This phantom study comparing T
2WI, T
2*WI, and SWI demonstrated that SWI is the most sensitive in SPIO-hMSC detection. T
2WI did not detect SPIO-hMSCs in the cell concentration range used in this study. SWI detected a lump of fewer cells of 13 SPIO-hMSCs/µL compared with T
2*WI, which detected a lump of 27 SPIO-hMSCs/µL (
Figure 2). It is difficult to compare the sensitivity obtained in this study with that in other studies because of differences in magnet strength (e.g. 4.7 T vs. 9.4 T) among individual MRI machines, in pulse sequences used for imaging (e.g. spin echo vs. gradient echo; differences in resolution), and in types of cell preparations (e.g. prepared cell number and volume). In a study using 17.6-T MRI with the gradient echo technique, the fewest cells were detected (2 µL of 50/µL, 100 cells) (
16). In another phantom study using 9.4-T and 4.7-T MRI with the same phantom and imaging parameters, 9.4-T MRI (gradient echo) was superior in detecting the SPIO-labeled neural stem cells in a concentration of 1 × 10
2 cells (volume unknown) compared with 4.7-T MRI (gradient echo), which detected cells in a concentration of 5 × 10
2 cells (volume unknown) (
17). They used 2% gelatin blocks containing SPIO-labeled neural stem cells for the phantom, similar to that used in the present study. The minimal number of cells detected was also similar to that in the present study, in which 15 µL of 27 SPIO-hMSCs/µL (400 cells) were detected on 3.0-T T
2*WI. Meanwhile, no information is available regarding the minimum cell concentration that can be detected using SWI. In the present study, 3.0-T SWI detected 15 µL of 13 SPIO-hMSCs/µL (200 cells). SWI was used only in one of the several studies performed using MRI for molecular imaging. Cheng et al. first used the SWI pulse sequence for SPIO-hMSCs (
12). However, they did not mention the minimal cell number that can be detected using SWI. The size of the dark region derived from SPIO-hMSCs was larger on SWI than on T
2*WI in the phantom and in the direct and ICA infusion studies of the rat brain (Figures
2-
4). The size of the dark regions was increased on SWI. Some reports have mentioned the increase in volume on SWI compared with that in the real sample. In the study by Mittal et al. and Babikian et al. SWI was 3-6 times more sensitive than conventional T
2*WI in detecting the size, number, volume, and distribution of hemorrhagic lesions after cerebral injury (
10,
18). It may be easy to detect SPIO-hMSCs on SWI because of the increased intensity of dark regions.
At 24 h after ICA infusion in six rats with photothrombotic cerebral infarction, engrafted SPIO-hMSCs were detected around the cerebral infarction (6/6, 100%) on MRI (
Figure 4). ICA infusion is very effective in delivering stem cells to the lesion, particularly in the early phase after infusion (
15,
19,
20). T
2WI did not detect SPIO-hMSCs observed as dark regions in other sequences. The surrounding dark regions were more prominent on SWI than on T
2*WI. Meanwhile, SPIO-hMSCs were also detected and distributed in the whole ipsilateral normal parenchyma (2/6, 33%) (
Figure 4) (
15,
21) probably because of plugging of end arteries in the cerebrum that led to infarction (
Figure 3C and 4C). The dark regions caused by plugging of end arteries were also more distinct on SWI than on T
2*WI. However, plugging of the end artery is suspected to be developed only in a small animal study because of the relatively small cerebral artery caliber. In humans, plugging of end arteries cannot be suspected because of the large cerebral artery caliber and some other techniques that prevent dispersed cell aggregation. The cells infused into one side of the brain are distributed to the contralateral side (
Figure 3C) probably because of a patent circle of Willis. This phenomenon is also not critical to humans because small-caliber arteries distal to the circle of Willis can be superselected.
SWI has drawbacks, such as artifacts, which are not frequent with other MRI pulse sequences (Figures
2-
4). SWI can detect non-uniformity of local magnetic fields caused by paramagnetic and diamagnetic tissues (
11,
22,
23). Paramagnetic materials always demonstrate low signal intensity on magnitude and phase images, while diamagnetic materials demonstrate high signal intensity on phase images and low signal intensity on magnitude images (
24). Therefore, when interpreting SWI findings, paramagnetic materials that can result in dark signal artifacts, such as deoxygenated venous blood, hemorrhage, iron, and air, should be ruled out (
10,
11).
This study has limitations. First, because of the indirect detection of cells through the SPIO effect on proton relaxation, it was difficult to absolutely quantify the cell concentration (
25). Second, it was difficult to discriminate SPIO-labeled cells in areas of hemorrhage and traumatic injury because of proton dephasing effects of methemoglobin, ferritin, and hemosiderin, particularly at higher fields. There is a possibility of occasional misinterpretation of isolated dark regions because of differences in magnetic susceptibility around blood vessels and air-tissue interfaces (i.e., stomach and gastrointestinal tract). Third, in the in vivo study, there was no exact correlation between MRI and the actual cell number. Researchers only know the number of infused cells and not the number of imaged cells. Fourth, the number of rats included in this study was too small. Therefore, a further study with more rats is warranted. For practical applications, the labeling of cells with SPIO nanoparticles and MRI are expected to effectively track the cells in the human (
26). Because the resolution of MR images is much lower in humans than in small animals, the most sensitive pulse sequence is undoubtedly needed. Based on this animal study, it will make human trial successful with SWI pulse sequence.
In conclusion, SWI is the most sensitive in the detection of SPIO-hMSCs compared with T2*WI and T2WI, with the dark regions representing SPIO-hMSCs being more prominent on SWI than on the other two pulse sequences.