Materials
Clopidogrel was received as a gift sample from Torrent Pharmaceutical Ltd. (Mehsana, India). Tween-80 and polyethylene glycol 400 were purchased from S.D. Fine Chemicals (Mumbai, India). Capmul MCM was kindly gifted by Abitec Corporation (USA). All the other chemicals and solvents were of analytical reagent grade and used without further purification.
Selection of the oil phase
Selection of the oil phase was based upon the maximum solubility of the drug. Different oils including Capmul MCM, Labrafac CC, cotton seed oil, sunflower oil and soybean oil were taken for solubility studies.
Selection of surfactant and co-surfactant
The criteria for the selection of surfactant were its HLB value and non-toxic nature. Several surfactants including tween-80, Captex-355, Cremophor EL and Labrafil were screened. Co-surfactants were selected based on their capability to form stable microemulsion with relevant surfactants at a minimum concentration. Based on this, several co-surfactants including polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400), glycerol, polyethylene glycol 600 (PEG 600) and Transcutol P were screened.
Pseudo-ternary phase diagram
Pseudo-ternary phase diagrams were constructed to obtain the appropriate components, and their concentration ranges that resulted in a large existence area of microemulsion were chosen. In order to optimize the concentration of oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, different batches of varied concentration were prepared and titrated with distilled water till transparency persisted. Ternary phase diagram was prepared by using a constant ratio of surfactant to co-surfactant. Four ratios of surfactant (tween 80) and co-surfactant (PEG 400) were selected (1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1).
Preparation of microemulsion
Predetermined amounts of the drug were dissolved in the required quantity of oil. Surfactant and co-surfactant were added to the above mixture as a fixed ratio. Distilled water was added gradually with continuous stirring, which resulted in the formulation of a transparent and homogenous microemulsion. Parameters optimized for the preparation of microemulsion were the type and concentration of the oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant.
Characterization of microemulsion
(I) Transmittance test
Stability of the microemulsion optimized formulation with respect to dilution was checked by measuring transmittance at 650 nm with a UV spectrophotometer (UV-1601-220X, Shimadzu).
(II) Globule size and zeta potential measurements
The globule size and zeta potential of the microemulsion was determined by dynamic light scattering, using a Zetasizer HSA 3000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).
(III) Viscosity measurements
Rheological behavior of the formulation was evaluated using a Brookfield LVDV ΙΙΙ+ cone and plate (CP) viscometer (Brookfield, USA), using the rheocal software, at a temperature of 30 ± 1°C.
(IV) Electrical conductivity
The water phase was added drop wise to a mixture of oil, surfactant and co-surfactant and the electrical conductivity of formulated samples was measured using a conductometer (CM 180 conductivity meter, Elico, India) at ambient temperature and at a constant frequency of 1 Hz.
(V) Drug stability
The optimized microemulsion was kept under cold condition (4-8 oC), room temperature and at elevated temperature (50 ± 2 oC). After every 2 months the microemulsion was analyzed for phase separation, % transmittance, globule size and % assay.
(VI) Drug solubility
Drug was added in excess to the optimized microemulsion formulation as well as each individual ingredient of the formulation. After continuous stirring for 24 h at room temperature, samples were withdrawn and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min. The amount of soluble drug in the optimized formulation as well as each individual ingredient of the formulation was calculated by subtracting the drug present in the sediment from the total amount of drug added. The solubility of drug in microemulsion was compared with respect to its individual ingredients.
Drug release studies
(I) In-vitro drug release
The diffusion studies were carried out, using a modified Franz diffusion cell. The receptor compartment was filled with 20 mL of pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. The donor compartment was fixed with cellophane membrane (cut off weight of 1000 Da), containing the microemulsion formulation (equivalent to 5 mg of clopidogrel) and the plain drug solution, separately. At predetermined time intervals samples were withdrawn from the receptor compartment and analyzed for drug content, using a UV spectrophotometer at 221.2 nm.
(II) Ex-vivo drug release
Ex-vivo drug release into phosphate buffer pH 7.4 was studied using intestinal membrane within a Franz diffusion cell. Microemulsion formulation (equivalent to 5 mg) and the plain drug solution were placed in the donor compartment of two separate diffusion cells and the temperature of each cell was maintained at 37 ± 2 °C. The amount of drug released from the microemulsion formulation was estimated spectrophotometrically at 221.2 nm, by withdrawing samples from the receptor compartment at predetermined time intervals.