Int Cardiovasc Res J

Image Credit:Int Cardiovasc Res J

Decoding Cardiovascular Links to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission and Mortality in COVID-19

Author(s):
Owrang EilamiOwrang EilamiOwrang Eilami ORCID1, 2, Alireza MoarefAlireza Moaref3,*, Sasan HosseiniSasan Hosseini4, Mohsen KhabirMohsen Khabir5
1HIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Department of Family Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4Cardiology Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5University of Michigan, Michigan, USA

International Cardiovascular Research Journal:Vol. 19, issue 1; e164709
Published online:Oct 27, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 22, 2025
Accepted:Oct 19, 2025
How to Cite:Eilami O, Moaref A, Hosseini S, Khabir M. Decoding Cardiovascular Links to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission and Mortality in COVID-19.Int Cardiovasc Res J.2025;19(1):e164709.https://doi.org/10.5812/icrj-164709.

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the cardiovascular links to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Methods:

A retrospective study of 216 COVID-19 patients admitted to Shahid Faghihi Hospital was conducted. The study examined their lab results, heart tests, and cardiovascular complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS (v.26) software with t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models.

Results:

Out of 216 patients, 41.2% were male and 58.8% were female, with a mean age of 61.56 years. Of these, 23.1% required ICU admission, and 14.81% of the total died. Patients needing ICU care had higher age, LDH, and D-dimer levels, while deceased patients showed elevated LDH, D-dimer, troponin, and various ECG abnormalities. A normal ECG had a protective effect against ICU admission.

Conclusions:

COVID-19 patients can develop cardiovascular complications such as myocarditis, stroke, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), which increase morbidity and mortality. Therefore, careful cardiovascular monitoring is crucial.

1. Background

Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 are highly significant. Patients with pre-existing heart conditions such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes tend to have worse outcomes with COVID-19 (1).

The presence of two cardiac comorbidities increased the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, or mortality by 2.59 times (2). Earlier studies had ascertained that cardiovascular disease (CVD) as an underlying comorbidity might enhance the risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients (3, 4). Acute myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients raises morbidity and mortality, leading to more complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), arrhythmias, coagulopathy, kidney injury, and acute coronary syndromes caused by heightened coagulation and inflammation (5). Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and COVID-19 had a 21% higher death risk, showing a bidirectional link between the conditions (6). COVID-19 increases thrombotic complications due to interactions with platelets, microvascular injury, cytokine release, and endothelial dysfunction (7). COVID-19 patients showed a 17% incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which was more common in hospitalized than non-hospitalized patients (8). The prevalence of DVT was around 12.1%, and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) was approximately 7.1% in these patients (9). In addition, COVID-19 patients experienced catheter-related thrombosis, filter thrombosis during renal therapy, and portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis (10).

Based on past research, the relationship between COVID-19 and CVD remains unclear and appears to be a bidirectional relationship. Pre-existing CVD is common in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. In addition, COVID-19 has been associated with cardiovascular complications, such as myocardial infarction or injury, myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, and stroke, even in patients without a history of CVD. However, more studies are needed to address this paradox (11, 12).

2. Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the cardiovascular links to ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

3. Methods

In a retrospective and applied study, 216 COVID-19 patients selected from Shahid Faghihi Hospital were examined. Patients were enrolled in this cohort based on a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and an age range of 18 to 75 years. This study aimed to determine factors that affect the likelihood of these patients being transferred to intensive care, dying, or being discharged from the hospital. Clinical data of the patients were collected from the hospital information system to determine the relationship between demographic factors, cardiovascular outcomes, and clinical indicators with determining intensive care status, death, and discharge using statistical methods. In this analysis, the role of factors such as age, gender, and cardiovascular indicators, including cardiac evaluation results and the presence or absence of positive troponin, was examined alongside ECG findings to provide quantitative predictions of disease severity and risk of cardiovascular complications.

Inclusion criteria included patients with a positive PCR test. Patients whose test results were not known and those not in the adult age range were excluded from the study. Clinical data were based on the hospital information system, and a cardiologist reviewed the clinical data to remove erroneous data. The study protocol was developed by consensus of experts and used the steps of managing missing data through multiple imputation to ensure the validity and neutrality of the data.

The collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26. Qualitative variables were reported as numerical-relative (number and percentage), and quantitative variables were reported as descriptive with mean and standard deviation to provide a clear picture of the sample distribution. Patients were grouped according to three main criteria: Hospitalization department and clinical outcomes.

The statistical tests used in this study included chi-square for binary qualitative data, t-tests for comparing the means of two groups, and the Mann-Whitney test for nonparametric comparisons between groups. For cardiovascular outcome analysis, a logistic regression model with the enter method was used to predict the association between clinical indicators and cardiovascular events while controlling for confounding factors such as age and underlying diseases to improve model validity and inferential power. This approach allows for the simultaneous influence of multiple factors on clinical outcomes and reduces bias due to overlapping variables.

4. Results

This study involved 216 patients, with 41.2% being male. Outcomes included 14.8% deaths and 23.1% ICU admissions. The mean ± SD age was 61.6 13.9 years.

4.1. Intensive Care Unit Admission

Among 166 ward patients, 39.8% were male, while of the 50 ICU patients, 46.0% were male. There was no significant gender difference in ICU admission (P = 0.432). The mean age of ICU patients was 65.94 years, while the mean age of ward patients was 60.25 years (Table 1).

Table 1.Comparison of the Need for Hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit According to Demographic Characteristics
VariablesRegular Ward (N = 166)ICU Admission (N = 50)P-Value
Gender0.432
Man66 (39.8)23 (46.0)
Woman100 (60.2)27 (54.0)
Age60.25 ± 13.98565.94 ± 12.6430.011

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

a Values are expressed as mean ± SD or No. (%).

This study compared ECG findings between ICU and ward patients. Only 6% of ICU patients had a normal ECG, compared to 54.8% in the wards (P < 0.001). Common ICU abnormalities included sinus tachycardia, left bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, and rightward axis deviation, all with significant P-values (Table 2).

Table 2.Effect of ECG Type on Intensive Care Unit Admission a
ECG FindingsRegular Ward (N = 166)ICU Admission (N = 50)P-Value
Normal< 0.001
No75 (45.2)47 (94.0)
Yes91 (54.8)3 (6.0)
Sinus tachycardia< 0.001
No143 (86.1)32 (64.0)
Yes23 (13.9)18 (36.0)
Nonspecific ST-T changes0.175
No140 (84.3)38 (76.0)
Yes26 (15.7)12 (24.0)
Sinus bradycardia0.073
No154 (92.8)50 (100)
Yes12 (7.2)0 (0.0)
Left bundle branch block0.006
No163 (98.2)44 (88.0)
Yes3 (1.8)6 (12.0)
Ischemic pattern0.391
No161 (97.0)47 (94.0)
Yes5 (3.0)3 (6.0)
Atrial fibrillation0.001
No166 (100)45 (90.0)
Yes0 (0.0)5 (10.0)
Right bundle branch block0.012
No166 (100)47 (94.0)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (6.0)
Right axis deviation0.012
No166 (100)47 (94.0)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (6.0)
Diffuse ST elevation0.053
No166 (100)48 (96.0)
Yes0 (0.0)2 (4.0)

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

The study found that pericardial effusion was more common in ICU patients (18%) compared to ward patients (3%, P < 0.001). Similarly, pleural effusion was more prevalent in ICU patients (30%) versus ward patients (9.6%, P < 0.001). Bilateral pleural effusion was significantly higher in ICU patients (24%) than in ward patients (4.8%, P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in unilateral effusion (P = 0.719, Table 3).

Table 3.Comparison of the Need for Hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit According to the Accumulation of Fluid in the Third Space a
Fluid AccumulationsRegular Ward (N = 166)ICU Admission (N = 50)P-Value
Pericardial effusion0.001
No161 (97.0)41 (82.0)
Yes5 (3.0)9 (18.0)
Pleural effusion overall< 0.001
No150 (90.4)35 (70.0)
Yes16 (9.6)15 (30.0)
Unilateral pleural effusion0.719
No158 (95.2)47 (94.0)
Yes8 (4.8)3 (6.0)
Bilateral pleural effusion< 0.001
No158 (95.2)38 (76.0)
Yes8 (4.8)12 (24.0)

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

This study examined vascular complications in COVID-19 patients related to ICU hospitalization. Stroke occurred in 3% of ward patients and none in ICU patients (P = 0.592), showing no significant difference. The DVT was absent in ward patients but present in 6% of ICU patients (P = 0.012). The PTE affected 10.2% of ward patients and 18% of ICU patients (P = 0.139), which was not significantly different. However, massive pulmonary embolism was more common in ICU patients (6% vs. 0%; P = 0.012, Table 4).

Table 4.Comparison of Final Results Based on Vascular Complication a
Vascular ComplicationsRegular Wards (N = 166)ICU Admission (N = 50)P-Value
Stroke0.592
No161 (97.0)50 (100)
Yes5 (3.0)0 (0.0)
DVT0.012
No166 (100)47 (94.0)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (6.0)
PTE0.139
No149 (89.8)41 (82.0)
Yes17 (10.2)9 (18.0)
Pulmonary sub-segmental thromboembolism0.216
No155 (93.4)44 (88.0)
Yes11 (6.6)6 (12.0)
Pulmonary segmental thromboembolism0.34
No160 (96.4)50 (100)
Yes6 (3.6)0 (0.0)
Massive PTE0.012
No166 (100)47 (94.0)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (6.0)

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PTE, pulmonary thromboembolism.

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

The study's regression analysis showed that older age, positive troponin, sinus tachycardia, left bundle branch block, pericardial effusion, and pleural effusions significantly increased the likelihood of ICU admission, with troponin and age having the strongest associations (Table 5).

Table 5.Examining the Predictability of the Need for Intensive Care Unit Admission Based on the Study's Regression Analysis
VariablesORP-Value
Age1.0320.012
Troponin4.655< 0.001
D-dimer1.000< 0.001
Normal ECG0.053< 0.001
Sinus tachycardia3.497< 0.001
Left bundle branch block7.4090.006
Pericardial effusion7.0680.001
Overall pleural effusion2.435< 0.001
Bilateral pleural effusion6.237< 0.001

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

4.2. Mortality

In this study, among 184 recovered patients, 40.8% were male, while among the 32 deceased patients, 43.8% were male. There was no significant association between gender and mortality (P = 0.751). The results revealed that deceased patients were significantly older (P < 0.001, Table 6).

Table 6.Comparison of the Final Outcomes According to Demographic Characteristics and Lab Data a
VariablesOutcomesP-Value
Recovery (N = 184)Death (N = 32)
Gender0.751
Man75 (40.8)14 (43.8)
Woman109 (59.2)18 (56.3)
Age60.08 ± 13.8170.13 ± 10.86< 0.001
Troponin< 0.001
Negative76 (56.7)3 (9.4)
Borderline46 (34.3)7 (53.1)
Positive12 (9.0)12(37.5)
D-dimer1559.8 ± 1886.14404.8 ± 4171.8< 0.001

a Values are expressed as mean ± SD or No. (%).

Troponin levels were categorized as negative, borderline, or positive in 166 patients, with 47.5%, 38.0%, and 14.5%, respectively. D-dimer was measured in 209 patients, averaging around 2580, with deceased patients showing significantly higher levels (P < 0.001, Table 6).

This study found no normal ECGs in the 32 deceased patients, while 51.1% of the 184 recovered patients had normal ECGs (P < 0.001). Deceased patients more frequently showed non-specific ST-T changes, atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, rightward axis deviation, and diffuse ST elevation, all with significant P-values (Table 7).

Table 7.Comparison of Final Results Based on Electrocardiographic Features Found in the ECG and Echocardiographic a
FindingsRecovery (N = 184)Death (N = 32)P-Value
ECG
Normal< 0.001
No90 (48.9)32 (100)
Yes94 (51.1)0 (0.0)
Sinus tachycardia0.971
No149 (81.0)26 (81.3)
Yes35 (19.0)6 (18.8)
Nonspecific ST-T changes0.001
No158 (85.9)20 (62.5)
Yes26 (14.1)12 (37.5)
Sinus bradycardia0.221
No172 (93.5)32 (100)
Yes12 (6.5)0 (0.0)
Left bundle branch block0.133
No178 (96.7)29 (90.6)
Yes6 (3.3)3 (9.4)
Ischemic pattern0.098
No179 (97.3)29 (90.6)
Yes5 (2.7)3 (9.4)
Atrial fibrillation< 0.001
No184 (100)27 (84.4)
Yes0 (0.0)5 (15.6)
Right bundle branch block0.003
No184 (100)29 (90.6)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (9.4)
Right axis deviation0.003
No184 (100)29 (90.6)
Yes0 (0.0)3 (9.4)
Diffuse ST elevation0.021
No184 (100)30 (93.8)
Yes0 (0.0)2 (6.3)
Echocardiographic
Normal0.183
No17 (50.0)9 (75.0)
Yes17 (50.0)3 (25.0)
LVD0.091
No20 (58.8)3 (25.0)
Yes14 (41.2)9 (75.0)
RVD0.005
No31 (91.2)6 (50.0)
Yes3 (8.8)6 (50.0)

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

The study examined echocardiographic findings and outcomes. Half of the recovered patients had normal echocardiograms, compared to 25% of deceased patients (P = 0.183), which was not statistically significant. Reduced left ventricular function was seen in 41.2% of recovered and 75% of deceased patients (P = 0.091), also not significant. However, deceased patients were significantly more likely to have reduced right ventricular function (50% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.005, Table 7).

Deceased patients were more likely to have pericardial effusion (18.8% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.008) and pleural effusion (37.5% vs. 10.3%, P < 0.001). Regarding unilateral effusion, there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.375). However, bilateral pleural effusion was significantly higher in deceased patients (37.5% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.001, Table 8).

Table 8.Comparison of Final Results Based on Third Space Accumulation a
Fluid AccumulationsRecovery (N = 184)Death (N = 32)P-Value
Pericardial effusion0.002
No176 (95.7)26 (81.3)
Yes8 (4.3)6 (18.8)
Pleural effusion overall< 0.001
No165 (89.7)20 (62.5)
Yes19 (10.3)12 (37.5)
Unilateral pleural effusion0.375
No173 (94.0)32 (100)
Yes11 (6.0)0 (0.0)
Bilateral pleural effusion< 0.001
No176 (95.7)20 (62.5)
Yes8 (4.3)12 (37.5)

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

This study found no significant differences between recovered and deceased COVID-19 patients in the occurrence of stroke, DVT, or PTE overall, with P-values > 0.99 and 0.206. However, sub-segmental pulmonary embolism was significantly more common in deceased patients (18.8%) compared to recovered patients (6.0%, P = 0.013, Table 9).

Table 9.Comparison of Final Results Based on Vascular Complications a
Vascular ComplicationsRecovery (N = 184)Death (N = 32)P-Value
Stroke> 0.999
No179 (97.3)32 (100)
Yes5 (2.7)0 (0.0)
DVT> 0.999
No181 (98.4)32 (100)
Yes3 (1.6)0 (0.0)
PTE0.206
No164 (89.1)26 (81.3)
Yes20 (10.9)6 (18.8)
Pulmonary sub-segmental thromboembolism0.013
No173 (94.0)26 (81.3)
Yes11 (6.0)6 (18.8)
Pulmonary segmental thromboembolism0.595
No178 (96.7)32 (100)
Yes6 (3.3)0 (0.0)
Massive PTE0.467
No181 (98.4)32 (100)
Yes3 (1.6)0 (0.0)

Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PTE, pulmonary thromboembolism.

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

5. Discussion

This study examined 216 COVID-19 patients, focusing on cardiovascular complications and comparing outcomes based on demographics, cardiovascular assessments, and vascular issues. Findings showed that ICU patients and those who died were older than recovered patients. Each additional year of age increased the odds of ICU hospitalization by 1.032 times and mortality by 1.062 times. These results are consistent with other research, such as Bonanad et al.'s meta-analysis, which also found higher mortality rates in older COVID-19 patients (13). Previous studies indicate that males had higher COVID-19 mortality rates than females, but the difference was not statistically significant (14). The study found mortality rates of 15.7% in males and 14.2% in females. Cohen et al. reported higher hospitalization rates for ages 30 - 69, while ICU admissions for those over 70 were lower than in younger groups (15). This difference in hospitalization rates may stem from an age-based approach to admission, especially when ICU beds were limited during COVID-19 in many areas (16).

In the study, 14.5% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients tested positive for troponin. This rate was higher among ICU and deceased patients compared to those in regular wards or who recovered. Al Abbasi et al. in Florida found 27.6% of hospitalized patients had positive troponin and were more likely to die (17). Similarly, in a study by Garcia de Guadiana-Romualdo et al., more than 12% of patients had positive troponin (18). The lower troponin threshold in this study may be due to a "borderline" troponin parameter in lab tests. However, troponin positivity in COVID-19 is likely linked to myocardial injury caused by respiratory issues and myocarditis-related hypoxia (19). In the studied group, only 56.5% had normal ECGs, with sinus tachycardia being the most common at 19%. This increased heart rate may result from physiological responses to infection and fever. Kaliyaperumal et al.’s study of over 300 COVID-19 patients in India found 2.9% had rhythm disorders like atrial fibrillation, and 16.9% showed ST-segment abnormalities. Cardiac rate issues were present in 36.5%, making it the most frequent ECG abnormality in that group (20). The significant rhythm disorders observed align with Indian research. In this study, sinus tachycardia, bundle branch blocks, atrial fibrillation, and right axis deviation were common during ICU hospitalization.

Echocardiography, performed only in patients with suspected heart failure, showed a 50% prevalence of reduced left ventricular function and 4.2% for right ventricular dysfunction, higher in ICU and deceased patients. Mele et al.’s study of 96 COVID-19 patients found subclinical left ventricular reduction in 90%, highlighting COVID-19’s severe impact on the heart (21). Pericardial effusion was seen in 6.5% of patients, and pleural effusion in 14.4%, both linked to higher ICU stays and mortality. The effect of pleural effusion was mainly noted with bilateral involvement, indicating more severe illness. Ghantous et al. found pericardial effusion in 14% of COVID-19 patients who all underwent echocardiography, with some showing no symptoms (22). The higher prevalence of pericardial effusion in Ghantous’ study likely results from all patients, including those without clinical signs, undergoing echocardiography. Vascular complications were also assessed, with cerebral infarction occurring in 2.3% of patients, DVT in 1.4%, and PTE in 14% of patients. Sub-segmental pulmonary embolisms were associated with higher mortality, possibly due to the initial undetected severity. Nannoni et al.’s 2021 meta-analysis estimated ischemic stroke prevalence at around 1.22%, similar to this study, with over 30% of stroke patients dying — much higher than mortality from COVID-19 alone (23). In this study, the stroke rate among critically ill patients was not significantly elevated, likely due to the inability to transfer some severely ill patients for CT scans. Additionally, Jig Ng’s 2021 meta-analysis reported that approximately 11.1% of COVID-19 patients on prophylactic anticoagulation experienced PTE (24). This is roughly consistent with the 14% observed in the present study. In our study, all patients received prophylactic anticoagulation since admission.

Demographics, clinical data, and cardiovascular assessments, including ECG and the measurement of relevant biomarkers such as troponin, were included in our study. This study proposes an innovative approach that estimates the risk of ICU admission and death in the short term and provides explanatory explanations to translate key factors such as age, troponin positivity, and ECG changes into understandable and actionable clinical language. This will lead to improved clinical decision-making, optimization of ICU bed allocation in resource-constrained settings, and increased acceptance and trust of the model results by the healthcare team.

5.1. Conclusions

This comprehensive study of 216 COVID-19 patients highlights key cardiovascular complications linked to adverse outcomes, such as ICU admission and mortality. It confirms that advanced age and positive troponin levels are strong predictors of severity and death, aligning with existing research. The study also identified prevalent electrocardiographic abnormalities like sinus tachycardia and rhythm disturbances, along with significant reductions in ventricular function, especially in severe cases. Fluid buildup, such as pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions, was associated with a worse prognosis, while vascular issues like PTE, particularly sub-segmental types, significantly increased mortality risks. Overall, these findings emphasize the importance of personalized cardiovascular monitoring in COVID-19 management to improve risk assessment and clinical outcomes.

5.2. Limitations

This study provides valuable insights into COVID-19's cardiovascular impacts but has several limitations. Its retrospective, single-center design restricts causal inferences and may involve incomplete data, especially for subclinical conditions. The findings may not be generalizable due to selection bias, as only hospitalized patients were included, excluding milder cases, and recent data sharing restrictions limit transparency. Unmeasured confounders, like socioeconomic factors and treatment variations, could influence results. Diagnostic tools used may have varying accuracy, and the study's design prevents establishing a direct temporal link between COVID-19 and cardiovascular outcomes. Additionally, evolving clinical practices mean the findings may not reflect current care standards, highlighting the need for prospective, multicenter studies with broader data collection to validate and expand these observations.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052-9.
  • 2.
    Guan WJ, Liang WH, He JX, Zhong NS. Cardiovascular comorbidity and its impact on patients with COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(6). [PubMed ID: 32341104]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7236831]. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01227-2020.
  • 3.
    Einstein AJ, Shaw LJ, Hirschfeld C, Williams MC, Villines TC, Better N, et al. International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(2):173-85. [PubMed ID: 33446311]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7836433]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.054.
  • 4.
    Zibaeenezhad MJ, Sayadi M, Drissi HB, Daneshvar Z, Parsa N, Farshadi N, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in fatal cases of COVID-19 in Fars province, Iran. Int Cardiovascular Res J. 2021;15(1).
  • 5.
    Sandoval Y, Januzzi JJ, Jaffe AS. Cardiac Troponin for Assessment of Myocardial Injury in COVID-19: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(10):1244-58. [PubMed ID: 32652195]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7833921]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.068.
  • 6.
    Xiang D, Xiang X, Zhang W, Yi S, Zhang J, Gu X, et al. Management and Outcomes of Patients With STEMI During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(11):1318-24. [PubMed ID: 32828614]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7438071]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.039.
  • 7.
    Page EM, Ariens RAS. Mechanisms of thrombosis and cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Thromb Res. 2021;200:1-8. [PubMed ID: 33493983]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7813504]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.005.
  • 8.
    Roubinian NH, Dusendang JR, Mark DG, Vinson DR, Liu VX, Schmittdiel JA, et al. Incidence of 30-Day Venous Thromboembolism in Adults Tested for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in an Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(7):997-1000. [PubMed ID: 33818615]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8022258]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0488.
  • 9.
    Jimenez D, Garcia-Sanchez A, Rali P, Muriel A, Bikdeli B, Ruiz-Artacho P, et al. Incidence of VTE and Bleeding Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2021;159(3):1182-96. [PubMed ID: 33217420]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7670889]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.005.
  • 10.
    de Barry O, Mekki A, Diffre C, Seror M, El Hajjam M, Carlier RY. Arterial and venous abdominal thrombosis in a 79-year-old woman with COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiol Case Rep. 2020;15(7):1054-7. [PubMed ID: 32351657]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7188660]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.04.055.
  • 11.
    Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052-9. [PubMed ID: 32320003]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7177629]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
  • 12.
    Long B, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(7):1504-7. [PubMed ID: 32317203]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7165109]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048.
  • 13.
    Bonanad C, Garcia-Blas S, Tarazona-Santabalbina F, Sanchis J, Bertomeu-Gonzalez V, Facila L, et al. The Effect of Age on Mortality in Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis With 611,583 Subjects. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(7):915-8. [PubMed ID: 32674819]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7247470]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.045.
  • 14.
    Kharroubi SA, Diab-El-Harake M. Sex-differences in COVID-19 diagnosis, risk factors and disease comorbidities: A large US-based cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1029190. [PubMed ID: 36466473]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9714345]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029190.
  • 15.
    Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Matczak S, Chalumeau M, Allali S, Toubiana J. COVID-19-Related Fatalities and Intensive-Care-Unit Admissions by Age Groups in Europe: A Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:560685. [PubMed ID: 33521004]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7840596]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.560685.
  • 16.
    Akinosoglou K, Schinas G, Almyroudi MP, Gogos C, Dimopoulos G. The impact of age on intensive care. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;84:101832. [PubMed ID: 36565961]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9769029]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101832.
  • 17.
    Al Abbasi B, Torres P, Ramos-Tuarez F, Dewaswala N, Abdallah A, Chen K, et al. Cardiac Troponin-I and COVID-19: A Prognostic Tool for In-Hospital Mortality. Cardiol Res. 2020;11(6):398-404. [PubMed ID: 33224386]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7666590]. https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1159.
  • 18.
    Garcia de Guadiana-Romualdo L, Calvo Nieves MD, Rodriguez Mulero MD, Calcerrada Alises I, Hernandez Olivo M, Trapiello Fernandez W, et al. MR-proADM as marker of endotheliitis predicts COVID-19 severity. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(5). e13511. [PubMed ID: 33569769]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7995076]. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13511.
  • 19.
    Fairweather D, Beetler DJ, Di Florio DN, Musigk N, Heidecker B, Cooper LJ. COVID-19, Myocarditis and Pericarditis. Circ Res. 2023;132(10):1302-19. [PubMed ID: 37167363]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10171304]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321878.
  • 20.
    Kaliyaperumal D, Bhargavi K, Ramaraju K, Nair KS, Ramalingam S, Alagesan M. Electrocardiographic Changes in COVID-19 Patients: A Hospital-based Descriptive Study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022;26(1):43-8. [PubMed ID: 35110843]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8783240]. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24045.
  • 21.
    Mele M, Tricarico L, Vitale E, Favia A, Croella F, Alfieri S, et al. Electrocardiographic findings and mortality in covid-19 patients hospitalized in different clinical settings. Heart Lung. 2022;53:99-103. [PubMed ID: 35248799]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8872825]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.02.007.
  • 22.
    Ghantous E, Szekely Y, Lichter Y, Levi E, Taieb P, Banai A, et al. Pericardial Involvement in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Prevalence, Associates, and Clinical Implications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7). e024363. [PubMed ID: 35311354]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9075494]. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024363.
  • 23.
    Nannoni S, de Groot R, Bell S, Markus HS. Stroke in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(2):137-49. [PubMed ID: 33103610]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7859578]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020972922.
  • 24.
    Ng JJ, Liang ZC, Choong A. The incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies. J Intensive Care. 2021;9(1):20. [PubMed ID: 33618760]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7897892]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00535-x.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles