Seasonal influenza, mostly caused by IAV, primarily H1N1 and H3N2, undergoes continuous genetic mutation, resulting in novel variants that impose a global disease burden and complicate detection (
22). In this study, the optimized RT-LAMP assays exhibited high sensitivity and specificity. The detection limit was estimated at 67 copies per reaction for H1N1 and 42 copies per reaction for H3N2 in preliminary sensitivity testing, and these values exceed those reported in some prior RT-LAMP studies (
23). Importantly, the RT-LAMP assay described here targets the conserved
M gene of IAV and therefore detects all IAV subtypes without differentiation. The H1N1- and H3N2-specific sensitivity data presented in this study were obtained from separate reactions using purified RNA from each subtype individually. Analytical specificity was rigorously evaluated using RNA extracts from positive clinical samples of other prevalent respiratory virus (
10). The findings of the present study showed that exclusive amplification was observed only in reactions in which IAV RNA served as the template. This observation supports the exceptional specificity of the optimized RT-LAMP assays for detecting seasonal IAV.
Although cross-contamination poses a substantial challenge in conventional LAMP assays, both real-time and colorimetric RT-LAMP methods mitigate this risk through closed-tube detection systems (
8). The colorimetric RT-LAMP assay enables visual interpretation without specialized instruments. Our data show that HNB provides a detection threshold comparable to that of SYBR Green I, unlike the compromised sensitivity observed with calcein (
7). During the reaction, magnesium pyrophosphate formation causes HNB to shift from violet to sky blue, enabling clear visual interpretation (
9). This closed-tube system also minimizes the cross-contamination risks common in conventional LAMP. To further optimize real-time RT-LAMP assays, we monitored amplification curves using fluorescent signals generated by SYBR Green I. Additionally, melting curve analyses were routinely performed after real-time RT-LAMP assays, providing a convenient approach for analyzing LAMP products. In this study, all RT-LAMP assays were conducted using real-time, colorimetric, or combined methods.
In most published studies, IAV target sequences have been obtained using 2 approaches: In vitro RNA transcription and PCR-based DNA amplification. RNA quantities and copy numbers were quantified after transcription. Subsequently, a series of diluted RNA standards was prepared and used as experimental templates. These procedures are technically complex, labor-intensive, and require substantial financial investment (
8,
22). Moreover, sensitivity comparisons are unreliable because different procedures used by different laboratories were applied to prepare IAV RNA standards for sensitivity studies (
8,
9). In this study, we used commercial IAV RNA standards for subtypes H1N1 and H3N2, with copy numbers determined by the supplier, allowing easy comparison and accurate assessment of the sensitivity of H1N1 and H3N2 RT-LAMP assays designed by different laboratories. Additionally, the use of commercial RNA standards quantified by digital droplet PCR yielded robust and reproducible data for sensitivity evaluation, enabling direct comparability with existing diagnostic platforms (
21).
Although the LAMP primers used in this study were adopted from previously validated designs targeting conserved regions of IAV, the amplification results obtained here were inconsistent with those reported in earlier studies. A key distinction lies in the optimization of reaction conditions. Previous studies systematically optimized both temperature and magnesium ion concentrations, identifying specific values, such as 63°C and 8 mM, that maximized amplification efficiency, while also noting that higher Mg
2+ levels could inhibit amplification or cause false-positive results (
10). In contrast, our protocol applied a fixed temperature of 65°C without iterative optimization of ionic components, which may have limited reaction efficiency. Furthermore, the inclusion of guanidine hydrochloride (GdmCl) in some studies significantly enhanced detection sensitivity, particularly at lower template concentrations, whereas our assay followed standard buffer conditions without such enhancers (
13). The order of reagent assembly has also been shown to influence LAMP performance and reduce primer-dimer formation; however, this variable was not examined in our experiments (
12). Additionally, different sample preparation strategies may contribute to variation in amplification outcomes. For instance, heat lysis methods used elsewhere may have facilitated more efficient RNA release from viral particles, whereas our use of certified RNA standards diluted in a commercial buffer may have introduced inhibitory effects that were not mitigated by further optimization (
15). Collectively, these differences in experimental parameters, rather than the primer sequences themselves, likely contributed to the inconsistent amplification observed in our study (
8,
9,
23).
5.1. Study Limitations
This study has certain limitations. First, this study represents the analytical evaluation phase of assay development. Although we established preliminary analytical sensitivity values of 67 and 42 copies per reaction for H1N1 and H3N2, respectively, and analytical specificity against a panel of respiratory pathogens, clinical validation remains to be completed. Future studies should evaluate the performance of the assay using respiratory clinical specimens (
8). Second, the analytical sensitivity values of 67 copies for H1N1 and 42 copies for H3N2 represent preliminary limits of detection based on triplicate testing of reference RNA. Final limit-of-detection confirmation following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines would require testing 20 - 60 replicates at these concentrations across multiple runs to establish a 95% detection probability. Third, the assay targets the conserved matrix protein gene and uses SYBR Green for detection; therefore, any IAV subtype present will generate a positive signal, and the assay cannot provide subtyping information without additional subtype-specific assays. Finally, because amplification curves are presented in the RT-LAMP assay, detailed quantitative analysis of kinetic parameters, such as time-to-positivity values, and comprehensive reproducibility metrics were not the primary focus of this analytical evaluation. Future studies will prioritize a more in-depth characterization of these kinetic aspects.