Aspergillosis is causing a high mortality rate among the human beings. The accurate diagnosis in biological samples is considered a crucial step presumably not to rely on direct routes or depending mainly upon Microbiological techniques (
4,
13).
A. fumigatus was the fungus used in the current study where it was mainly considered responsible for Aspergillosis (
3,
4). Several studies confirm the difficulty of clinical and surgical diagnosis in several patients suffering from aspergillosis. This led to increase the interest in the laboratory methods to diagnose and identify the fungus in biological samples (
14,
15). The results indicated that using synthetic culture media such as PDA to culture biological samples resulted in availability of
A. fumigatus detection starting on the seventh day (as in blood samples and swabs of lung fluids), but it was unable to detect the fungus in lung tissue and nasal fluid samples in the same period. Results revealed that the best period for fungus detection in biological samples was during the third and fourth weeks, which were considered too late especially in the diseased cases.
Results also showed that the highest available rate of diagnosis by microbiological technique was 45% which means that more than half of the samples had negative results in spite of the presence of fungus within the host body. It was also shown that nature of the sample taken from host body was considered as an effective factor in the diagnosis process. Although blood samples and body fluid swabs exhibited the presence of the fungus compared with the other samples (lung tissue and nasal fluid swabs), the rate of positive samples was so low (9%). It was clearly shown that lung samples were most appropriate when compared with the other types of samples.
The current study emphasized that the best methods to diagnose fungus was to take many replicates from different organs of the host body. It should be considered that although these techniques are much easier and less costly with little experience, they require more additional time for incubation period which would be one week, and then the microbiological and microscopic features of the fungus could be studied. This would lessen the dependence on such techniques especially in critical cases. McClenny reported that in spite of using molecular and immunological techniques as quick and best methods to diagnose aspergillosis, the traditional methods which depend on microbiologic and microscopic characteristics remained as major methodologies to let technicians get acquainted with their operational procedures (
16).
Results of the present study ascertained that the enzymatic immunological methods are suitable to detect fungus causing aspergillosis in immunosuppressed rats. This observation is consistent with those of Patterson et al. and Odabasi et al. who confirmed that ELISA, depending on the detection of galactomannan in the blood samples of leukemia patients, was much more accurate and confident (14, 17). Although ELISA was able to diagnose early infection, however the rate of positive samples was low (18%), and up to the seventh day, more than half of the samples had negative results. However, it reached the highest percentage (72%) during the second week, and then it started to decline until it reached its lowest level in the sixth week.
Immunological inspection for the compound 1,3 β-D-glucan was considered complementary to ELISA even though it was generally unspecific to detect fungi infection (
17). The molecular methods depending on PCR technique were considered promising applicable methods. The results indicated that lightCycler-based PCR was highly efficient to diagnose the
A. fumigatus in the blood of immunosuppressed rats where more than half of samples had positive results on the fifth day, and in the first week the rate of samples reached 72% and increased to 90% on the second week. The number of positive samples started to decline after the second week, it was also true when ELISA was used; this may indicate that rats started to recover and restored activities of immune system and resisted the fungus till complete recovery.
The present study concluded that LightCycler-based PCR is one of the high efficient and effective methods to diagnose A. fumigatus that causes aspergillosis in immunosuppressed rats. However, ELISA is required for an early diagnosis. Although isolation and microbiological techniques are less efficient and require considerable time, they are reliable and could be achieved easily; moreover, it is preferable to take samples from different organs of the host’s body. The current study recommended the application of these combined methods whenever facilities are available to get accurate and ascertained detection. In the case of non-availability of ELISA and PCR techniques it is preferable to use isolation methods for samples of blood, lung fluid, nasal fluids, and lung tissue cultured in appropriate media for identification of fungus causing aspergillosis.