Among the 100 participants, HIV-1 infection was more common in males (51%) than in females (26%) and transgender individuals (23%). A previous study conducted in Pakistan reported similar findings, with a higher frequency of HIV-1 infection among males (63.3%) than among females (26.6%) and transgender individuals (10.1%) (
7,
8). Similar results were reported in a study conducted in Lahore, Pakistan, in 2023 (
9). In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa shows a higher burden among young women, with UNAIDS reporting that 4 in 5 new infections occur in girls; similar female predominance has been observed in Nigeria (
10,
11). In this study, most patients (42%) were 20 - 30 years old, consistent with a study conducted in Karachi that reported a similar age distribution (32% aged 21 - 30 years) (
12).
In the current study, a high viral load (> 100,001 copies/mL) was observed in 68% of patients, and 75% had CD4 cell counts < 500 cells/µL. Mild to moderate immunodeficiency was observed in 46% of patients, whereas 29% had severe immunodeficiency. These findings align with a 2023 study from Pakistan that reported a high viral load in 55% of cases, along with mild to moderate immunodeficiency in 39% and severe immunodeficiency in 33% (
9). These results are also consistent with a 2018 French study showing similar trends (
13).
In this study, hepatitis C virus coinfection (35%) was more frequent than hepatitis B virus coinfection (26%). Only 1 participant had a triple infection involving HIV-1, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and tuberculosis. A previous study from Iran in 2020 reported similar findings (
14). However, contradictory findings were reported from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2021, where the rate of coinfection with hepatitis B virus was higher than that with hepatitis C virus, and no cases of triple infection were reported (
15). In the present study, all clinical and laboratory variables, including treatment status (naive and antiretroviral therapy), coinfections (hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and tuberculosis), CD4 cell counts, and viral load, were used only as descriptive clinical variables.
In the current study, subtype A1 was the most prevalent subtype, whereas only 1 patient had subtype F1. A study conducted in Larkana in 2023 reported subtype A1 (68%) as the dominant subtype in Pakistan (
16). A study from Karachi also identified subtype A1 as the only circulating subtype (
17), whereas research from Islamabad reported subtype A1 in 90.1% of cases and subtype B in 9.9% (
3). In contrast, another study from Punjab found CRF02
AG to be the predominant subtype (77%), followed by subtypes G and A (11% each) (
18). Subtype F1 has not previously been reported in Pakistan. However, subtype F1 has been reported in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Italy, Romania, Russia, and Spain (
19).
In the current study, phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that subtype A1 sequences clustered with previously reported regional and international strains. However, geographic relatedness was inferred on the basis of sequence similarity and supported clustering rather than confirmed transmission linkage. Although some sequences showed proximity to strains reported from Pakistan and East Africa, bootstrap-supported clustering (≥ 70%) was used as the threshold for meaningful phylogenetic interpretation. Clusters with lower support were interpreted cautiously and were not used to infer epidemiological origin or transmission pathways. A previous study conducted in Russia in 2019 reported similar findings (
20). Consistent findings were also reported in Pakistan in 2021, where subtype A1 and circulating strains in Uganda were closely related (
21). In 2022, 2 studies conducted in Pakistan reported the A1 subtype as the dominant subtype in East Africa and the former Soviet Union (
12,
17).
Although the identification of subtype F1 in this study is a notable finding, it should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than evidence of a nationwide shift in HIV-1 subtype patterns, given the small sample size, single-region sampling, and uneven subtype distribution. Multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings and improve understanding of the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes in Pakistan. Because the current study was designed to provide a molecular epidemiological description of HIV-1 subtype distribution, no inferential statistical analyses were performed. Comparative and association analyses were not statistically suitable because of the predominance of a single subtype (A1).
5.1. Conclusions
In this study, A1 was the prevalent HIV-1 subtype in the sampled population of Punjab, whereas subtype F1 was identified in only 1 patient. These findings provide an overview of local HIV-1 diversity. The reclassification of 1 sample from subtype B to F1 after sequencing highlights the importance of sequence-based approaches for accurate HIV-1 subtype identification.
5.2. Limitations
This study had several limitations, including localized single-region sampling, a limited sample size, dominance of 1 subtype (A1), and limited sequencing of samples, which restricted the capacity for broader epidemiological inference. Therefore, the findings are descriptive rather than inferential.
5.3. Future Directions
To map HIV-1 subtype distribution, a multicenter sampling approach should be used across Pakistan. Phylogenetic and epidemiological understanding would be improved by larger sample sizes and comprehensive sequencing. Longitudinal study designs should be used to monitor changes in circulating strains over time.