According to this study, prevalence of nasal colonization with
S. aureus among one-month to fourteen-year-old children was 26.3%. In a survey by Tabbarai et al. (
19) on 1193 school-aged children, prevalence of nasal carriage was 16.3%, out of which 34.8% were MRSA, while peak age of nasal carriage was 6-12 years old and vancomycin resistance rate was 1.7%. Ciftci et al. (
7) in Turkey worked on four to six-year-old children and reported 28.4% for the prevalence of nasal colonization which was consistent with our investigation. In Taiwan, prevalence of nasal colonization among two to 60-month-old children was 23.2% of which MRSA was present in 7.8% of cases and peak age of MRSA was two to six months old. Furthermore, day care attendance and family size were risk factors for MRSA nasal carriage (
20).
In our study, MRSA carriage was more than that of the Taiwanese report but risk factors were comparable. Other studies have reported the prevalence of nasal
S. aureus colonization as 32.1% in South Korea, 40% in Tanzania and 18.1% in USA (
5,
6,
21), which were inconsistent with our study. The different in prevalence of nasal carriage between our study and others may be due to the various age groups studied. For example, two different surveys carried our during 2009 and 2010 in India, reported that nasal carriage among 5-15 and 1-5 year-old children was 52.3% and 6.3%, respectively (
8,
17). Furthermore, other characteristics such as socioeconomic status were not determined in these studies.
In the present study, MRSA prevalence among positive nasal cultures was 35.9%, which was compatible with the study by Tabbarai et al. (
19) (34.8%). In other investigations, MRSA prevalence among healthy
S. aureus nasal carriers varied from 0.3% (
7) to 18.9% (
6) that was significantly lower than our survey. Furthermore, even in societies with prevalence of 40% and 52.3% for nasal colonization, MRSA prevalence has been reported as 10.5% and 3.89%, respectively (
5,
8). In the present study, the highest susceptibility of MRSA was towards vancomycin and the least sensitivity was towards cephalothin. Huang et al. (
20) detected no MRSA resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin while 99.1% resistance to penicillin and 9% sensitivity to clindamycin (54.5% in our study) was reported. Concordant results have been reported by some researches (
6,
17) yet MRSA clindamycin susceptibility in the investigation of ko et al. (
6) was 61.1% which was more than our study and other mentioned reports. In this study, prevalence of vancomycin sensitive MRSA was 87.9%, while in other studies this was reported as 100% (
6,
17,
20).
Comparison of the present research with previous studies indicates more judicious antibiotic prescription is needed for children. Although the vast majority of children with community acquired MRSA nasal colonization are self-limited during a one-year period (
22), some of them are at risk of recurrent skin and soft tissue infections thus decolonization of these cases is recommended (
23-
25). Furthermore, with regards to the high prevalence of nasal carriage of MRSA in our investigation, decolonization of healthy preschool children is prudent.
This study revealed that male gender, antibiotic use and hospitalization during the past three months, number of individuals in the family being more that four, age group of less than four years, parental smoking and sleeping with parent were associated risk factors for MRSA nasal carriage among healthy children. A few researches have been conducted regarding the risk factors of MRSA nasal carriage among healthy children. Fritz et al. (
22,
23) identified some risk factors for nasal carriage of MRSA in healthy children that included outpatient visit in the past six months, surgery during the previous one year, history of immune deficiency and systemic infections, more than two people per bedroom (crowded home), a household member working at a health care center, a household member aged 19 to 27 years old or more than 60 years old and daycare attendance. Furthermore, the relationship with close contacts such as sharing a bath towel with MRSA nasal carriage was ruled out (
26) which appeared incompatible with our findings (close contact via sleeping with parents was associated with MRSA nasal colonization). Some studies have claimed that the household member who works at a hospital is the only risk factor for nasal MRSA carriage (
27,
28). Pathak et al. (
17) concluded that a large family size was associated with
S. aureus nasal carriage but recent hospitalization was not. Oppositely, we found that large family size and recent admission were risk factors of carriage.
Our study has some limitations, firstly, it was cross-sectional and didn't differentiate persistent from transient nasal colonization, thus obtaining another nasal culture after one year (cohort design) is recommended to detect persistent carriage over time, which is a major source of community infections. Secondly, it is possible that the isolated strains are not representative of the community and investigations with larger sample sizes are needed in the future. Thirdly, the family socioeconomic status was not evaluated in our research and it would be better to consider this in future studies. Fourthly, we did not confirm MRSA by mecA genes and also didn't find a Vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) gene, thus more investigations in this field are imperative. Lastly, the impact of seasonal changes on S. aureus nasal colonization was not evaluated in our study, thus further studies are recommended.
In conclusion, in the present study the prevalence of nasal S. aureus colonization was 26.3% out of which 35.9% were MRSA. Furthermore, male sex, antibiotic use and admission in the past three months, crowded family, parental smoking and sleeping with parents were factors associated with MRSA nasal carriage.