Data were presented as Mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). In the pretest, none of the body weight, body fat percentage, blood pressure, total cholesterol level, TG, and serum LDL and HDL variables showed significant differences among the study groups (P ≤ 0.05). However, to eliminate the effect of the covariate variable (pretest scores), the ANCOVA test was used to perform posttest between-group comparisons.
The results of posttest showed mean body weight significantly reduced in the aerobic exercise (t = 12.329, P ≤ 0.001), garlic extract (t = 2.792, P ≤ 0.05), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (t = 10.350, P ≤ 0.001) groups, while no significant change was observed in the placebo and control groups (P > 0.05). The results of ANCOVA test also indicated a significant difference in the body weight among the study groups (F = 48.120, P ≤ 0.001) so that a significant weight loss was seen in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.001), garlic extract (P ≤ 0.05), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001) groups compared to the control group. Further, aerobic exercise and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract groups showed significantly more body weight loss than the garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001) (
Table 1).
| Variable Group | Weight | Fat (%) | Systolic Blood Pressure | Diastolic Blood Pressure |
|---|
| Aerobic exercise | | | | |
| Pretest | 106.9 ± 5.5 | 25.5 ± 1.2 | 145.3 ± 1.6 | 93.1 ± 1.9 |
| Posttest | 98 ± 5.1 | 22.4 ± 1.09 | 134.9 ± 1.8 | 88.6 ± 1.2 |
| Garlic extract | | | | |
| Pretest | 105.3 ± 5.3 | 23.6 ± 1.3 | 143.5 ± 1.5 | 93.7 ± 5.5 |
| Posttest | 103.2 ± 5.5 | 22.7 ± 1.4 | 135.8 ± 1.7 | 88.9 ± 1.4 |
| Aerobic exercise + garlic extract | | | | |
| Pretest | 105.7 ± 5.9 | 23.5 ± 1.06 | 147.1 ± 1.4 | 94.6 ± 1.7 |
| Posttest | 95.1 ± 5.1 | 20.03 ± 0.8 | 133.5 ± 1.8 | 86.2 ± 1.0 |
| Placebo | | | | |
| Pretest | 111.2 ± 5.7 | 25.88 ± 1.5 | 146. ± 1.7 | 91.5 ± 1.4 |
| Posttest | 110.9 ± 5.8 | 25.6 ± 1.5 | 147.9 ± 1.8 | 92.3 ± 1.4 |
| Control | | | | |
| Pretest | 106.1 ± 6.5 | 24.6 ± 1.36 | 147.6 ± 1.5 | 94.3 ± 1.8 |
| Posttest | 107.6 ± 6.4 | 25.35 ± 1.4 | 148.2 ± 1.7 | 93.0 ± 1.5 |
Moreover, the results of posttest test showed a significant decrease in the mean body fat percentage in the aerobic exercise (t = 7.375, P ≤ 0.001), garlic extract (t = 4.159, P ≤ 0.05), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (t = 8.377, P ≤ 0.001) groups, while no significant change was observed in the control and placebo groups (P > 0.05). The results of ANCOVA test also showed a significant difference between groups in mean fat percentage (F = 26.999, P ≤ 0.001) so that a significant decrease was observed in fat percentage in the aerobic exercise group (P ≤ 0.001) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, aerobic exercise and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract groups indicated a significantly more decrease in the body fat percentage compared with the garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001) (
Table 1).
Furthermore, the results of posttest showed a significant drop in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the aerobic exercise (t = 7.997, P ≤ 0.001 and t = 5.164, P ≤ 0.001, respectively), garlic extract (t = 10.286, P ≤ 0.001 and t = 5.164, P ≤ 0.001, respectively), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (t = 5.273, P ≤ 0.001 and t = 6.013, P ≤ 0.001, respectively) groups, while no significant change was found in the control and placebo groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the results of ANCOVA test showed a significant difference among groups in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (F = 14.329, P ≤ 0.001 and F = 22.393, P ≤ 0.001, respectively) so that systolic and diastolic blood pressures reduced significantly in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.05 and 0 ≤ 0.001, respectively), garlic extract (P ≤ 0.05 and 0 ≤ 0.001, respectively), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001 and 0 ≤ 0.001, respectively) groups compared with control group (
Table 1).
Furthermore, the results of posttest indicated a significant decrease in mean total cholesterol in the aerobic exercise (t = 2.647, P ≤ 0.05), garlic extract (t = 2.987, P ≤ 0.05), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (t = 3.943, P ≤ 0.05) groups, while no significant change was observed in the control and placebo groups (P > 0.05). The results of the ANCOVA test also showed a significant difference among groups in the mean total cholesterol level (F = 9.738, P ≤ 0.001) so that total cholesterol level reduced significantly in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.01) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001) groups compared to the control group. Further, aerobic exercise and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract groups indicated a significantly higher decrease of total cholesterol compared to the garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001) (
Figure 1).
Total serum cholesterol levels in different groups, a: significant difference with pretest (P ≤ 0.05), b: significant difference with control group (P ≤ 0.01)
The results of posttest showed a significant drop in the mean TG in the aerobic exercise (
t = 3.637, P ≤ 0.01) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (
t = 2.599, P ≤ 0.05) groups, while there was no significant change in the garlic extract, control, and placebo groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, the results of ANCOVA test indicated a significant difference among groups in the mean TG level (F = 3.747, P ≤ 0.01) so that a significant decrease was found in serum TG level in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.05) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.05) groups in comparison with the control group (
Figure 2).
Serum TG level changes in different groups, a: significant difference with pretest (P ≤ 0.05), b: significant difference with control group (P ≤ 0.05)
The posttest showed mean LDL significantly decreased in the aerobic exercise (t = 6.726, P ≤ 0.001), garlic extract (t = 19.3, P ≤ 0.001), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (t = 11.610, P ≤ 0.001) groups, while no significant change was seen in the control and placebo groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the ANCOVA test revealed a significant difference between groups in serum LDL (F = 44.883, P ≤ 0.001) so that a significant decrease was found in serum LDL in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.001), garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001), and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001) groups in comparison with control group. Moreover, aerobic exercise plus garlic extract group showed a significantly higher LDL reduction than garlic extract and aerobic exercise groups (P ≤ 0.01) (
Figure 3).
Serum LDL level changes in different groups, a: significant difference with pretest (P ≤ 0.001), b: significant difference with control group (P ≤ 0.001), c: significant difference with garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001), d: significant difference with aerobic exercise group (P ≤ 0.001)
As for HDL, the posttest showed a significant increase in the aerobic exercise (
t = 6.269, P ≤ 0.001) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (
t = 6.498, P ≤ 0.001) groups, while no significant change was observed in the garlic extract, control, and placebo groups (P > 0.05). The results of the ANCOVA test also indicated a significant difference in mean serum HDL between groups (F = 25.178, P ≤ 0.001) so that serum HDL level increased significantly in the aerobic exercise (P ≤ 0.001) and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract (P ≤ 0.001) groups compared to control group. Furthermore, aerobic exercise and aerobic exercise plus garlic extract groups indicated a significant increase in HDL level in comparison with the garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001) (
Figure 4).
Serum HDL level changes in different groups, a: significant difference with pretest (P ≤ 0.001), b: significant difference with control group (P ≤ 0.001), c: significant difference with garlic extract group (P ≤ 0.001)