The severity and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 vary among patients, influenced by demographic factors and underlying health conditions. In addition, host genetic differences have been shown to play an important role in the severity of the disease. In recent studies, polymorphisms related to the immune response have been investigated to better understand susceptibility to severe forms of COVID-19 (
23). Although GWAS reports have suggested a possible association between variants in the IFNAR2 and OAS3 genes (which are important in antiviral immune pathways) and disease severity, population-based findings in this area remain unclear, highlighting the need for further studies.
In this study, to better understand the factors affecting disease severity, we first examined clinical and demographic variables such as age, comorbidities, and respiratory symptoms in 315 Iranian patients with COVID-19 (confirmed by qRT-PCR) in two groups: Non-severe and severe (admission to ICU). We then investigated the role of two important genetic polymorphisms-rs2236757 in the IFNAR2 gene and rs10735079 in the OAS3 gene.
Analysis of 209 non-severe and 106 severe cases revealed that older age, underlying diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disorders, as well as symptoms such as cough and shortness of breath (dyspnea), were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity. These findings indicated a notable clinical difference between the two groups. In line with our findings, previous studies report that underlying conditions contribute to a substantial proportion of severe COVID-19 cases worldwide (
24). In a study by Guan et al. in China, from 1,590 COVID-19 patients, 399 (25.1%) had at least one underlying disease, and 130 (8.2%) had two or more. The most common comorbidities in these patients were hypertension (16.9%), diabetes (8.2%), heart disease (3.7%), and chronic kidney disease (1.3%) (
25). Also, in another study by Hashemi-Shahri et al. on 413 COVID-19 patients in Iran, underlying diseases, including cardiovascular, liver, and lung diseases, hypertension, and rheumatism, were identified as risk factors for developing severe forms of COVID-19 (
19). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 studies (6,270 patients) reported that approximately 41% of patients had underlying diseases, which were significantly associated with worse outcome. The strongest associations were observed for cerebrovascular disorders, cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung disease, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension (
26). Consistent with these data, our study also demonstrated that clinical comorbidities play a dominant role in determining COVID-19 severity. These clinical characteristics therefore appear to contribute more substantially to disease progression, whereas, as shown in the following section, the investigated SNPs did not exhibit a comparable effect.
When we examined the association between rs2236757 and rs10735079 with COVID-19 severity, our findings showed the G allele of rs10735079 appeared to be more prevalent in severe cases, but this association was not significant. Furthermore, neither the OR analysis nor the interaction between these two variants showed a significant association with disease severity. Although an OR > 1 for rs10735079 indicated a trend towards an increased risk of severe COVID-19. In line with our results, the A allele of the rs2236757 polymorphism has been reported to be associated with reduced COVID-19 severity in 954 patients studied, supporting a protective role for this variant (
27). In a study by Dieter et al. in a Brazilian population, similar to our results, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of rs2236757 between non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients. There was also no significant difference between survivors and non-survivors. However, in non-white patients, the AA genotype was associated with more severe clinical outcomes, indicating a possible role of ethnicity in the impact of this polymorphism (
28). Similarly, another study on 154 participants found no significant difference in the genotype distribution of rs10735079 in the OAS3 gene (P = 0.091), although it reported a significant association between rs2236757 and COVID-19 severity and symptoms such as shortness of breath and sore throat (P = 0.001) (
16). Also, a large study by Pairo-Castineira et al. with 2,244 patients admitted to ICU in the United Kingdom also reported different results, finding that the rs10735079 polymorphism in the OAS1/OAS2/OAS3 gene cluster as well as the A allele of the rs2236757 gene were significantly associated with increased COVID-19 severity (
8), which is in contrast to the results of our study.
These conflicting results suggest that although these polymorphisms may play a role in immune-related pathways, their individual or combined effects may be modulated by other genetic or environmental factors. Alternatively, our study sample size may not have been sufficient to detect genetic effects. In the current study, some limitations were found that should be addressed in future research. Healthy and deceased individuals were not included in this study, and therefore no comparisons were made between them. Also, further studies including different ethnicities and larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm this finding.
4.1. Conclusions
Our findings revealed that clinical factors such as older age, diabetes, hypertension, and dyspnea were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity. In contrast, no statistically significant associations were observed for the genetic polymorphisms rs2236757 (IFNAR2) and rs10735079 (OAS3). However, the higher frequency of the rs10735079 OAS3 GG genotype in severe cases suggests a potential trend that warrants further consideration. Given the complexity of host-virus interactions, it is likely that disease severity is influenced by a broader network of genetic variants. Therefore, examining additional SNPs across immune-related genes could provide a more comprehensive understanding of genetic susceptibility to COVID-19. Future studies with larger and more ethnically diverse cohorts, alongside functional analyses, are recommended to clarify the role of these and other variants, and to investigate their biological impact on antiviral immune responses.