The emergence of carbapenem resistance in
Enterobacteriaceae has become a substantial clinical problem, since carbapenemase production cannot be easily inferred from the antimicrobial resistance profiles, thus, dissemination of these enzymes among nosocomial pathogens (e.g.,
Enterobacteriaceae) is a threat to public health and must be closely monitored (phenotypic and genotypic tests). In addition, delay in detection of multidrug-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae results in longer hospitalizations and increased healthcare costs (
26).
Recently, multiplex PCR assays for the detection of
blaIMP,
blaVIM,
blaOXA,
blaNDM and
blaKPC have been described (
25-
30). Unfortunately, the primers used had lower detection ranges (many homologs are missed). For example, the multiplex PCR assay described by Kaase et al. (
29) targeted VIM and IMP enzymes, among other carbapenemases, and allowed the detection of 22 variants of IMP (IMP-1 to IMP-22) and 13 variants of VIM (VIM-1 to VIM-13). However, according to the Lahey Clinic website, to this day over 41 IMP and 39 VIM derivatives have been documented. This suggests that specificity of those primers may be impaired due to sequence variations. Nijhuis et al. (
30) targeted IMP, OXA-48-like types (OXA-48, 162, 163, 181, 204, 232, 244, 245, 370) and other carbapenemase genes. The assay reported in this study allowed the detection of 33.3% of IMP variants (14/42) and was not able to detect OXA-23 and OXA-247.
This study shows that primers in two multiplex PCRs are able to detect of KPC, VIM, NDM-1, OXA (OXA-23-like and OXA-48-like enzymes) and IMP variants (except IMP-3, IMP-16, IMP-27, IMP-31, IMP-34 and IMP-35) present in
Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates. Due to the success of the first primer sets, the additional untested sets (
Table 1) are predicted to detect the remaining NDM- and IMP-type enzymes and other carbapenemases. Therefore, the combination of primer sets presented in this study will cover all known carbapenemase genes found in
Enterobacteriaceae.
The multiplex PCR assay described in this study is a fast, low-cost, efficient and accurate test for rapid screening of
Enterobacteriaceae isolates with respect to drug resistant genes for
blaKPC,
blaVIM,blaIMP,
blaNDM and
blaOXA and cover 100% (19/19), 100% (39/39), 85.7% (36/42), 9.1% (1/11) and 8.5% (25/293) of the genes described in the Lahey database, respectively. The proposed untested primers may be also used for detection of the remaining carbapenemases in single and/or multiplex PCR reactions (
Table 1). The resulting assays could collectively cover 92.9% (39/42), 100% (11/11), 100% (5/5), 100% (4/4), 95.8% (23/24) and 52.6% (154/293) of the
blaIMP,
blaNDM,
blaSME,
blaIMI,
blaGES,
blaOXA and other genes, respectively.
We included here all known carbapenemase genes that have been identified in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (blaKPC, blaOXA,blaVIM, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaSME, blaIMI, blaGES, blaGIM, blaDIM and blaCMY). In conclusion, primers tested in silico and in vitro may be used in single and/or multiplex PCR for screening encountered carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, as well as for monitoring their emergence and spread (e.g., outbreaks).