On the one hand, the effectiveness of existing anti-IBR vaccines or drugs has not been approved by the majority of scientists (
6,
11) and on the other hand, treatment based on suppressing or changing the desired gene expression has minimal side effects compared to other treatment methods. Therefore, in recent decades, gene therapy has been welcomed as an alternative method of treatment (
12).
Genetics has been involved in the treatment of herpes viruses in the recent years due to the low specificity and adverse effects of chemical drugs. New studies have been developed on the antiviral approaches of gene therapy against these viruses. Accordingly, designing and developing methods for evaluating such treatments is necessary. Hence, in the present study, the early stages of developing an approach to assessing to genetic treatments against BHV-1 were performed.
One way to evaluate such molecules is to introduce them into cell lines that express the genes they are supposed to suppress. For this purpose, the first step is the cloning of these target sequences into an appropriate plasmid for transfection into a particular cell line (
13).
IBRV UL25 is a nuclear gene that is conserved among members of the
Herpesviride family. Its necessity for the assembly and addition of the tegument layer to the virion encouraged the authors of the present study to select it. In a study performed by Bowman et al., using the UL-25 gene cloning in pET41 plasmid and its expression in cells, the researchers showed the role of UL25 in the formation of a stable capsid and the proper packaging of the viral genome (
2). Non-expression of
BHV-1 UL25 occurred in MDBK cells. Several works have been conducted to study the sequence and structure of the
UL25 gene since then, all of which have shown this gene is conserved among all subfamilies of
Herpesviridae (
2).
UL25 is a DNA packaging tegument protein and its main role is considered to be DNA encapsidatoin. The placement of the serine protease substrate domain in UL25 indicates that this is the cleavage site of serine proteases that facilitate DNA encapsidatoin, and its conservation indicates it has an important role for the virus life cycle (
14).
In the present study, for permanent expression of the target genes, the transduction was performed by a lentiviral vector. Plasmids were also used for gene expression induction after the transfection although the duration of gene expression was low (
15). Lentiviral vectors could infect almost all types of cells and induce remarkable sufficient gene expression in their host cells for a long time. Furthermore, owing to their potent to integrate into the host chromatin, their desire to eliminate all pathogenic genes in the vector, and finally, because there is no interference with the pre-existing antiviral reactions of immune system, lentiviral vectors LVs possess an effective delivery. Moreover, LVs can transmit large nucleotide sequences (3000 bp) and the probability of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis is low after their application.
Given the reasons mentioned above, lentiviral vectors were used to express the target genes in the desired cells and the first step for the preparation of these vectors is the cloning of the desired gene in the transfer vector in lentiviral packaging systems (
16,
17).
Among the available lentiviral plasmids, pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-cGFP-T2A-Puro, which has ampicillin and puromycin resistance genes, was selected for ease of access and handling. Both antibiotics are easy to achieve. On the other hand, the vector has a GFP gene as a marker protein, which is applicable to the diagnosis of transfection efficiency (
18,
19). This plasmid passes strong
RSV,
CMV, and
EF1 promoters for expression of the desired gene and GFP. The multiple cloning sites in this plasmid include the cleavage sites of the most restriction enzymes. Jafarzade et al. firstly increased the efficiency of LVs (pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-cGFP-T2A-Puro) and epEGFP-N1 for induction their desired gene in 293T cells (
20). Ranjibar et al. amplified the Cop-GFP from the pCDH plasmid for developing a phagemid for production of reporter mammalian-cell (
21).
There are some applications of RNAi against the members of
Herpesviridae. For example, siRNAs were designed by Jia and Sun for suppression of gamma
Herpesvirinae ORF-45 to demonstrate its performance. BHK-21 cells expressed it were developed to evaluate these siRNAs (
22).
Wiebusch et al. designed siRNAs for HCMV-UL54 and produced
U373 cells expressing
UL54 sub-replicons after cloning the target gene segments into appropriate plasmids and transfecting them (
23).
Zhe et al. targeted
HSV-1-UL39 by their siRNAs. They evaluated siRNAs by designing, cloning, and providing an ICP6 reporting system (
24).
Wilkes and Kania suppressed
FHV-1-gD by siRNA molecules decrease viral titer (
25). Specific evaluation of these two siRNAs was performed with gene cloning and plasmid transfusion into Crandell-Rees cat kidney cells (
25).
Narute et al. designed two anti
BHV1-UL25 siRNAs. However, in their study, they did not provide a proprietary evaluation reporter system (
7).
There are some researches in which lentiviruses mediated RNAi have been applied for other viruses
Herpesviridae family; Wang et al. suppressed LMP2A with lentivirus-mediated RNAi in GT38 cells (
26). Song et al. used lentivectors for expression of IBRV gD shRNAs and with TCID50 assay showed the reduction in viral titer. They transfected pcDNA3-gD plasmid and recombinant LVs expressing shRNA into 293T cells and RNAi efficacy was confirmed utilizing Western blot (
6). Amjadimanesh et al. applied BHV1-UL25 shRNAs and showed that they had considerable antiviral attributes in challenge with virus and MDBK cells expressed UL25 (
27).
5.1. Conclusions
The findings revealed that the BHV1-UL25 target fragment was successfully cloned in the desired plasmid and in the future studies; it will be accessible for transfection of the appropriate cell lines using lentiviral packing systems to produce specific reporter cells.