Chemistry
Melting points were determined on Electrothermal Capillary apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were obtained using a Perkin-Elmer Model 1000. One H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was obtained on Bruker Ac-80 spectrophotometer and chemical shifts () are in ppm relative to internal tetramethylsilane. C, H, N analyses were within ± 0.4% of theoretical values. Title compounds 3a-d were sensitive to light and all chemical procedures involving these were shielded from light whatever present. Compounds 2a-d was prepared as described previously (
16).
3,3,6,6-Tetramethyl-9-[1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-2-(methylthio)-5-imidazolyl]-2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10- octahydro-1,8-acridinedione [3a]
A mixture of ammonium acetate (0.32 g, 0.41 mmol), 2a (1 g, 0.41 mmol) and 5, 5-dimethyl- 1,3-cyclohexanedione (1.18 g, 0.84 mmol) in methanol (15 mL) was protected from light and refluxed overnight. Then the residue was poured in ice-water. The obtained precipitate was filtered to give 0.4 g of 3a , m.p. 111.1°C, yield 88.7%; IR (KBr): 1630 cm-1 (C=O); 1H nmr (DMSO-d6): δ 7.83-6.80 (m, 6H, arom, NH, H4-imidazole), 6.20 (s, H4-DHP), 5.00 (s, 2H, CH2N), 2.80-1.80 (m, 11H, CH2, CH3S), 1.00 ppm (s, 12H, CH3).
Anal. Calcd. for C28H32FN3O2S: C, 68.13; H, 6.53; N, 8.51.Found: C, 68.09; H, 6.63; N, 8.48.
3,3,6,6-Tetramethyl-9-[1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-2-(ethylthio)-5-imidazolyl]-2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10- octahydro-1,8-acridinedione [3b]
This compound was prepared from 2b similar to 3a, m.p. 95.86 °C , yield 94.2% ; IR (KBr): 1632cm-1 (C=O); 1H nmr (DMSO-d6): δ 7.41- 6.40 (m, 6H, arom, NH, H4-imidazole), 6.00(s, H4-DHP), 4.90(s, 2H, CH2N), 2.90-1.60 (m, 10H, CH2, CH2S), 1 ppm (m, 15H, CH2, CH3).
Anal. Calcd. for C29H34FN3O2S: C, 68.61; H, 6.75; N, 8.28. Found: C, 68.53; H, 6.84; N, 8.39.
3,3,6,6-Tetramethyl-9-(3-cyanophenyl)-2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10-octahydro-1,8-acridinedione [3c]
This compound was prepared from 2c similar to 3a, m.p 182.3°C, yield 96.5%; IR (KBr): 1628 cm-1 (C=O); 1H nmr (DMSO-d6): δ 7.70-6.80 (m, 4H, arom), 5.75 (s, H4-DHP), 2.60-1.50 (m, 8H, CH2), 1.20-0.30 ppm (m, 12H, CH3).
Anal. Calcd. C23H26N2O4: C, 70.03; H, 6.64; N, 7.10. Found: C, 70.13; H, 6.53; N, 7.08.
Pharmacology
Phenylephrine hydrochloride, Glibenclamide, nifedipine and Minoxidil were supplied by Sigma. Glibenclamide, nifedipine and compounds (3a-d) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Phenylephrine and KCl were dissolved in distilled water. DMSO in organ baths did not affect smooth muscle relaxations induced by compounds. All drug solutions were prepared daily.
In this study we used male Wistar rats (Razi Institutes, Mashhad, Iran), weighing 250-300 g. All animal procedures were approved by the ethical committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (80 mg/Kg) and their thoracic aorta was removed, cleaned of adhering fat and cut into rings of 3-4 mm long. All rings were mounted under 2 g resting tension on stainless steel hooks in 20 mL organ baths. These organ chambers were filled with Krebs-Henseleit solution (KHS), with a composition (in mM) of: NaCl 118, KCl 4.7, MgSO4 2 H2O 1.2 KH2PO4, 2 H2O 1.2, NaHCO3 25, CaCl2 2.5 and glucose 11.1., aerated with a mixture of 95% O2/5% CO2 and kept in 37°C. Tension was measured isometrically through a force transducer (Grass FTO3C) and recorded continuously using a transducer amplifier (Janssen Scientific Instruments) and a pen recorder. After mounting, the preparations were allowed to equilibrate for 1 h.
Aortic rings were pre-contracted with 1 μM phenylephrine or 80 mM KCl and concentration-response curve for compounds (3a-d). Nifedipine and Minoxidil were obtained through cumulative addition of these drugs to the bath solution. The relaxant effects of the compounds were expressed as the percentage of precontraction using phenylephrine or KCl. To evaluate the effects of the compounds, PD2 values were calculated.
In addition, these experiments were performed in the presence of Glibenclamide (ATP-sensitive potassium channel inhibitor) (3×10-6M) (
17).
Results were expressed as the mean ± SEM and were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.