The current study aimed to investigate the occurrence of pathogenic
Leptospira species (
L. interrogans) in three mammal host samples in the Amol region, providing a comprehensive assessment of its presence in a significant agricultural setting. The methodological approach, including culture-based identification, dark-field microscopy, and molecular assays, offers evidence for the remarkable presence of
L. interrogans in the region. We know that rodents are the most important reservoirs of the bacterium in human societies, especially in rural areas (
5). But, on the other hand, in the northern regions of Iran, farm animals such as cows and sheep are present and feed in agricultural fields before and after harvest. Therefore, conditions are created for these animals to feed in a common field in a region with a high rainfall amount and come into close contact with each other, which will greatly increase the risk of infection transmission between them (
20,
21).
Many studies in Iran have investigated the seroprevalence or molecular detection of
Leptospira (
22,
23). In a study conducted in Lorestan province, the seroprevalence of
L. interrogans was reported as 26.05% in cattle, 22.48% in sheep, and 14.87% in goats, highlighting cattle and sheep as the most exposed species in this region (
24). Similarly, a research in Kurdistan province mentioned that the seroprevalence of
Leptospira in sheep, goats, and cows was (2/30) 6.7%, (1/31) 3.2%, and 0%, respectively (
25). These results are almost consistent with the results of the present study, which showed that
Leptospira was not isolated from cattle samples using the culture method while molecular identification using real-time PCR and simple PCR methods confirm the presence of
Leptospira in cattle samples. The use of real-time PCR targeting the lipL32 gene, a conserved marker for pathogenic
Leptospira, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting leptospires across different sample types. In the molecular identification and confirmation of culture-positive samples of
Leptospira isolates, no difference was observed between the traditional PCR method and real-time PCR, and all positive cases were common. The complementary use of conventional PCR provided additional validation, ensuring reliable detection of the pathogen. This multi-faceted approach is critical, considering that
Leptospira can often be underreported due to variability in detection sensitivity across different methods and sample types.
The MAT method is the gold standard for detection of
Leptospira serovars, but such research challenges the performance of this method in detecting
Leptospira. The MAT method is widely recognized as the gold standard for serological detection of
Leptospira, as it allows for specific serovar identification and provides a benchmark for comparing alternative diagnostic approaches. In the present study, although MAT was not applied, the performance of molecular methods including conventional PCR and real-time PCR can be indirectly evaluated against the known sensitivity and specificity benchmarks reported for MAT in the literature. The comparison highlights that molecular techniques, particularly real-time PCR, offer distinct advantages such as rapid turnaround, higher sensitivity for low bacterial loads, and applicability to a wide range of sample types including environmental and asymptomatic animal samples. This underscores the value of these molecular methods in complementing or, in certain contexts, potentially substituting MAT for epidemiological investigations, especially in regions where serovar panels are limited or unavailable (
8,
9,
26).
The large number of subspecies and serovars in the genus
Leptospira has further increased the need to classify and differentiate them in MAT. Serotyping by the method of leptospirosis reference laboratories is common, but this method is expensive, time-consuming, and very difficult to perform because, to achieve a completely accurate result, the strain of interest must be exposed to at least 200 antisera against standard serovars. In addition, reading the results is also difficult and requires a lot of expertise and experience (
26,
27). Owing to the diverse array of prevalent local circulating pathogenic serovars across various geographical regions, serodiagnostic assessments, including MAT or alternative methodologies that do not encompass local serovars and their corresponding protein antigens, exhibit inherent limitations and may inadequately identify the disease as well as perform antibody surveillance in specific locales.
So, the use of sequencing-based methods such as MLST and multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) is becoming more common today and provides more comprehensive and reliable results (
28,
29). The utilization of MLST not only facilitated the precise identification of STs but also provided a framework for comparing isolates with global datasets. By submitting these allelic profiles to the PubMLST database, this study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on
Leptospira genetic diversity and supports epidemiological tracking of zoonotic and livestock-associated strains. The allelic profiles obtained from MLST analysis in the present study offer valuable insights into the genetic diversity and STs of
Leptospira circulating in the region.
The allelic profiles and accession numbers of the MLST genes demonstrate that all rodent isolates belonged to ST252, while the sheep isolate was identified as ST330. The ST252 and ST330 have been frequently associated with rodents and are considered a common ST in
L. interrogans strains isolated in Southeast Asia from rat populations (
19). The identification of ST330 in a sheep isolate aligns with previous reports that have linked this ST, highlighting its potential adaptation to domestic animal reservoirs (
19). To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data reporting the presence of ST252 or ST330 in human cases of leptospirosis. Therefore, any potential transmission of these STs from animals to humans remains hypothetical, and further molecular investigations on human samples are required to assess their zoonotic risk.
5.1. Conclusions
Rodents, as natural reservoirs, were confirmed to be the main source of Leptospira in the Amol agricultural region, with 18.75% of urine samples testing positive via culture. The detection of Leptospira DNA in cattle (2.27%) and sheep urine samples by both conventional and real-time PCR, despite negative culture results in cattle, indicates that these livestock act as secondary reservoirs, potentially facilitating pathogen transmission in shared agricultural environments. The use of both lipL32 gene sequencing and MLST provided complementary molecular confirmation, revealing that rodent isolates belonged to ST252 and the sheep isolate to ST330, thereby enhancing the understanding of local strain distribution. These findings highlight the high environmental contamination in the study area and underscore the importance of targeted surveillance and preventive measures among farm animals and workers in northern Iran.