This cross-sectional study was conducted on 650 students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, located in the west of Iran, during year 2015. The participants were volunteers that were selected by stratified sampling. Initially, 30 questionnaires were randomly assigned to students to calculate reliability, which was 0.86. Stratified sampling method with proportional allocation was performed according to the total number of students in each faculty. Sample size was calculated as 704 subjects based on Lashgarara et al.’s study (
15) with prevalence of 0.34 and type I error equal to 0.05. At the beginning of the study, 704 people were identified as samples, yet after collecting information and excluding incomplete questionnaires, 650 questionnaires (92%) remained with the least missing information for proper analysis.
After obtaining permission from the research council of Hamandan University of Medical Science, written contest was obtained from all students. The data collection tool was a questionnaire including demographic information, such as gender, education level, age, status of residence, and marital status. General Health Assessment Questionnaire (GHQ28) was used to assess the general health of the students (
7). The reliability and validity of the Persian version was approved by Nazifi et al. (2014) (
16). The questionnaire included sub-scales, including the somatic symptoms scale (items 1 to 7), anxiety and sleep disturbance symptoms scale (items 8 to 14), the scale of social functioning (items 15 to 21), and symptoms of depression scale (items 22 to 28). Each question was scored on a Likret scale from 0 to 3; in each subscale scores above 6 and a total score of above 22 indicated a disorder. To assess Internet addiction, the Young Internet Addiction Test was used; the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this scale was investigated by Alavi et al. (2012) (
17). The questionnaire contains 20 items with minimum and maximum scores of 20 and 100, respectively. Scores are classified in three groups, including normal users (scores between 20 and 49), users who are suspected of Internet addiction (scores between 50 and 79), and addicts (scores between 80 and 100).
The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 24. Means (SD), frequencies, and percentages were used to report descriptive characteristics. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity of variances were checked and confirmed for each aspect. Analysis of variance method with Tukey’s post hoc was performed to compare means of different general health aspects in Internet addiction levels. Moreover, binary logistic regression model (0 normal or suspected, 1 addiction) was used to determine the effect of each variable on the risk of internet addiction. P values of < 0.05 were consider significant. The Ethics Committee of Hamedan University of Medical Sciences approved the ethical considerations of the present study under No B/16/35/9/241.