Nowadays, much attention has been devoted to the remarkable role of the pharmaceutical industry in the world economy, which provides essential healthcare products and services. This industry is important due to its innovative and research-intensive nature, as it continuously strives to develop new and effective drugs to improve health outcomes (
1-
3). These developments have resulted in evolving the approach towards human resource management from a strategic to a sustainable approach as well. In this sustainable approach, human resource management strategies are designed and carried out in a way that optimally meets the current needs of the firm and society without jeopardizing their ability to respond to future needs (
4).
The recent years have witnessed remarkable growth in the implementation of sustainable human resource management (s-HRM) through the development of appropriate human resource policies and strategies (
5). S-HRM is an approach used for managing human resources that focuses on creating sustainable competitive advantages through the development of a highly skilled, motivated, and committed workforce by emerging as a critical factor in the success of companies (
6). S-HRM is particularly relevant in the pharmaceutical industry, where the success of R&D initiatives depends on the availability of highly skilled personnel with the necessary expertise and experience.
In the context of the present study, the focus has shifted towards the development of generic drugs, which are more affordable and accessible to the general public. This shift in focus has necessitated a change in the R&D process, moving operations in the development process such as proving bioequivalence to the original drugs instead of conducting full-scale clinical trials (
7).
According to social exchange theory, employees engage in OCB when they perceive that they have received something in return for their positive behaviors, such as recognition, support, and opportunities for development. In the context of s-HRM, the organization invests in the employees' well-being, development, and growth, which fosters a sense of reciprocity and obligation among employees to enhance behaviors that are beneficial to the organization beyond their job duties (
8).
Nevertheless, OCB includes voluntary behaviors of employees that are not part of the official duties and are not directly considered as employees' duties by the official reward system and increase the overall effectiveness of the organization. Hence, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is considered here as voluntary extra-role behavior by an employee, which, despite its voluntary nature, benefits the effective functioning of the firm (
9,
10). Organizations can benefit from using OCB to boost productivity, boost employee morale, encourage teamwork among coworkers, and generate a favorable work atmosphere, all of which can benefit both employees and companies (
11).
In the case of s-HRM, the organization's investments in the employees' well-being, development, and growth foster a sense of reciprocity and obligation among employees to demonstrate behaviors beneficial to the organization beyond their formal duties, i.e., OCB (
12). As the stability of the pharmaceutical industry depends on the research and development teams, it is essential to sustainably keep them, noting their work-life balance and health (
13).
However, there is still much to uncover about the process through which sustainable HRM practices bring about performance outcomes at the individual level, especially if we consider HRM’s part to be the productive use of employees to achieve the objectives of the firm as well as the incentivizing them to display extra-role behavior. Building on previous work by Shen and Benson (2014), the present study aims to investigate whether or not and in what way sustainable human resource management practices lead to the participation of employees in organizational citizenship behavior that benefits the organization (
14).
To the best of our knowledge, and despite the critical role of s-HRM, OI, and OCB in the success of pharmaceutical companies, there is limited research on the relationship between these factors. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the relationship between s-HRM, OI, and OCB, particularly in the context of pharmaceutical companies using “social exchange” and “organizational identification” theories. Based on the same theoretical framework, Wei et al. discussed that organizational identification (OI) has a positive relationship with employees' organizational citizenship behavior (
15). On the other hand, organizational identification theory posits that employees' identification with the organization is influenced by their perception of shared values, goals, and identity with the organization (
16). OI is generally referred to as the extent to which a person identifies with the same characteristics and values that characterize the organization to which they belong and is another critical factor that influences the success of companies (
17); when it comes to s-HRM, the organization's commitment to sustainable and responsible HR practices can reinforce employees' identification with the OI, leading to a greater sense of connection and commitment to the objectives and principles of the organization as it creates a sense of belonging as well as commitment among employees, which, in turn, enhances their performance and productivity.
As previous studies have mainly focused on the direct relationship between s-HRM and OCB, without considering the mediating role of other variables, the contribution of the current study is examining the way that other variables mediate this relationship. Furthermore, the previous research has mainly focused on linear relationships, which does not always accurately demonstrate the real world (
18). At the same time, the current work examines the non-linear or warped relationships that may exist between these variables. In addition, the lack of empirical research on the relationship between s-HRM and OCB is addressed in the context of developing countries is another contribution. Then, the findings provide important insights for pharmaceutical companies in Iran seeking to improve their R&D department's performance and competitiveness through effective HRM practices.
Overall, this study aims to advance our understanding of how s-HRM practices influence employee behavior, specifically OCB, by examining the mediating role of OI. The findings will offer valuable insights for both academia and pharmaceutical companies, guiding the development and implementation of effective HRM strategies to enhance employee performance, well-being, and organizational success.
1.1. Theory and Hypotheses Development
S-HRM practices are identified as human resource systems or practices that increase the organization's ability to maximize profits while reducing harm to employees (i.e., the social dimension of the triple bottom line) (
19,
20). Employee harm of work refers to the reduction of psychological, social, and occupational health and welfare for various stakeholders (such as employees, their family members, and communities) (
21).
1.2. Sustainable Human Resource Management and Organizational Identification
Based on previous research, s-HRM practices have been found to promote employee well-being and job satisfaction, which in turn lead to higher levels of OI. Therefore, it is expected that employees who perceive their organization as adopting s-HRM practices will have a stronger sense of identification with their organization (
22,
23). As previously mentioned, both the theories of social identity and social exchange can provide insights into the explanation of how s-HRM relates to employees' OCB. OI has been used in social exchange and social identity-based studies to explain how HRM practices may induce a higher sense of OI (
14,
24).
Social identity theory suggests that people's identification with the organization is stronger when the organization has a good reputation in their eyes because membership in that organization increases their self-esteem (
25).
In other words, by implementing s-HRM, the organization can benefit its internal stakeholders and create a positive external reputation for itself. This positive reputation makes individuals proud to be employed in their organization and strengthens their OI (
26).
Social exchange theory (
27) has also been used to explain why HRM practices may prompt employees to develop stronger OI and, in turn, take the form of positive organizational behaviors. Building on the mentioned theories, we suggest that using s-HRM practices by organizations that pay attention to employees' needs and resolve their concerns leads employees to reciprocate in the format of OI. As an illustration, individuals working for an organization that follows employment, health, and safety regulations and promotes equal opportunity for them are more likely to commence psychologically investing in the organization and develop a higher level of OI. Therefore, we propose:
Hypothesis 1: Sustainable human resource management has a direct relationship with organizational identification.
1.3. Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Based on social identity theory, individuals who identify with their organization are more likely to display behaviors such as OCB. Therefore, it is expected that employees who have a strong sense of identification with their organization will engage in more organizational citizenship behavior.
OI includes two basic motivations: (A) the need for self-categorization (the degree to which the employee considers himself to belong to the organization) and (B) the need for self-enhancement (a sense of pride in belonging to the organization or a sense of approval in it). In terms of its relationship with OCB, OI has a long history of influencing organizational citizenship behavior (
10). In particular, an employee who has a stronger identity connection with their organization may have a stronger motivation to think about and address workplace problems from the perspective of group interests. Such employees define themselves based on a collective identity orientation and prefer to be "good citizens" (
28).
A good organizational citizen is an individual who exhibits individual, voluntary, and conscious behaviors that are not directly and openly identified by organizational reward systems and organizational performance evaluation systems but have a very impressive effect on organizational effectiveness overall (
29).
For a long time, researchers have distinguished between in-role performance and extra-role performance through OCB. Extra-role performance refers to job behaviors beyond the official roles of employees, which are optional and are usually not considered a reward or payment in the organization's official reward system (
30).
Since OI includes the basic definition of existence (individual and organizational identities), it has a unique value in explaining individual attitudes and behaviors in organizations. Due to the complexity of work in workplaces, it is often necessary for employees to go beyond the description of their official job duties and collaborate with their colleagues. A number of empirical studies have shown that employees who communicate with the organization's identity not only tend to go beyond their job duties but also tend to make more effort to promote the organization's collective interests and values (
31-
33). Finally, we hypothesize:
Hypothesis 2: Organizational identification has a direct relationship with organizational citizenship behavior.
1.4. The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification
Based on social identity theory, employees who identify strongly with their organization are more likely to engage in behaviors that benefit the organization (
8). Therefore, it is expected that sustainable human resource management practices will lead to higher levels of OI, which in turn will lead to higher levels of organizational citizenship behavior.
As the organization's use of sustainable human resource management practices that benefit external stakeholders leads employees to identify more strongly with their organization, they begin to consider the organization's values and interests as their own and integrate them into their self-concept (
17), which leads them to participate in extra-role activities, including organizational citizenship behavior, which in turn plays a pivotal role in the organization's goal attainment. These behaviors have a positive impact on the organization's image and provide employees with an opportunity to enhance their self-concept. Furthermore, as proposed by social exchange theory, mutual obligations emerge from the reciprocal interactions between two parties engaged in a relationship. Organizations initiate this social exchange by offering favorable treatment to employees along with economic or socio-emotional resources. Subsequently, employees experience a sense of obligation to respond in kind to the positive treatment they have received. This reciprocity takes the form of behaviors that directly contribute to the organization's well-being, such as engaging in OCB. In addition, social exchange theory suggests that obligations arise as a result of mutual social exchange between two parties in a relationship, and social exchange is initiated by organizations when they positively treat their employees and provide them with economic or socio-emotional resources. In turn, employees feel obligated to reciprocate the positive behavior bestowed upon them with behavior that directly benefits the organization, such as OCB (
24).
2 Hence, organizations embrace s-HRM practices that directly contribute to employee welfare. These practices foster social exchange processes, which in turn prompt employees to cultivate heightened levels of organizational identity. Consequently, employees exhibit a psychological commitment to the organization as a response to this identity. (
34). In the present study, we expect that higher levels of OI and the willingness of the organization to participate in a reciprocal social exchange process with its employees will lead to a reciprocation on their part by demonstrating organizational citizenship behavior.
Hypothesis 3: Organizational identification mediated the relationship between sustainable human resource management and organizational citizenship behavior.
The conceptual model and all three hypotheses are displayed in
Figure 1.