Plant material
Leaves of the Ficus carica were collected from Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard university) campus, New Delhi, India and authenticated by the taxonomist at the Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Hamdard University. A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of University for future reference.
Preparation of extract
Air dried and coarsely powdered leaves of the plant (1 kg) were soxhlet extracted with ethanol for 72 h. The ethanolic extract was then concentrated on a water bath and dried under reduced pressure to achieve a dark brown mass (95 g; yield- 9.5%).
Preliminary phytochemical screening
On preliminary phytochemical screening using the reported method (
12), the ethanolic extract of the
Ficus carica leaves showed positive tests for glycosides, steroids, triterpens and flavonoids.
Determination of phenolic compounds
The total phenols were estimated by the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent according with the method of Gao
et al. (
13). The total content was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents/g extract.
Determinaton of total flavonoids
The total flavonoid content was estimated according to Kosalec
et al. (
14). The total content was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents/g extract.
Animals
Hepatoprotective activity was carried out on Albino rats of either sex (110-145 g), supplied by the central animal house facility of Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi (Registration no. 173/CPCSEA). The rats were maintained in a 12 h light/dark cycle at 25 ± 2°C. They were allowed free access to a standard pellet diet (Amrut Laboratory Rat Feed, Navamaharashtra, Pune, India) and water ad libitum. The study was approved by the ethics committee CPCSEA and ethical norms were strictly followed during all experimental procedures.
Drugs and dosing schedule
The animals were divided into six groups; group I (control), group II (CCl4 treated), group III (CCl4 + silymarin treated), group IV, V and VI (CCl4 + extract). Animals of groups II, III, IV, V and VI were administered 50% (v/v) CCl4 in olive oil in a single dose of 2 mL/kg body weight per day for 4 days via the S.C. route. Simultaneously but at different hours of the day, animals of groups III, IV, V and VI were fed with silymarin suspension (10 mg/kg body weight, IP) in addition to ethanolic extract in doses of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg body weight, IP for 4 days respectively. Animals of group I were given distilled water in a volume of 10 mL/kg body weight.
Serum analysis
On the day 5, after the treatment period all of the subject animals were anaesthetized and sacrificed. Blood was withdrawn from the heart and their serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 30
oC for 15 min. This was subsequently analysed for various biochemical parameters including serum transaminases viz. SGOT (
15), SGPT (
15), total protein (
16), total albumin, alkaline phosphatase (
17) and total bilirubin content (
18).
In-vitro antioxidant activity by DPPH method
The stable 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl radical (DPPH) (75 μM) was used for the determination of free radical-scavenging activity of the extract (
19). 2.95 mg of DPPH was dissolved in 100 mL of methanol to achieve a 75 μM DPPH solution.
| Treatment | Dose(mg/Kg) | SGOT(U/mL) | SGPT(U/mL) | TB (g/dL) | ALKP(U/mL) | TP(g/dL) | TA(g/dL) |
|---|
| Control | - | 133.80 ± 0.15 | 74.47 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.002 | 35.93 ± 0.09 | 14.17 ± 0.02 | 4.81 ± 0.01 |
| CCl4 | 2 mL/Kg | 177.76 ± 0.17 | 112.38 ± 0.05 | 2.29 ± 0.02 | 73.74 ± 0.01 | 7.81 ± 0.05 | 4.10 ± 0.02 |
| Silymarin | 10 | 133.88 ± 0.02** | 85.30 ± 0.005** | 0.65 ± 0.002* | 37.18 ± 0.08** | 10.65 ± 0.06** | 4.73 ± 0.03* |
| Ficus carica | 50 | 158.65 ± 4.25 | 104.25 ± 0.03* | 1.17 ± 0.017 | 61.0 ± 0.028* | 6.07 ± 0.012* | 4.43 ± 0.01* |
| 100 | 151.00 ± 0.08* | 98.84±0.05* | 0.92 ± 0.002* | 47.02 ± 0.05* | 6.32 ± 0.06** | 4.60 ± 0.04* |
| 200 | 141.45 ± 0.05* | 90.71 ± 0.005** | 0.74 ± 0.019* | 35.12 ± 0.011* | 7.21 ± 0.08** | 4.65 ± 0.03* |
The ethanolic solution (0.5 mL) of plant extract in various concentrations was mixed in a test tube with 2.5 mL of methanol containing 75 μM DPPH giving a distinctive absorbance at 517 nm. The reaction mixture was set-aside in the dark at room temperature for 90 min and then its absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. Corresponding blank readings were also taken and the remaining DPPH was calculated. The experiment was repeated three times. Ascorbic acid and quercetin were used as standard controls.
In-vivo antioxidant activity
The in-vivo antioxidant activity of the ethanolic extract was carried out in CCl4 intoxicated rats. The liver samples collected were washed with chilled normal saline, weighed and 10% (w/v) liver homogenate was generated in ice cold 0.15 M KCl solution using a motor driven Teflon pestle. The suspension was centrifuged at 2000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min and the clear supernatant was used for the estimation of the following antioxidant markers.
Estimation of liver TBARS
The measurement of Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was carried out as an index of lipid peroxidation and measured in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) content by following the method outlined by Ohkawa
et al. (
20). The total protein content in the tissue homogenate was determined using the method set out by Lowry
et al. (
21). The values of TBARS were presented as nmol MDA /mg protein.
Estimation of reduced glutathione (GSH)
Glutathione was estimated using the Ellman reagent (5, 5-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid) according with Ellman’s method (
22) and the attained values were expressed as μmoL/g of liver tissue.
Statistical analysis
The results of biochemical parameters are reported as mean ± SEM. The statistical significance was determined by means of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s t-test (
23). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as being statistically significant.