All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. and used as received without further purification. The ^1H and ^13C NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker AVANCE and a Varian Unity INOVA spectrometer, operating at 500 MHz for ^1H NMR and 126 MHz for ^13C NMR, respectively. Deuterated chloroform CDCl3 was used as the solvent, and the residual solvent peaks were used as the internal standard; δ = 7.27 ppm for ^1H NMR and δ = 77.23 ppm for ^13C NMR. The signal multiplicities were characterized using the standard notation: s singlet, d doublet, t triplet, q quartet, dd doublet of doublets, m multiplet, or br broad, with J-coupling constants measured in hertz Hz. To complement the NMR data, Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry LC-MS analyses were also performed to verify the purity and molecular weight of the compounds. The LC-MS analysis of pure compounds was conducted using a Shimadzu Nexera Lite HPLC system 2050c 3D coupled with an LCMS-2050 mass spectrometer Shimadzu, Japan. For the HPLC separation, an Acclaim™ 120 C8 column 4.6 mm I.D. × 150 mm, particle size 5 µm was employed. A gradient elution method was used, with methanol as the mobile phase, to ensure the effective separation of the compounds before mass spectrometric detection. For the LC-MS analysis, the nebulizing gas flow rate was set to 0.3 L/min, with the drying gas and heating gas flow rates at 6.0 L/min and 7.0 L/min, respectively. The desolvation temperature was maintained at 400°C to enhance solvent evaporation efficiency. Detection was carried out over a mass-to-charge ratio m/z range of 100 - 500, with a scan time of 0.5 seconds per scan, ensuring accurate and efficient analysis of the target compounds. The data were collected in the positive ion mode at a detector voltage of 2.0 kV. Thin-layer chromatography TLC was utilized for monitoring the reactions using pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 sheets Merck as the stationary phase. The developed TLC plates were visualized under ultraviolet light at a wavelength of 254 nm to assess the progress of the reactions. For the purification of synthesized compounds, recrystallization from methanol was carried out to achieve higher purity. Biological assays were performed according to standard methods (
16,
17).
3.1. General Method for the Synthesis of Azo Benzoyl Acetone Derivatives KA 101-104 and Structure Characterization
In the first flask, diazonium salts were prepared by slow addition of 2.5 mL of conc. HCl to 10 mmol of substituted aromatic amines aniline, para-bromoaniline, para-methoxyaniline, and para-nitroaniline, followed by the addition of 5 mL of 15 % NaNO
2 solution at 0°C, and the reaction was stirred for 15 min at 0°C. In the other flask, 10 mmol of benzoyl acetone and 30 mmol of sodium acetate in 20 mL ethanol were stirred for 10 min at room temperature to dissolve. Then, the diazonium salt obtained from the first flask was added to the ice-cold solution of benzoyl acetone in the second flask and stirred for another 10 min at 0°C. The obtained crude product was filtered, washed with alcohol/water solution 9:1, 3 mL, and crystallized in methanol to afford azo compounds. The structure of azo derivatives was characterized using ^1H NMR, ^13C NMR, and mass spectrometry Figures S1 - 4 (
Figure 2).
Synthetic route of the synthesized compounds KA 101-104: KA101 R= Br Yield: 72%, KA102 R= H Yield: 68 %, KA103 R= OCH3 Yield: 61%, KA104 R= NO2 Yield: 44 %.
3.1.1. KA101 [E-2-[4-bromophenyldiazinyl]-1-phenylbutane-1,3-dione]
^1H NMR 500 MHz, CDCl3 δ 14.59 s, 1H, 7.86 d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, 7.63-7.49 m, 1H, 7.49-7.38 m, 3H, 7.26 s, OH, 7.07 d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, 2.62 s, 2H. ^13C NMR 126 MHz, CDCl3 δ 198.68, 192.08, 186.67, 140.90, 138.35, 132.77, 132.73, 132.27, 130.41, 128.51, 128.33, 127.97, 118.39, 117.67, 117.24, 30.56. MS calculated for C16H12O2N2Br [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ yield 345, 347 and 367, 369. Reaction Percentage Yield: 72%.
3.1.2. KA102 [E-1-phenyl-2-phenyldiazenyl butane-1,3-dione]
^1H NMR 500 MHz, CDCl3 δ 14.67 s, 1H, 7.89-7.86 m, 1H, 7.63-7.51 m, 2H, 7.49-7.45 m, 2H, 7.44-7.40 m, 1H, 7.34-7.30 m, 2H, 7.26-7.19 m, 2H, 7.15-7.11 m, 1H, 2.63 s, 3H, 2.58 s, 1H. ^13C NMR 126 MHz, CDCl3 δ 198.53, 192.29, 141.76, 138.63, 132.85, 132.06, 130.45, 129.77, 129.70, 128.46, 128.27, 127.90, 125.67, 116.30, 115.87, 30.58. MS calculated for C16H14O2N2 [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ yield 267, 289. Reaction Percentage Yield: 68 %.
3.1.3. KA103 [E-2-[4-methoxyphenyldiazinyl]-1-phenylbutane-1,3-dione]
^1H NMR 500 MHz, CDCl3 δ 15.26-14.63 m, 1H, 7.91-7.79 m, 1H, 7.66-7.33 m, 3H, 7.16 d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, 6.86 d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H, 3.78 s, 2H, 2.63 s, 2H. ^13C NMR 126 MHz, CDCl3 δ 198.29, 192.34, 157.94, 139.03, 135.31, 132.24, 131.76, 130.35, 127.97, 117.69, 117.35, 100.00, 55.65, 30.52. MS calculated for C17H16O3N2 [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ yield 297, and 319. Reaction Percentage Yield: 61%.
3.2. General Method for the Synthesis of KA5-KA8 and Structure Characterization
To obtain the tri-substituted pyrazole, KA5-KA8, the purified intermediates from the previous reactions KA101-KA104 were refluxed with phenyl hydrazine in ethanol at 80°C for 1 hr using acetic acid as a catalyst to result in precipitate that was filtered and crystallized in methanol, and the two structures were characterized using Liquid Chromatography High Resolution Mass Spectrometry LC/HRMS Figures S5 – 9 (
Figure 3).
Synthetic route of the synthesized compounds KA5-8: KA5 R= Br Yield: 70%, KA6 R= H Yield: 78 %, KA7 R= OCH3 Yield:53 %, KA8 R= NO2 Yield: 59 %.
3.2.1. KA5 [E-4-[4-bromophenyldiazinyl]-5-methyl-1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole]
^1H NMR 400 MHz, DMSO-d6 δ 8.04 d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, 7.73 d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, 7.68 d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H, 7.65 s, 2H, 7.60 d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, 7.55 d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, 7.48 d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, 7.41 d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, 7.37 d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H, 7.30 d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, 2.52 s, 2H. ^13C NMR 101 MHz, DMSO δ 152.22, 152.19, 149.51, 144.44, 141.08, 139.40, 138.74, 135.99, 135.18, 132.90, 132.85, 132.73, 132.40, 130.96, 129.82, 129.63, 129.53, 129.22, 128.98, 128.92, 128.85, 128.71, 128.46, 128.36, 125.83, 125.58, 124.06, 123.98, 123.90, 123.74, 40.61, 40.40, 40.19, 39.98, 39.77, 39.56, 39.36, 15.41, 13.74. MS calculated for C22H17BrN4 is 417.0637 and the two isotopes [M+H]+ are reported. Reaction Percentage Yield: 70%.
3.2.2. KA6 [E-5-methyl-1,3-diphenyl-4-phenyldiazenyl-1H-pyrazole]
^1H NMR 400 MHz, DMSO-d6 δ 7.67 d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, 7.65 d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H, 7.53–7.48 m, 3H, 7.46 t, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H, 7.43 d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, 7.43–7.42 m, 1H, 7.41 d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H, 7.40 d, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H, 7.38 dd, J = 4.3, 2.0 Hz, 2H, 7.32 d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, 7.31 t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H, 2.55 s, 2H. ^13C NMR 101 MHz, DMSO δ 153.33, 144.21, 140.92, 139.49, 135.98, 131.00, 130.63, 129.75, 129.59, 129.56, 128.72, 128.50, 128.45, 125.64, 122.15, 40.62, 40.41, 40.20, 39.99, 39.79, 39.58, 39.37, 15.39. MS calculated for C22H18N4 is 338.1531 and reported as [M+H]+. Reaction Percentage Yield: 78%.
3.2.3. KA7 [E-4-[4-methoxyphenyldiazenyl]-5-methyl-1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole]
^1H NMR 400 MHz, DMSO-d6 δ 8.07–8.05 m, 1H, 7.80–7.77 m, 2H, 7.68 d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H, 7.64 d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, 7.61 d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, 7.56–7.54 m, 1H, 7.50 t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, 7.42 d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, 7.40–7.39 m, 1H, 7.14–7.11 m, 2H, 7.08–7.05 m, 1H, 3.86 s, 2H, 2.61 s, 3H. ^13C NMR 101 MHz, DMSO δ 161.61, 161.46, 148.86, 147.56, 147.54, 143.29, 140.85, 139.59, 137.76, 135.77, 132.71, 132.05, 130.95, 129.83, 129.53, 129.43, 129.08, 128.85, 128.79, 128.68, 128.32, 125.84, 125.57, 123.98, 123.89, 115.05, 114.91, 113.31, 113.30, 109.44, 56.03, 55.98, 40.56, 40.36, 40.15, 39.94, 39.73, 39.52, 39.31, 15.34, 13.61. MS calculated for C22H18N4 is 368.1637 and reported as [M+H]+. Reaction Percentage Yield: 53 %.
3.2.4. KA8 [E-5-methyl-4-[4-nitrophenyldiazenyl]-1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole]
^1H NMR 400 MHz, DMSO-d6 δ 8.41–8.38 m, 2H, 8.35–8.33 m, 1H, 8.03 d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, 7.95–7.93 m, 1H, 7.81 d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, 7.68 d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, 7.63 t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, 7.58–7.56 m, 1H, 7.50 d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, 7.42 d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, 7.32 dd, J = 6.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H, 2.64 s, 3H. ^13C NMR 101 MHz, DMSO δ 156.76, 147.92, 145.76, 141.36, 139.14, 136.57, 130.98, 129.99, 129.68, 129.03, 128.86, 127.91, 125.73, 125.48, 123.00, 40.26, 40.06, 39.85, 39.64, 39.43, 39.22, 39.01, 15.41. MS calculated for C22H18N4 is 383.1382 and reported as [M+H]+. Reaction Percentage Yield: 59%.