Animals
Adult male Wistar rats (200–230 g) were obtained from our own breeding colony. They were housed in groups of six animals per cages with free access to food and water. They were maintained on a 12 h-light/dark cycle (light on at 07:00), at a temperature of 23 ± 1 °C. All experiments were carried out according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institute of Health (NIH Publications No. 8523, revised in 1985). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.
Plant extraction
Nepeta menthoides (aerial part) was obtained from Tehran botanical market and authenticated in the Herbarium of Faculty of Traditional Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in comparison with original samples. According to the policy of the herbarium, no specific number is given for such a sampling but the sample is kept for occasional checking
during the study. Water extract of the herb was prepared by infusion and was concentrated in a vacuum rotary evaporator (Buchi, Switzerland) and was left to dry in a desiccator. The yield of extraction (w/w) was 23% which was calculated as weight of dry extract/weight of dry starting materialˣ100. The extract was diluted at desirable concentrations in normal saline prior to injections.
Cold-water-induced hypothermia
According to two studies on the impact of cold-water swimming on brain temperature (
9,
10), we utilized 3.5 °C cold-water to induce hypothermia. Rats in cold-water-induced hypothermic (CWH) groups were immersed up to the neck in 3.5 ± 0.5 °C water of 20 cm depth in a 35 cm diameter plastic container, for 5 min during 14 consecutive days. After each intervention, rats were left to dry at room temperature 23 ± 2 °C and returned to the cages. For control groups,
rats were forced to swim in warm water (32 °C) at the same conditions. After last swimming in day 14, some groups received drug or vehicle (details are presented in
Table 1). To eliminate the impact of forced swimming stress, a group of intact rats was also added. All procedures were carried out on day time. 24 hours after last intervention, spatial learning and memory was assessed using Morris water maze test.
| Group name | Intervention |
|---|
| CWH (Hypothermic), n=17 | cold-water-swimming for 14 consecutive day |
| Ctr (Control), n=17 | warm-water swimming for 14 consecutive day |
| CWH + 100, n=8 | cold-water-swimming for 14 consecutive day plus singlei.p. injection of Nepeta menthoides (100 mg/kg) |
| CWH + 500, n=6 | cold-water-swimming for 14 consecutive day plus singlei.p. injection of Nepeta menthoides (500 mg/kg) |
| Ctr + 100, n=6 | warm-water swimming for 14 consecutive day plussingle i.p. injection of Nepeta menthoides (100 mg/kg) |
| CWH + vehicle, n=6 | cold-water-swimming for 14 consecutive day plus singlei.p. injection of normal saline |
| Ctr + vehicle, n=6 | warm-water swimming for 14 consecutive day plussingle i.p. injection of normal saline |
| Intact rats, n=10 | No intervention |
Water maze task
Apparatus. The water maze was consisted of a pool (155 cm diameter) filled with water (23 ±1 °C) until 15 cm from the edge of the tank. A transparent Plexiglas platform (10 cm diameter) was located 1.5 cm below the water surface in the tank’s southeastern quadrant (target quadrant, Q1). The platform was the only escapable thing from the water. The walls surrounding the pool were decorated with distinct extra maze cues. These cues were kept in the fixed positions with respect to the swimming pool during the whole experiment to allow the animals finding the hidden platform.
Animal movements was recorded by a CCD camera (Panasonic Inc., Japan) hanging from the ceiling above the MWM apparatus and locomotion tracking was measured by the Ethovision software (version XT7, Netherland), a video tracking system for automated analyzing of animal’s behavior.
Protocol. The protocol was a modified version previously described by Frick
et al. (
11). In brief, learning step consisted of 60 s swimming for adaptation, and twelve trials, organized into three blocks of four trials separated by 30 min. Each animal was given a maximum of 60 s to reach to the platform, upon which it remained for 10 s. If the platform was not located within 60 s, the animal was placed on it by the experimenter. The next trial started immediately after removal from the platform. Escape latencies to find the hidden platform and swimming speeds were recorded in each trial for subsequent analysis.
Twenty four hours after last training trial, the spatial probe test was given. In spatial probe test, the platform was removed, and rats were allowed to swim for 60 s before they were removed. Animals were released in the water in a location that was exactly opposite from where the platform was placed. Behavior was recorded with the video tracking system and time spent in Q1was recorded.
After the probe trial, the platform was elevated above the water surface, covered by bright color aluminum foil, and placed in a different quadrant (northwestern quadrant). Rats were allowed to swim and find the visible platform during 60 s for four times in order to test their visual ability. All experiments were conducted between 10:00 and 15:00.
Tissue preparation and biochemical analyses
After behavioral tests, animals were sacrificed by cervical translocation, and the brains were removed from the skulls. The hippocampus tissue was separated from each hemisphere and was snapfrozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C to time of biochemical analysis.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed on hippocampi homogenates to determine Tau hyperphosphorylation levels. Briefly, the whole hippocampus was homogenized in four times the volume–weight of lysis buffer (Tris–HCl 50 mM, NaCl 150 mM, Triton X-100 0.1%, sodium deoxycholate 0.25%, SDS 0.1%, EDTA 1 mM, protease and phosphatase inhibitor) and the total protein extract was then obtained by centrifugation for 15 min at 12000 rpm at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay, and equivalent amounts (60 μg) of each sample were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. The proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore), for assessment of Phospho-Tau Ser 396, Total Tau, and β-actine, by using Bio-Rad immunoblotting apparatus. Afterward, the membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 75 min at room temperature and then were incubated at 4 °C for 3 h with
Purified rabbit polyclonal anti-tau antibody PS396 (phosphor-Ser396; 1:800 v/v, Signalway Antibody), anti total tau (1:800 v/v, Signalway Antibody), and β-actin rabbit monoclonal antibody (1:1,000 v/v; cell signaling). The membranes were washed three times with 0.1% Tween 20 and TBS and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated gout anti- rabbit secondary antibodies (cell signaling) (1:10,000 v/v). The immunoreactive band signal intensity was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Plus, GE Healthcare Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The relative expression of the protein bands was quantified by scanning of the X-ray films and densitometric analysis with ImageJ software.
Statistics
All collected data were analyzed using the SPSS for Windows (Version 16). To compare first and third training blocks of each group, one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc test was used to compare different experimental groups in each training trial and also to compare the time spent in target quadrant (Q1) as a measure of memory retrieval, by each group in the probe test. One-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc analysis was also used to compare the levels of phosphorylated tau between different experimental groups. A P<0.05 was considered significant. All error bars in figures are ± SEM (Standard Error of Mean).