Job stress adversely affects health at the individual level; it also negatively affects healthcare organizations and work output. At the individual level, stress is in association with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance.
In the current study, there was no significant difference in insulin resistance among hospital departments, but there was a significant difference in age between the groups. Previous studies showed higher levels of insulin resistance in older people than younger ones and a positive relationship between age and insulin resistance (
17,
18). Therefore, to study the effect of job stress on insulin resistance, age was considered as a confounding variable and ANCOVA was used to eliminate the effect of this factor. The results of ANCOVA as well as one-way ANOVA indicated no significant difference in insulin resistance between the three groups. Therefore, based on the results of the current study, insulin resistance does not depend on the working department, but it depends on the age.
However, in the current study, the relationship between age and insulin resistance was weak (r = 0. 3, P = 0.004). The study by Karakelides et al. on the older adults showed that age-related reductions in insulin sensitivity was due to an age-related increase in adiposity rather than a consequence of advanced chronological age (
19).
In addition, another study showed that insulin sensitivity in males up to 60 - 70 years was more depends on body fat mass than age (
20).
A few published studies evaluated the source and level of stress among healthcare staff (
15,
21); according to the finding of these studies, the main source of stress was heavy workload and inadequate staff. However, to the authors’ best knowledge, the current study was the first study that compared insulin resistance and job stress level simultaneously among the staff of different hospital departments.
The results of the study showed that the staff of ICU, CCU and emergency ward experienced greater job stress than the other ones. This may not be surprising given that ICU and CCU staff usually faces high levels of stress at work, particularly due to the related clinical duties and death and that the ICU is especially stressful. Goodfellow et al. showed that ICU staff (physicians and nurses) exposed higher levels of stress than a normal working population (
22).
In the current study, there was no correlation between insulin resistance and stress score. The study by Shiloah on 39 patients without diabetes and acute psychotic stress indicated an inverse correlation between β-cell function and insulin sensitivity with stress score (
23). In another study, acute psychological stress (foot shock stress) in mice resulted in the elevation of blood glucose levels in both glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests (
24). The difference may be due to the type of stress and the method used to estimate insulin resistance.
To assess insulin resistance in the subjects, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp is the best technique, but it was costly, time-consuming and required more cooperation of hospital staff. Consequently, this method did not use, which was a limitation of the present study.
In spite of the current study, some previous studies reported a correlation between insulin resistance and BMI (
25,
26). Trirogoff et al. reported that the primary determinant of insulin resistance in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is BMI, specifically, fat mass. Another study on 132 patients with type 2 diabetes showed as BMI increased, the patients exhibited higher levels of insulin resistance and lower levels of insulin sensitivity. In this study glucose tolerance test was used to assess insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity indexes (
25).
A longitudinal population-based cohort study showed that one standard deviation increase in rate of change in BMI corresponded to a decrease in insulin sensitivity by 19%; this study also quantified insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (
27).
The basis of this difference may be due to the study population and various methods used to estimate insulin resistance.
The current study had several limitations. First, there were small number of subjects in some departments and the cooperation of physicians was poor.
Low number of participants in the study results in low power of statistical analysis. The insulin resistance did not measure using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. As previously mentioned, this is the best method to evaluate insulin resistance.
5.1. Conclusion
It seems that the staff of ICU is exposed to more job stress than other department staff, but there was no relationship between the job stress and insulin resistance among hospital staff. In addition, it is better to pay more attention to the age of the selected subjects working in CCU, ICU and emergency ward. However, further studies are needed to test job stress and insulin resistance in the other hospitals affiliated to AJA University to assess the correlation between job stress score and insulin resistance level.