Demodex is the most common mite in humans, and there are various opinions about its pathogenicity (
2,
3).
Demodex infection can be transmitted directly by close contact with the infected people. In addition, it can be transmitted indirectly by contaminated towels, combs, blankets, and bath sponge and night clothes (
5).
There are various studies about the epidemiology of the parasite. Of these in the studies about the incidence of
D. folliculorum and
D. brevis in female patients; Roihu et al. (
11) 30%, Baysal et al. (
12) 67% (11.9%), Aycan et al. (
13) 49.6%, Nutting et al. (
14) 80%, Yagdiran et al. (
15) 56.3%, Kemal et al. (
16) 24.1%, Moravvej et al. (
17) 40.8%, Georgala et al. (
18) 71.7% and, Hu and Wang (
19) 48.7% mite positivity have determined. On the other hand, the researchers have reported that there is no significant difference between the sexes in the percentage incidence of the parasite. In the study, 669 women were examined in terms of
Demodex positivity and 39.2% of parasites were detected. Although this positivity rate was similar to other studies, all of the study group was consisted of healthy women.
In the studies on healthy students, the author and colleagues (
20) carried out investigation on 75 females, 96 males, a total of 171 healthy university students between 19 and 30 years old in terms of
Demodex spp. using the cellophane tape method and found positivity (2.9%) in 5 of 96 male students. Again, Zhao et al. (
21) investigated
Demodex positivity in 756 students between the ages of 13 - 22. The researchers compared
Demodex positivity with socio-demographic characteristics. In conclusion, they have reported that there is no significant relationship between gender, place of residence, plumbing, daily face care and using facial cleanser. However, the researchers have found a significant relationship between age, type of skin and skin disorders with the incidence of
Demodex in the same study. Ding et al. (
22) examined the secretion of the external auditory canal of 613 high school students and found
Demodex in 11.58% of them. In this study, the rate was found as 39.2% in the healthy women aged 20 years and over. Again, the
Demodex positivity in 40-49-year old people was found higher than the other age groups (45.6%). However, no significant relationship was detected in chi-square analysis. This situation may be due to the methods used and the selected age group.
Clinically significant symptoms have been detected in the studies on the patients with
Demodex positive. According to the researchers, the causes of this condition were that the importance of density in the pathogenicity of the
Demodex, (
23). In the accessible source information, Zhao et al. (
23) found 43% of positivity in 860 patients who diagnosed with
Demodex dermatitis. Researchers found a significant relationship between rosacea, steroid-induced dermatitis, seborrhoeic dermatitis and primary and irritation with
Demodex positivity. Similarly, Yucel and Yilmaz (
24) found parasite in patients with rosacea as 60.7%. Ozcelik et al. (
25) found parasite in 6 patients with chronic renal failure. Researchers have reported that the
Demodex may be a factor in eye diseases such as blepharitis. However, Karaman et al. (
26) have reported that parasites can be seen on hair skin in pathological conditions and it may play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Firat et al. (
27) found 74.7% of the parasite between health care workers without any complaints. In the study, the epidemiology of the parasite has been identified in healthy women in the province of Malatya.
Different methods have been used in the studies. In diagnosis, many methods are used such as object slide with cellophane, skin samples, punch biopsy and Standart Skin Surface Biopsy (SSSB). In order to determine the pathogenicity of parasite, measuring the mite density in cm
2 is important. In the studies it has been reported that SSSB is an effective method for determining the mite density in cm
2 (
21). Standart skin surface biopsy (SSSB) method is used in the study, which is effective in the diagnosis of parasite.
The SSSB method which is reported to be effective in the diagnosis of parasite has been used in the study. In the analysis of chi-square, no significant relationship was found between the incidence of the parasite, age, education level, occupation, marital status, family type and MetS. However, there was a significant relationship between diastolic pressure and those who fed with fatty foods and the incidence of the parasite.
According to the results of the present study, the MetS has no effect on the frequency of occurrence of the parasite, however; weight, fatty foods, and high diastolic pressure are associated with the frequency of occurrence of the parasite. The effects of these factors to the frequency of occurrence of the parasite should be supported by further study designs.