Extracellular enzymes, particularly phospholipases and proteases, are widely regarded as key virulence-associated traits in
Aspergillus because they can facilitate tissue penetration and modulate host defenses (
12). In this study, we assessed these activities in clinical
A. flavus isolates obtained from three anatomical sources. The isolates were recovered from BAL, sinus discharge, and nail scrapings, supporting the view that
A. flavus is encountered across diverse clinical settings. This observation is consistent with reports from Iran and other regions with hot, dry climates, where
A. flavus is frequently detected in a broad spectrum of specimens (
15,
16). These findings underscore both the environmental fitness of this species and its clinical relevance in these geographic areas. For species-level screening, β-tubulin PCR–RFLP followed by AlwI (BspPI) digestion yielded the same two-fragment profile in every isolate (≈296 and 254 bp). This uniform pattern aligns with previous work suggesting that β-tubulin-based PCR–RFLP can improve identification reliability compared with morphology alone, which may be affected by phenotypic overlap and culture conditions (
11,
17). From a practical perspective, the consistency of the restriction pattern indicates that this assay can serve as a rapid and inexpensive preliminary method, particularly in laboratories in which routine sequencing is not available. At the same time, the molecular approach used here has important constraints. Only one restriction enzyme was applied, and sequencing was performed for 15 isolates (33.3%). Therefore, the overall discriminatory ability of PCR–RFLP in our dataset is inherently limited. Members of the
A. flavus complex (e.g.,
A. oryzae and
A. nomiae) can be genetically similar and may not be fully distinguished by single-enzyme RFLP patterns (
16). For this reason, sequencing remains the most reliable option when definitive identification is required. Regarding virulence traits, phospholipase activity was detected in 57.8% of isolates, which is comparable to earlier studies on
A. flavus (
11). Although BAL isolates had a higher mean phospholipase EAI than sinus and nail isolates, the difference among specimen types was not significant (P = 0.084). Similar results have been reported previously (
12), suggesting that phospholipase production may not be strongly determined by anatomical source. The variability we observed may instead reflect isolate-to-isolate differences, local host conditions, or limited statistical power. In contrast, protease activity was more frequent (71.1%) and differed significantly by source (P = 0.032). Sinus isolates showed higher protease activity than BAL isolates, and this difference remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment (Z = −2.585, adjusted P = 0.029; η
2H = 0.117). Although this pattern may suggest that protease expression varies across anatomical niches, it should be interpreted cautiously. Subgroup sizes were modest (BAL, n = 17; sinus, n = 15; nail, n = 13), and the study did not include patient-level clinical metadata such as disease severity, infection versus colonization status, treatment, or outcomes. Therefore, these findings should be considered exploratory and primarily hypothesis-generating rather than evidence of clinical or pathogenic associations.
The higher protease activity in sinus-derived
A. flavus isolates is consistent with reports linking proteolysis to chronic rhinosinusitis and other upper-airway presentations. Proteases have been proposed to contribute to epithelial damage and persistence within sinonasal tissues; however, the mechanisms and their in vivo relevance remain incompletely defined. In our work, the isolates were archived and lacked patient identifiers and detailed clinical information. As a result, we could not relate enzyme activity to disease severity, colonization versus infection, treatment, or clinical outcomes. Future studies combining enzyme phenotyping with robust clinical datasets are needed to determine whether elevated protease activity has prognostic or therapeutic implications in sinonasal aspergillosis (
18).
Despite the value of these findings, several limitations should be considered. Although combining phenotypic assays with molecular identification strengthens the study, sequencing was performed for only a subset of isolates because of cost constraints. Consequently, the present data do not permit firm estimates of the diagnostic performance of PCR–RFLP (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, or predictive values). In addition, incomplete sequencing limits our ability to fully distinguish all members of the A. flavus complex. Larger, preferably multicenter, studies with sequence confirmation for all isolates, broader virulence profiling, and more comprehensive molecular analyses are needed to better clarify the pathogenic potential and clinical significance of these isolates.