Chronic skin diseases such as AD affect the physical appearance and lifestyle of the patients and may lead to learning difficulties, behavioral problems, and cognitive impairment, and have negative impacts on the QoL of the patients (
10,
11,
15). Hence, it is always necessary to develop a standard questionnaire to assess the QoL of the patients (
16-
18). The CDLQI questionnaire specifically evaluates the QoL of children with dermatitis aged 4 to 16 years old (
19,
20). The current study revealed a mean score of 9.44 ± 5.47 that was in agreement with the results of a meta-analysis by Olsen et al. (7.1 - 9.8), representing the moderate effect of AD on the QoL of these patients (
4). Currently, the validity and reliability of this questionnaire are evaluated in different countries with reported Cronbach’s alpha values from 0.82 to 0.92 (
13,
21). Cronbach’s alpha in our study was 0.87, indicating a good internal consistency. In the present study, a one-factor solution with factor loadings from 0.59 to 0.77 was achieved for the items. Only one study by Balc in Turkey analyzed factor loadings using a two-factor solution that led to 0.07 - 0.74 for the first factor and 0.09 - 0.83 for the second factor (
20).
In the majority of the studies, the feelings and educational activates were the most and the least items influenced by AD, respectively (
13). In the present study, the most and the least items affected by AD were itching and sports activities, respectively.
Our research demonstrated no relationship between the QoL and demographic features of the patients that was compatible with the Ganemo study in Sweden (
22). Some surveys showed two peaks of QoL at six and 15 years old and described lower QoL in male children (
21,
23). The current study revealed that patients with more severe disease had lower QoL (Pearson correlation = 0.70) that was compatible with other studies with Pearson correlations between 0.53 and 0.78 (
13,
23).
The mean score of QoL in the present study was 9.44. In one study in Malaysia by Aziah et al., this number was reported to be 10 that indicated a lower QoL in comparison with our study. This difference might be due to the higher severity of the disease in their studies. The mean number of SCORAD in the Aziah study was 36 versus 31.97 in our study. In addition, the maximum severity of the disease in the Aziah study was 83 versus 57.4 in our study (
24).
In the present study, AD had a significant negative effect on the QoL of 65% of the participants (38% with moderate effect, 27% with large effect) that was nearly in accordance with the Amaral study in Brazil, with a significant effect of 72% (38% moderate effect and 34% large effect) (
25). A limitation of this study was the collection of data solely from one pediatric dermatology clinic as a referral center in the southeast of Iran. Therefore, it may include more severe cases that result in the lower QoL of AD children. Thus, further studies are recommended to evaluate the efficacy of treatment modalities on the QoL of patients with a larger number of patients.
5.1. Conclusion
The results of our study proved good reliability and validity of the Persian version of the CDLQI questionnaire with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. Therefore, it can be used in clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of treatment in the QoL of children. Moreover, there was a positive and strong correlation between the QoL scores and the severity of the disease, but there was no relationship between demographic features and QoL of patients with AD.