Cancer is one of the major global health problems (
14), and PCa, which comprises 7.1% of all cancers in men, is the most frequent cancer in men (
2). In Iran, PCa is the third most frequent cancer in men and the sixth most prevalent cancer (
15). Several shreds of evidence indicated that viral infection-induced inflammation of the prostate might increase the risk of PCa, so it is suggested that viruses may associate with prostate carcinogenesis (
16). The carcinogenic effect of BKV is proven in rodent and animal models, and according to the research of IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), BKV is “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (
7). There is strong evidence that BKV is involved in PCa development. It is interesting to know that in two studies conducted by Das et al. (
17) and Russo et al. (
18), BKV LTAg expression was observed merely in cancerous prostate tissues but not in normal tissues. Additionally, immunohistochemistry analysis in Russo et al. (
18) study indicated that in cancer cells, which were LTAg positive, p53 was located in the cytoplasm, while in LTAg-negative cells, p53 was located in the nucleus, emphasizing the role of BKV as a cofactor in the pathogenesis of PCa.
Das et al. declared that the BKV DNA was confirmed in 79% (11/14) of cancerous prostates but just in 27% (4/14) of non-prostate cancers, and LTAg expression was detectable in 47% (13/28) of cancerous prostates, and 14% (4/29) of non-prostate cancer subjects. Based on this study, there was a significant difference in the expression of BKV between normal and cancerous prostates (P = 0.008) (
17). Zambrano et al. (
19) demonstrated that the BKV DNA was presented in 25% (3/12) of prostate specimens by the PCR method and Lau et al. (
20) confirmed the existence of BKV DNA in tumor cells in 7% (2/30) of prostate specimens using in situ hybridization (ISH). In four studies conducted in Italy, the BKV DNA was found in 23% (6/26) (
21), 85% (22/26) (18), 32% (18/56) (
22), and 44% (31/71) (
23) of cancerous prostate tissues. Balis et al. (
24) (Greece) revealed that the percentage of BKV DNA in PCa tissue was 19% (8/42). In a study by Akgul et al. (
25) in Germany, the presence of BK virus was verified in only 1.17% (1/85) of PCa tissues.
Our results, which are parallel with previous studies, indicated that there are significant differences in the BKV DNA between positive cancerous prostate tissues and non-cancerous prostate tissues (P = 0.003). Our results are parallel with Mischitelli et al. (
23), Delbue et al. (
22), Russo et al. (
18), and Das et al. (
17). They indicated that the BKV DNA positivity was more frequent in malignant than in normal prostatic tissue. Whereas, some studies, in contrast, did not find a significant difference in BKV DNA positivity between malignant and benign tissue specimens (
21,
26). Discrepancies among these studies may be due to different methods of virus detection, differences in sample size, type of samples (fresh or paraffin-embedded tissue samples), differences in the prevalence of the virus in different populations, and the ability of the virus to have latency and reactivation state (
7).
In this study, the Gleason score of the tumor ranged from 5 to 10. Out of 33 cases who were positive for BKV DNA, the highest frequency of 30% BKV DNA positivity was found in cancerous prostate tissues with Gleason score 7, and the lowest frequency of BKV DNA was found in Gleason scores 6, 8, and 9 (4/33, 12%) (P = 0.094). However, this result contradicts the results of a study performed by Anzivino et al. (
21) that indicated the highest frequency of viral positivity within Gleason scores 8 and 9. Considerably, Delbue et al. (
22) reported that the highest frequency of viral positivity was observed in Gleason score 6 (12/18, 66%).