Temperature and light intensity are both important environmental factors here, and studies found that temperature plays a more important role in growth rate than pH level (
22). In this study, a temperature of 22°C had significant effects on
D. salina growth. However, some reports indicated that 30°C was the most optimal growth temperature (
7,
25,
26). The results of this study were consistent with some reports that suggested that 22 or 25°C were most suitable for
D. salina growth (
15,
27,
28). The three strains in this study were selected and maintained at 20°C. Borowitzka et al. (
29) have suggested that
D. salina grew better than the other organisms because of its strong adaptability in stressed environments (
4). Hence, long-periods of environmental adaptability could have changed some of the living habits of
D. salina. Results of this study also showed that 135.3 μmol m
-2 s
-1 was the optimal light intensity for algae growth, and that lower or higher light intensity could restrain algae growth.
The ionization balance of the medium was determined as follows: HCO
3- → OH
-+CO
2. All
D. salina are strictly photoautotrophs and able to uptake CO
2; the HCO
3- can be converted to CO
2 by extracellular carbonic anhydrase (
15). Due to rapid cell division and growth during the cultivation period, algae consumed amounts of CO
2 that promoted high concentrations of OH
-, resulting in an increased pH value. However, the pH value declined with continued cultivation over several. This result could be attributed to the large amounts of beta-carotene accumulation and some acidic chemicals secreted by algae cells, as well as the neutralized parts of the alkaloid chemicals (
30).
Higher light intensity applied to each single cell with lower density in the early cultivation stage lead to higher levels of beta-carotene accumulation (
27). High light intensity can hurt cellular development and restrain algae growth; therefore, the photosynthetic mechanism of
D. salina was activated in order to produce larger amounts of beta-carotene, one of most important protective pigments located between the thylakoids and stored in neutral lipid droplets, effectively capable of filtering the abundant harmful light (
27). Hence, high light intensity was suitable for beta-carotene biosynthesis but was disadvantageous to algae growth (
5,
31). The orthogonal analysis of pigment accumulation and growth showed that
D. salina growth depended on certain concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. However, current research on optimal nitrogen concentrations for algae growth had variable results, e.g. suitable nitrogen concentration (N) was N = 10 mM (
4,
16) or N = 5 mM (
17), both of which are consistent with the results of this study. However, some reports have claimed that growth under lower nitrogen concentrations (N = 0.75 or N = 1 mM) also performed well (
14,
16).
CO(NH
2)
2 was more effective in promoting algae growth and KNO3 was most suitable for beta-carotene accumulation. Carbon was also important for algae growth and beta-carotene accumulation (
16). Because the alga constantly utilizes HCO
3- and uptakes CO
2, the concentration of HCO
3- decreased and the CO3
2- concentration increased, which further induced the precipitation of other ions (Ca
2+ and Mg
2+) (
14,
32). Hence, high concentrations of NaHCO
3 (1.5 g L
-1) in this study were optimal for algae growth. However, the effects of NaHCO
3 on beta-carotene accumulation were not significant. It could be explained that the algae cells can synthetize a series of chemicals under the suitable concentrations of nitrogen and carbon in order to maintain normal metabolic development. In the absence of nitrogen, the amounts of carbon and hydrogen will participate in non-nitrogen-induced pigment synthesis and initiate beta-carotene accumulation. Hence, the effects of nitrogen on beta-carotene accumulation were stronger than those of NaHCO
3 (
5,
14,
31).
According to results of this study, under the temperature and light intensity of 22°C and 245.6 μmol m-2 s-1, biomass and beta-carotene were simultaneously able to reach a high yield. Moreover, according to algal productivity in this study (0.11 g beta-carotene L-1 and 1.25 g biomass L-1 respectively), yields of one production period could be upwards of 29.7 kg pure β-carotene and 337.5 kg D. salina powder within 1000 m2 of a working area (valid working volume is 30 m × 30 m × 0.3 m). This yield is still lower than the intensive cultivation model. However, nutritional or environmental factors could be further optimized based on the results of this study in order to obtain higher yields. The commercial algal production plant was in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, where most of the area is saline-alkali, with annual temperatures ranging between 22 - 33°C and 2800 hours of sunlight, suitable for algae cultivation. The most suitable commercial algal cultivation models in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand were small-scale outdoor race-way pond cultivation and intensive indoor cultivation. The significance of this study is that the results could be used in future intensive commercial cultivation projects and provide scientific guidance for future extensive commercial cultivation. The experimental strains were new and isolated from saline soil in the domestic area. Furthermore, experimental factors surrounding the design and cultivation environments were simulated to be as similar to actual conditions as possible. Hence, this research may have expansive value and application.