.COLOGY/04/2014-2015). Sixty-two Wistar rats were randomly assigned into nine groups of four animals in each group for 1,9-P liposome and 1,9-P suspension as per time interval. The liposomal formulation of 1,9-P and pure drug were suspended in Tris KCl buffer (pH 7.4) and then administered by intraperitoneal (IP) route to rats at a dose equivalent to 15 mg/kg based on earlier studies (
6). Aliquots of approximately 0.5 mL of blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture at time intervals of 0 min (pre-dose), 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 12 h post-dose. The vital organs of interest were collected immediately after cervical dislocation at the above prescribed time periods and weighed accurately. The tissues were washed with Tris KCl buffer (pH 7.4) to remove blood, blotted dry with tissue paper and stored at -70 ± 2 °C until analysis. The estimation of 1,9-P in plasma and tissues by UFLC was carried out at optimized chromatographic conditions.
The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis after obtaining or calculating extravascular input of individual concentration-time data using pK solver software (AGAH working group PK/PD modelling). The pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were obtained directly from the plasma concentration time curve. The elimination rate constant (Kel) was calculated from parameters of the multiexponential fit of the plasma concentration-time profile; elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/Kel; area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0–12 h) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and area under the curve from 0 h extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–inf) was calculated as AUC (0–12 h) + Cz/Kel where Cz represents the observed or calculated plasma concentration at the last measurable sampling time. All the values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation except for the Tmax, which is expressed as the median.
Statistical analysis
Data analyses were performed with Graphpad Prism version 6.0 (Graphpad Software Inc., La Jolla, USA) software; results are expressed as mean ± SD for the observed values. Mean values of different groups were compared employing one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. Statistical significance between groups was considered if the p-value was < 0.05.