This study evaluated reproductive and clinical outcomes following hysteroscopic myomectomy in women with submucosal fibroids. Among 44 infertile patients, 28 (63.6%) achieved pregnancy after the procedure; 13.64% conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) and 50% conceived spontaneously. These findings indicate that hysteroscopic myomectomy can significantly improve fertility in appropriately selected patients.
Our pregnancy rate is comparable to previous reports. Fonge et al. observed that 22.6% of women conceived using ART after hysteroscopic myomectomy (
15), and Litta et al. reported an overall pregnancy rate of 85.8% (
16). In contrast, Yu et al. reported a lower pregnancy rate of 25% (
17). The lower rate in that study was attributed to possible endometrial injury and postoperative intrauterine adhesions, as well as the presence of concomitant infertility factors (
17). Variability in pregnancy outcomes across studies may therefore be explained by differences in patient selection, surgical technique, fibroid size and number, and coexisting infertility causes. Removal of submucosal fibroids likely improves fertility by restoring normal endometrial architecture, enhancing implantation, and reducing inflammatory and mechanical interference with embryo implantation. Clinically, these findings support hysteroscopic myomectomy as a fertility-enhancing procedure before or alongside infertility treatment.
Regarding long-term surgical outcomes, 7.6% of patients underwent repeat myomectomy, suggesting recurrence or incomplete resection, and 10.7% ultimately required total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Fibroid recurrence is well recognized, as new fibroids may develop or residual tissue may remain after the initial surgery. Similar findings have been reported in the literature: Polena et al. reported repeat surgery in 5.1% of patients with incomplete resection (
18), and Derman et al. found that 15.9% of patients required further surgery during 9-year follow-up, while 83.9% did not (
19). These data suggest that hysteroscopic resection provides durable symptom control for most patients but not all. Clinically, this emphasizes the importance of long-term follow-up and counseling patients that, although effective, hysteroscopic myomectomy may not prevent future surgery in every case.
Patient-reported outcomes were also favorable. In our study, 95.4% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. This is consistent with the findings of Polena et al., who reported 93.9% satisfaction (
18), and Hart et al., who reported 71.4% satisfaction at a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (
20). Differences in satisfaction rates likely reflect variations in follow-up duration, symptom severity, and patient expectations. High satisfaction probably results from the minimally invasive nature of hysteroscopic surgery, rapid recovery, and symptom relief. Clinically, these findings reinforce hysteroscopic myomectomy as a patient-acceptable and quality-of-life-improving intervention.
Symptom control further supports the effectiveness of the procedure. In our cohort, 70.6% of patients experienced symptom resolution, whereas 29.4% did not. Similar improvements have been reported previously, including a 94.4% symptom improvement rate in another study (
19). Persistent symptoms may be explained by incomplete fibroid removal, recurrence, adenomyosis, or non-structural causes such as anovulatory bleeding. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) was the most common presenting symptom in our patients, consistent with the findings of Ghahiri et al. (
21). Therefore, hysteroscopic myomectomy is particularly beneficial for patients with AUB due to submucosal fibroids, although evaluation for other etiologies remains necessary when symptoms persist.
The procedure demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Uterine perforation occurred in 0.3% of cases and postoperative fever in 0.3%. Hemorrhage occurred in 1.8% of patients, and only 0.6% required prolonged hospitalization. These rates are within the range reported in the literature, where major complications occur in approximately 1 - 5% of cases and include fluid overload, hemorrhage, and genital tract trauma (
18). Thus, hysteroscopic myomectomy can be considered a safe minimally invasive treatment when performed with appropriate precautions.
Hyponatremia was observed in 13.8% of our patients, using a sodium threshold < 135 mEq/L. The higher rate compared with other reports may be related to differences in diagnostic criteria. However, three patients required treatment with furosemide and hypertonic saline, highlighting the clinical relevance of this complication. Previous reports describe severe cases of hyponatremia following hysteroscopic myomectomy, including a patient who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury after serum sodium decreased to 78 mmol/L (
22), and another case of water intoxication and cardiac arrest requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (
23). These complications are caused by absorption of irrigation fluid during hysteroscopy. Therefore, strict intraoperative fluid monitoring, limiting operative duration, and early correction of electrolyte disturbances are essential preventive strategies. Preferential use of isotonic irrigation solutions, when feasible, may further reduce risk.
Overall, our findings indicate that hysteroscopic myomectomy provides meaningful fertility improvement, effective symptom control, high patient satisfaction, and a low complication rate. The procedure should be considered a first-line uterine-preserving treatment for symptomatic submucosal fibroids, particularly in women desiring fertility, while careful perioperative monitoring and long-term follow-up remain necessary.
4.1. Limitations of This Study
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective design introduces the possibility of selection bias, as only patients with available medical records and successful telephone follow-up were included, and patients lost to follow-up may have had different outcomes. Second, the absence of a control or comparison group prevents causal inference and does not allow direct comparison of hysteroscopic myomectomy with alternative treatments such as medical therapy or other surgical approaches.
In addition, outcome assessment relied partly on patient self-report obtained through telephone interviews, which may be subject to recall bias and misclassification, particularly for symptom resolution and patient satisfaction. Although follow-up extended up to several years, late complications—such as intrauterine adhesions, fibroid recurrence, and delayed need for additional surgery—may have been under-detected because routine imaging or hysteroscopic reevaluation was not performed.
Furthermore, the study population was derived from a single tertiary referral center, which may limit external validity. Heterogeneity in fibroid characteristics (size, number, and FIGO classification) and unmeasured confounders affecting fertility outcomes (e.g., male factor infertility, ovarian reserve, and use of assisted reproductive techniques) also limit interpretation of reproductive results.
Prospective, multicenter studies with standardized postoperative evaluation, objective imaging follow-up, and appropriate comparison groups are required to better determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy.
It is possible that the inclusion criteria for patients with FIGO 1 and 2, but in the hysteroscopy appearance, the myoma had a different FIGO and was included in the study with the hysteroscopy criteria. It was mentioned in the text of manuscript.
4.2. Conclusions
Hysteroscopic myomectomy appears to be an effective and minimally invasive therapeutic option for women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. The procedure was associated with substantial symptom relief and improvement in quality of life, particularly in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic discomfort. In addition, the observed reproductive outcomes suggest a beneficial role in selected infertile patients. Overall, hysteroscopic myomectomy can be considered a valuable fertility-preserving intervention when appropriately indicated.