1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Collection of Plant Samples
3.2. Isolation of Endophytic Fungi
3.3. Cultivation and Extraction of Fungal Metabolites
3.4. Biological Screening
3.4.1. Antibacterial Assay
3.4.2. Antifungal Assay
3.5. Molecular Characterization of the Selected Fungal Isolate
3.6. Antioxidant Assay
3.7. Optimization of Media and Culture Conditions
3.7.1. Media Selection
3.7.2. Optimization of Operational Parameters
3.7.3. Optimization of Additional Salts
3.8. Production, Extraction, and Fractionation of the Bioactive Metabolites Under Optimized Conditions
4. Results
4.1. Isolation, Screening, and Preliminary Identification of Endophytic Fungi
| Fungal Strain | Antibacterial Activity: Zone of Inhibition ± SD (Homogenous Group Based on LSD at P<0.05) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.aureus | E.coli | M.luteus | P.aeruginosa | |
| NF12 | 0.0 ± 0.0(d) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) |
| NF13 | 0.0 ± 0.0(d) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) |
| NF14 | 13.9 ± 1.2(b) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 9.8 ± 0.6(b) |
| NF15 | 15.1 ± 1.4(b) | 9.4 ± 0.5(b) | 9.5 ± 0.3(b) | 14.3 ± 0.6(a) |
| NF16 | 10.1 ± 0.5(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 9.5 ± 0.3(b) |
| NF17 | 0.0 ± 0.0(d) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) |
| Tetracycline 30µg/well | 20.1 ± 1.0(a) | 21.2 ± 1.6(a) | 22.3 ± 1.6(a) | 14.5 ± 2.1(a) |
| DMSO | 0.0 ± 0.0(d) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) | 0.0 ± 0.0(c) |
Abbrviations: DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; LSD, least significant difference; SD, standard deviation.
aThe values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation among triplicate experiments. Values followed by the same alphabetic letter do not differ significantly at a 95% probability (P < 0.05).
| Fungal Strain | Antifungal Activity: Zone of Inhibition ± SD (Homogenous Group Based on LSD at P < 0.05) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A. niger | A. terreus | C. albicans | |
| NF12 | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (d) |
| NF13 | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (d) |
| NF14 | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 9.9 ± 0.3 (c) |
| NF15 | 9.8 ± 0.3 (b) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 14.2 ± 0.5 (b) |
| NF16 | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 9.7 ± 0.4 (c) |
| NF17 | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (d) |
| Nystatin 10 µg/well | 24.2 ± 1.6 (a) | 21.5 ± 1.0 (a) | 19.5 ± 1.2 (a) |
| DMSO | 0.0 ± 0.0 (c) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (b) | 0.0 ± 0.0 (d) |
Abbrviations: LSD, least significant difference; SD, standard deviation.
aThe values are represented as the mean±standard deviation among triplicate experiments. The values followed by the same alphabetic letter do not differ significantly at a 95% probability (P < 0.05).
4.2. Molecular Characterization of Fungal Isolate NF15
The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method, based on the Tamura-Nei model [1]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-2629.5593) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying neighbor-joining and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with the superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 13 nucleotide sequences. The included codon positions were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 318 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [2].
4.3. Optimization of Culture Conditions for NF15
4.3.1. Effect of Incubation Time
A, effect of incubation time in days, B, effect of agitation speed (rpm) of the shaking incubator during the incubation period, C, effect of the pH of the production medium, and D, effect of incubation temperature (°C) at four different levels. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the values are represented as the mean of three observations. The error bars indicate the standard deviation among treatments. The bars tagged with same alphabetic letter do not differ significantly at a 95% confidence level, while letters followed by the asterisk symbol (*) denote significantly higher values (P < 0.05).
4.3.2. Effect of Agitation Speed
4.3.3. Effect of pH
4.3.4. Effect of Temperature
4.3.5. Effect of Cultivation Media and Salts
A, Effect of growth media on the growth and production of antimicrobial metabolites from endophytic fungal isolate NF15. The error bars indicate the standard deviation among the treatments. The bars tagged with the same alphabetic letter do not differ significantly at a 95% confidence level, while the letters followed by the asterisk symbol (*) denote significantly higher values (P < 0.05). B - D, Effect of different salts at varying concentrations on the growth and production of antimicrobial metabolites from endophytic fungal isolate NF15. B, Effect of NaCl, C, effect of KH2PO4, and D, effect of KNO3. The error bars indicate the standard deviation among treatments. The bars tagged with the same alphabetic letter do not differ significantly at a 95% confidence level, while the letters followed by the asterisk symbol (*) denote significantly higher values (P < 0.05).
4.4. Biological Screening
4.4.1. Antimicrobial Assays
4.4.2. Antioxidant Assay
| Reaction Time, min | At 5 µg/mL | At 10 µg/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O.D.517 nm | RSA, % | O.D.517 nm | RSA, % | |
| 0 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | - | 0.93 ± 0.05 | - |
| 10 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 67.0 ± 2.35 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 77.0 ± 2.85 |
| 30 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 74.1 ± 3.74 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 79.0 ± 3.95 |


![Phylogenetic Tree Showing Evolutionary Relationship of <i>Chaetomium </i>sp. NF15 The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method, based on the Tamura-Nei model [1]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-2629.5593) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying neighbor-joining and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with the superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 13 nucleotide sequences. The included codon positions were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 318 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [2].](https://brieflands.com/journals/jjm/articles/56615/figures/jjm-9-6-29978-i003-preview.webp)


