Due to its immune privileged status, corneal graft is the most successful tissue transplantation in humans (
5). About one-third of all corneal graft failures are due to graft rejection (
6). The reported rate of rejection episodes varies considerably from 2.3% to 68% (
7,
8). Graft survival rate after PKP is estimated to be 86% at one year, 73% at five years, and 62% at ten years, mostly because of corneal allograft rejection (
9).
Corneal graft rejection is a complex immune process in which the host’s immune system recognizes the foreign antigens of the corneal graft; it leads to an efferent-afferent immune response against the allograft and finally epithelial and/or endothelial rejection line, stromal rejection band, anterior chamber reaction with keratic precipitates, and corneal edema develop (
10).
If recognized early and treated aggressively with corticosteroids, most episodes of graft rejection do not cause irreversible graft failure. Each layer of the cornea may undergo rejection, with endothelial rejection being the most severe form. Typically, epithelial graft rejection begins as an elevated, epithelial ridge often near the graft-host junction and progresses centripetally, leaving a hazy irregular epithelium behind that will be finally replaced by host epithelium (
3). This rejection is marked by the elevated epithelial rejection line, representing damaged donor epithelial cells. It is usually seen in the periphery and stains with fluorescein or Rose Bengal (
3,
8). The hazy epithelium behind the rejection line is gradually replaced by recipient epithelium. Over days to several weeks, superficial epithelial infiltrates (Kaye’s dots) may appear near the suture lines and progress centripetally (
3).
Persistent epithelial defect and epithelial rejection rings may also develop (
3). In epithelial rejection, the eye is generally quiet and asymptomatic or may be mildly inflamed. Edema, keratic precipitates, and infiltrates are not seen. This type of rejection is usually self-limited and subsides within weeks as the donor epithelium is replaced by host epithelium; however, it is important due to high association with other types of rejection (
3).
Our patient showed a new atypical presentation of epithelial graft rejection. It presented as a disc-shaped superficial haziness of the epithelium that was limited by the suture lines, sparing peripheral graft as well as the graft-host junction. This presentation, although different from typical linear pattern, responded well to corticosteroid therapy.