Chronic total occlusions remain among the most challenging targets in PCI due to their intrinsic procedural complexities and the heightened risk of technical failure (
7). Over the past decades, however, significant advancements in device technology, refinement of procedural techniques, and increased operator experience have collectively translated into a substantial rise in success rates for CTO PCI (
7). One of the pivotal factors in successful CTO intervention is the assessment and strategic utilization of collateral circulation.
Collateral arteries play a key role in preserving myocardial viability by maintaining perfusion in regions subtended by an occluded vessel (
8-
10). Their functional significance extends to safeguarding the myocardium from ischemic injury during acute coronary insufficiency, thereby providing a critically important temporal “bridge” for revascularization (
6,
8,
9,
11). This is particularly relevant in LMCA disease. The LMCA supplies approximately 75% of the left ventricular myocardium in right-dominant circulation and up to 100% in left-dominant circulation, magnifying the hemodynamic consequences of its stenosis or occlusion. Chronic total occlusion of the LMCA is exceptionally rare and typically occurs only in patients with a dominant RCA supported by well-developed collaterals (
12).
Understanding the origin of collateral flow to a chronically occluded vessel is critical in procedural planning. McEntegart et al. reported that in cases of LAD artery CTO, collateral supply originated from the posterior descending artery (PDA) in 52.3% of patients, the right ventricular branch in 26.8%, and the conus branch in 5.9% (
6). The conal branch artery (CBA), also known as the conus branch or infundibular artery, is the first branch of the RCA in approximately half of the population (
13,
14). In the other half, CBA arises independently from a separate ostium within the right aortic sinus of Valsalva; in such cases, it is termed the “third” coronary artery (
13,
14). This vessel supplies the right ventricular outflow tract, and its visualization in coronary angiography is best achieved in LAO and RAO projections. Although its anatomical presence is anticipated in nearly 90% of individuals, connections from the CBA to distal vessel segments are relatively uncommon — being noted in only 27.3% of CTO cases in one series and as low as 2.6% in another (
4,
6).
From an interventional perspective, the CBA can serve several potential roles in CTO PCI. It may provide a stable anchor for guiding catheter positioning, facilitate passage of wires or balloons, and, in certain cases, act as a conduit for retrograde access to the distal true lumen of an occluded vessel (
4,
6). This characteristic becomes particularly valuable in complex lesions where conventional antegrade strategies fail. A persistent challenge in CTO PCI is the inability to direct the guidewire into the true lumen, which frequently results in procedural failure (
15,
16). Retrograde techniques — using channels such as septal collaterals, epicardial collaterals, or the CBA — have significantly improved crossing success, especially in lesions resistant to antegrade approaches.
The evolution of the retrograde strategy has been instrumental in increasing CTO PCI success rates from under 70% to approximately 90% in expert centers (
4,
17). Despite its benefits, retrograde PCI is associated with longer procedural times, greater contrast volume, prolonged fluoroscopy exposure, and a higher risk of periprocedural complications relative to antegrade methods (
17). Meta-analyses consistently demonstrate that antegrade PCI offers superior overall procedural and technical success rates, along with lower incidences of major adverse cardiac events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction (
17). Nevertheless, antegrade techniques cannot address all anatomical complexities — retrograde access remains indispensable in challenging subsets, especially in patients with ostial occlusions, ambiguous proximal caps, tortuous anatomy, or prior failed antegrade attempts.
Insights from Meng et al. provide an important perspective on the utility of the CBA in retrograde CTO PCI. In their study, procedural success rates exceeded 95%, independent of whether CBA was utilized. Interestingly, the group in which CBA was employed had significantly higher J-CTO scores, indicating greater lesion complexity, and showed a higher prevalence of retrograde techniques (
4). This group also exhibited longer fluoroscopy and total procedural times, consistent with the procedural demands of treating more complex anatomy. Importantly, the similarity in success rates between the CBA and non-CBA groups suggests that CBA utilization does not compromise procedural efficacy despite being reserved for challenging scenarios. These observations highlight the potential of the CBA as a valuable adjunct in CTO PCI, especially when septal or epicardial collaterals are unsuitable or absent (
4).
The selection of an optimal collateral pathway is multifactorial, driven primarily by lesion-specific characteristics, angiographic anatomy, and operator experience. While the routine use of the CBA appears limited by its anatomical variability and relative rarity of suitable distal connections, its role in select cases can be significant. This underscores the need for further investigation to identify the clinical and angiographic contexts in which CBA utilization yields the greatest procedural and long-term benefits. Future research should aim to delineate patient selection criteria, assess the impact of CBA use on long-term outcomes such as target vessel patency and patient quality of life, and optimize technical strategies for its integration into contemporary CTO PCI practice (
4,
17,
18).
3.1. Patient Perspective
Both patients expressed satisfaction with PCI results after refusing CABG and reported improved functional capacity during follow-up.
3.2. Learning Points
1. The total chronic occlusion of the LMCA is extremely rare but can be successfully treated percutaneously using contemporary retrograde techniques.
2. Proper selection of collateral pathway, conus branch or septal, is pivotal for safe and effective guidewire crossing when antegrade strategies fail.
3. In patients refusing CABG, retrograde PCI can achieve full revascularization and symptomatic relief without adverse events.
4. Careful procedural planning and use of dedicated guidewires and microcatheters are essential for success in complex LMCA CTO lesions.
3.3. Conclusions
In summary, both antegrade and retrograde strategies remain essential components of the CTO PCI toolkit. Antegrade remains the default initial approach due to its efficiency, safety, and resource profile, while retrograde — often via septal or less commonly CBA pathways — remains critical for anatomically complex lesions and failed antegrade attempts. As device technology and operator expertise continue to evolve, the ability to individualize strategy selection, including the judicious use of CBA collaterals, will be central to improving outcomes for patients with complex CTOs.