9-Nitrocamptothecin (9-NC), 99.8% pure, was purchased from Yuanjian Pharmaceutical Technology Develop Co., (China). Poly (DL, lactide-co-glycolid) (PLGA, 50:50 MW 12000) was obtained from Boehringer Ingelheim Co. (Ingelheim, Germany) in the form of Resomer(R) 502H. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, MW 30000 Da, 87% hydrolyzed) was donated by Mowiol (Germany).
The Caco-2 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). Dulbecco,s modified eagle medium (DMEM), heated inactivity fetal bovin serum (FBS), non-essential aminoacids, L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, trypsin-EDTA (0.025%), penicillin-streptomycin solution, Hanksۥ balanced salt solution (HBSS) and N-2-hydroxyethyl piperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) were purchased from Gibco (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). 6-coumarine was purchased from (Fisher science, USA).
Acetone (Acet), pure potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Dichloromethane (DCM) and acetonitril were of HPLC or pharmaceutical grade (Merck, Germany).
Preparation of various diameter nanoparticles
Nanoparticles of diameters 110, 190, 310, 520 and 980 nm were formulated by the nanoprecipitation method and were characterized as discribed in our previous report (
27). Briefly, the 9-NC (1 mg) and PLGA polymer were dissolved in the organic phase. For smaller nanoparticles (110, 190 nm) acetone was used as solvent. The solvent of choice used for the particles of sizes 310, 520 and 980 nm was DCM. The amount of polymer utilized depended on the desired size of the particles (
Table 1). The organic phase was added drop wise 0.5 mL/min into a PVA aqueous solution (pH was adjusted to 3 by 0.1 N HCl) and stirred magnetically (700 rpm) at room temperature until complete evaporation of the organic solvent was achieved.
Subsequently, the prepared nanoparticles were accumulated by ultracentrifugation (Beckman, XL-90) at 45000 rpm and 4°C for 1 h. To obtain nanoparticles of 110 nm in diameter, the nanoparticle suspension (N1) was filtered through 0.2 μm syringe filters prior to ultracentrifugation.
| Loading (%) | PI | Size(nm) | Aqueous phase (mL) | Organic phase (mL) | PVA (%) | PLGA (mg) | Sample |
|---|
| 30.5 ± 2.87 | 0.22 | 110 ± 8.51 | 30 | Acet, 15 | 1 | 50 | N1 |
| 35.5 ± 4.15 | 0.28 | 190 ±12.67 | 20 | Acet, 12 | 1.10 | 165 | N2 |
| 42.5 ± 3.20 | 0.26 | 310 ± 13.35 | 40 | DCM, 20 | 1.50 | 50 | N3 |
| 40.5 ± 4.51 | 0.25 | 523 ± 10.67 | 40 | DCM, 20 | 1.50 | 100 | N4 |
| 47.6 ± 3.14 | 0.21 | 950 ± 14.53 | 25 | DCM, 10 | 1 | 100 | N5 |
The nanoparticles were washed three times in distilled water (pH 3) to allow for the complete removal of free drug and excess surfactants then freeze-dried. The acidic conditions of this procedure stabilized the active lactone form of the drug used.
The size distribution of the nanoparticles and their overall size was measured by laser light scattering (Brookhaven Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). The size distribution was achieved by using the polydispersity index. The lower the value is, the narrower the size distribution or the more uniform the nanoparticle sample is. The data reported in
Table 1 represents an average of five recorded measurements.
The morphology and surface characteristics of the nanoparticles were tested using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Phillips, Eindhoven, Netherlands.) (
27).
The drug content within the PLGA nanoparticles was determined as follows. 10 milligrams of freeze dried nanoparticles were dissolved in 1 mL DCM. The organic solvent was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The residue was then dissolved in 1 mL of mobile phase and the concentration of 9-NC was analyzed by the previously reported HPLC method (
28).
In-vitro drug release
The in-vitro drug release of the nanoparticles was determined after suspending 10 milligrams of the 9-NC nanoparticles in 50 ml of phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4, 37°C) then placing in a shaking water bath (200 rpm). At designated time intervals, 0.5 mL of sample was removed and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant (100 μL) was injected directly into the HPLC instrument and the amount of released drug was determined. The precipitated nanoparticles were then redispersed in fresh 0.5 mL release medium and placed back into the original release medium for continuous measurement.
Caco-2 cell culture
Caco-2 cells were grown as a monolayer in 150 cm2 plastic culture flasks in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acid solution, Na-Pyruvate and penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in an atmosphere consisting of 5% CO2 and 90% relative humidity. Cells were passed 1: 4, every 5 days (at 70-80% confluence) using trypsine-0.025% EDTA. To study the transport and uptake passages 30-35 were used to estimate the GI barrier for oral chemotherapy.
Transport study
For the transport studies, cells (80% confluent) were harvested with trypsine–0.025% EDTA and seeded at a density of 105 onto a polystyrene insert (1.131 cm2 growth area, Costar, Cambridge, MA) within the 12-well culture plates. The culture medium (0.5 mL in the apical side and 1.5 mL in basolateral side) was replaced 5 days following seeding and every 2 days thereafter.
The quality of the monolayers was assessed by measuring their transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) at 37°C using an EVOM epithelial Voltmeter with an Endohm electrode (World Precision Instruments, INC., Sarasota, FL.) Also the transport of Lucifer yellow across the cell layer was determined at the end of each experiment. Only monolayers displaying TEER values above 400 Ω were used in the experiments. The permeability of Lucifer yellow was determined to be < 1 % in all of the conducted experiments.
The transport study across the Caco-2 cell monolayers was carried out using a monolayer 21 days post seeding. Before the experiments, the monolayers were washed with HBSS containing 0.01 M HEPES (pH 7.4) and the TEER was measured. Then monolayers were then pre-incubated at 37°C for 30 min and the TEER was subsequently measured again. The HBSS on both sides of the monolayer was removed via aspiration. For the transport study of the nanoparticles and free drug, 0.5 ml HBSS (pH 7.4) containing nanoparticles and drug solution was added on the apical side and 1.5 mL of HBSS (pH 7.4) was added on the basolateral side of the monolayers. Then 200 μL aliquots were removed from the receiver side at desired time intervals (0.5-3 h). The concentration of drug in the samples was determined using the HPLC method (
28).
Caco-2 cell uptake study
Cells (80% confluent) were harvested with trypsine-0.025% EDTA solution and cultured in a 96-well black plate (Costar, Corning Incorporated) at a density of 5 x 105 cells/well. When the cells within the 96-well plate reached almost 90% confluence the medium was removed. The cells were then washed with 200 μL HBSS and equilibrated for 1 h in an incubator. Upon the removal of the HBSS, appropriate amounts consisting of 200 μL of the 9-NC nanoparticles or a control equivalent to the predesigned concentration were introduced into each well. For each nanoparticle preparation and the control (no particles or drug solution) a total of 8 wells (one column) were used.
After 3 hours of incubation the nanoparticle suspension was removed by plastic pipette, the sample columns were washed three times with cold Phosphate buffer solution and the cells were solubilized in 50 μL solution of 0.5% triton-X 100 for 30 min.
Following the addition of 200 μL of the mobile phase, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm and injected into the HPLC. In order to test the effect of incubation time and drug concentration on the nanoparticle uptake, cells were incubated with different concentrations of the drug for 3 h or the experiments were performed utilizing different incubation times.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Caco-2 cells were grown in Bioptech Delta T-dishes (Lab-Tek Chambered Coverglass system) and maintained with 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 80% confluence, the medium was removed and washed with HBSS. The cells were then incubated along with a suspension of 6-coumarine nanoparticles in the HBSS for 1-3 h.
In brief, for the preparation of coumarine-6 nanoparticles a solution of 0.25 mg coumarine in acetone (2 mL) was emulsified in 20 mL of an aqueous solution of 1% PVA using stirring at 700 rpm. Following the evaporation of the organic solvent, the nanoparticles were separated by an ultracentrifuge instrument at 40000 rpm and washed three times with distilled water. In order to remove the excess amount of coumarine, the nanoparticle suspension (10 mg in 50 mL water) was dialyzed through a dialysis membrane in 500 mL distilled water for 3 h.
At the end of the incubation periods, the cell monolayer was rinsed three times with cold PBS to remove excess nanoparticles and/or free dye. Subsequent to adding fresh HBSS buffer the cells were viewed and imaged under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 410, Goettingen, Germany) using a FITC filter (Ex (λ) 540 nm, Em (λ) 560 nm). The images were then processed with the aid of Carl Zeiss LSM software.
Statistical analysis
A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the uptake and transport parameters between the 9-NC nanoparticles and free drug groups. The level of significance was p < 0.05.