Candidiasis is an infection with a wide scope of symptoms ranging from mild dermatosis to systemic infection with high mortality rate (
1,
2). The yeasts belonging to the genus
Candida are considered as the most frequent fungi isolated from cancer patients (
3), the second cause of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, the third pathogenic organisms responsible for pediatrics sepsis (
4,
5), and finally, the fourth cause of hospital-acquired fungemia with distinguished mortality rate (
6). Recently, a significant switching in the type of the isolated species to non-
albicans has been found (
7,
8). Although
Candida albicans is still isolated from clinical specimens as the main species, frequency of non-
albicans species has considerably increased (
7,
9,
10). At the same time, emerge of resistance of
Candida species, in particular non-
albicans isolates, to current antifungal drugs, is another current universal crisis (
10-
12). These resistant strains, especially among non-
albicans species, increase treatment failure and risk of mortality. Also, they may be associated with patients’ prolonged hospital stays and sometimes, contribute to further complications (
13). Several factors, including human practices, either overuse or abuse of antibiotics, and increase in the population of immune compromised patients, may contribute to the rise of this problem (
13). Therefore, the first step to overcome antifungal resistance is tracking the resistance data locally.
In such regard, the two well-recognized standard antifungal susceptibility methods are those recommended by the clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI) and the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST) (
14-
16), but differ from one another in inoculation density and glucose content of the base media (
14-
18). Reading the plates and interpreting the results are major problems on the way to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by these methods. An important issue in the interpretation of the MIC results is a phenomenon known as trailing effect, which is the reduced but persistent growth of yeasts through the serial micro-dilution method (
19). This phenomenon could complicate the interpretation of the results. Also, its frequency might be underestimated as it might be ignored while reading the plates (
19). Although the precise cause of this effect is far from being fully understood, a number of studies have proposed that up-regulation of some genes involved in the resistance to azole drugs, such those encoding lanosterol demethylase (ERG11), squalene epoxidase (ERG1) or efflux transporters, might have a role (
20). Moreover, some authors have reported that the inoculum size (
21), the incubation temperature (
22), and strain-molecular characteristics (
23) might also be involved. Others have reported adding glucose to RPMI (
24) or adjustment of the medium pH ≤ 5 might suppress the trailing effect (
25). Although the determination of MIC might be complicated by the trailing effect, it does not indicate clinical resistance. Based on a murine model (
26), the isolates exhibiting the trailing effect in vitro, should be classed as susceptible strains in vivo. Moreover, it has been previously shown that oropharyngeal candidiasis caused by trailing isolates respond well to a low dose of fluconazole (
27). In the present study, we examined the in vitro activity of azole drugs against clinical isolates of
Candida species by broth micro-dilution. The frequency of trailing effect in this method was examined, as well.