Compound
1 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its HI-ESI-TOFMS exhibited a molecular ion peak at m/z 423.2738 [M + Na
+], agreed with the molecular formula C
22H
40O
6. The molecular formula accounted for three degrees of unsaturation. The
13C NMR spectrum (
Table 1), showed 22 carbon resonances which were analyzed from the DEPT-HSQC spectra to consist of six methyls, seven methylens, four methines and four quaternary carbons. Two carbon signals at δ
C 73.1 and 73.4 indicated the presence of oxygen bearing sp
3quaternary carbons. Another oxygenated carbons at δ
C 75.1 and 67.6 accounted for the carbons carrying two hydroxyl groups with the carbinolic methine protons coming at δ
H 3.55 (1H, dd,
J = 2.5, 8.5 Hz) and δ
H 4.39 (1H, brd,
J= 2.6 Hz), respectively. The signal at δ
C 66.2 accounted for amethylenic carbon attached to an acetoxy group, with the corresponding methylene protons coming at 3.96, 4.22 each as a doublet of doublet. According to the degree of unsaturation the molecule was bicyclic and appeared to be a labdane diterpenoid (
21). The
1H and
13C NMR spectrum displayed features similar to those of 14
α-hydroxy-15-acetoxysclareol
, isolated previously from this plant by us (
20). However, the
13C NMR spectrum of
1 showed the presence of an additional methine at
δC 67.6 instead of the methylene group (C-6). Hence, the methylene was replaced by an oxygenated methine. The signals of C-7 (
δC51.3) and C-5 (
δC56.7) were paramagnetically shifted (Δ
δ +7.3 and +0.7 ppm, respectively) in comparison to those of 14
α-hydroxy-15-acetoxysclareol. Also the resonances of neighboring H-7
α (
δH 1.55), H-7𝛽 (
δH 1.91), and H-5
α (
δH 0.83) were shifted (Δ
δ= +0.2, +0.15, and -0.03ppm, respectively). HMBC correlations between H-5
α, H-7
α with C-6, and between H-6, C-8, and C-10 (
Figure 1) confirmed the location of the hydroxyl group. Diagnostic COSY correlations were observed between H-6 and H-7
αand H-7
β, and between H-6 and H-5. The relative configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-6 was determined as
β based on the magnitude of the vicinal coupling constants of the H-6 resonance (
δH 4.39
, brd,
J = 2.6 Hz). NOESY contacts of H-6 with H-5 and H-7ax were observed. The
1H chemical shifts of CH
3-17, CH
3-19 and CH
3-20 (
δH 1.32, 1.10 and 1.08, respectively) appeared downfield (
δH 0.21, 0.38, and 0.35) relative to those of 14
α-hydroxy-15-acetoxysclareol. These differences were in agreement with an axial orientation of the hydroxyl group at C-6. Thus, the structure of
1 was established as 6
β,14
α-dihydroxy-15-acetoxysclareol.
Compound
2 was obtained as a white powder. The HR-ESI-TOFMS showed a peak at m/z 365.2712 [M+Na]
+, in agreement with the elemental formula C
20H
33O
4, which accounted for three degrees of unsaturation. The
1H and
13C NMR data (
Table 1) strongly resembled those of
1, indicating that the two compounds were structurally related. Inspection of the
1H and
13C NMR spectra showed the lack of the signals belonges to the acetoxy group in compound
2. Also, the methine signals at67.6 ppm (δ
H 4.39) was replaced by a methylene group (δ
C 20.6 and δ
H 1.57, 1.18) in
2. Thus, compound
2 was established as 14α, 15- dihydroxy sclareol.
Compounds
1 and
2 were evaluated for their
in vitro cytotoxic activity against Hela (human epitheloid cervix carcinoma) and MCF-7 (human breast adeno-carcinoma) cell lines. The results of the cytotoxicity studies were indicated in
Table 2.