Many studies have introduced telomerase enzyme activity as a potent indicator of telomere length to examine cellular viability or genomic stability and disease processes (
26). Similar to Radak et al.’s results (
27), we found that both HIIT protocols did not change telomerase activity. As suggested by others (
27), we hypothesized that eight weeks of these exercise protocols are not enough to modify the telomerase activity. Indeed, Ludlow et al. found that only when the exercise training program was sustained for a more extended period (≈ one year), telomerase activity was significantly increased in rat skeletal muscle (
28).
Moreover, it has been suggested that a reduction or inactivation of telomerase activity plays a direct causal role in mammalian aging (
29,
30). Therefore, given the possibility that telomerase activity is reduced in elderly subjects/animals compared to young subjects/animals, the importance and role of these exercise protocols in the development of telomerase activity in older rats can not be denied. However, estimation of enzymatic activity modification at optimal levels could be more challenging in young subjects. In support of this assumption, Osthus et al. demonstrated that older endurance athletes (66 - 77 years) had improved telomeres homeostasis compared to older people with lower physical activity levels. Differences were observed between young endurance athletes (22 - 27 years) and young non-athletes (
26).
Often referred to as the “Guardian of Genome,” p53 is a master regulator of genome integrity to activate the transcription of many essential genes for cell cycle control and apoptosis followed by DNA damage (
28-
31). Moreover, p53 binds to several loci in the cellular genome potentially, which may not be associated with transcription control. This results from a reported genome-wide scan study about p53 (
32). In particular, Tutton et al. showed that p53 could bind the sites in the subtelomeric region close to the terminal telomere repeat tracts. They proposed that p53 binding to these regions confers local chromatin changes associated with increased genome stability (
33). Considering that p53 is also implicated as a critical modulator of skeletal muscle in exercise-induced mitochondrial biogenesis and substrate metabolism (
34), many studies have aimed to identify exercise prescription guidelines to target p53 signaling strategically.
Similar to the results of Safdar et al. (
35), no change in the p53 protein levels was observed following both models of HIIT in our study. However, considering the mean values of changes, we found that HIITL increased the protein level of p53 by 18%. Ludlow et al. observed increased expression of the p53 gene in skeletal muscle after one year of exercise (voluntary wheel running) (
28). On the other hand, they found that the expression of the p53 gene declined over time (with age).
From our point of view, we think that the training period and age of animals used in the study could be important factors in the results obtained from the present study. However, it must be considered that compared to control animals (CT group), the training period keeps the expression of p53 protein more stable, even during the post-training period. Therefore, although the training does not significantly increase the p53 levels in muscle cells, HIIT is likely to reduce cellular impairment and delay muscle aging by maintaining its level in the cell. This effect probably will remain with detraining.
Oxidative stress can be caused by excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, leading to DNA damage and senescence or apoptosis (
36). Several authors have shown that oxidative stress is closely correlated with altered telomeres homeostasis (
37). Generally, regular exercise can protect telomeres from shortening by reducing oxidative stress levels (
38). In the present study, we observed that TOS levels in the HIIT groups decreased compared to the control group (according to the change of mean values, a decrease of 19% in the HIITL group and a decrease of 23% in the group HIITSh) with no change in TAC after the training. Many studies have reported the effect of exercise training on the oxidant-antioxidant system. De Araujo et al. showed that oxidative stress temporarily increased after six weeks of HIIT; then, it decreased after 12 weeks of continuous training; but they did not see any significant changes in the antioxidant system in the gastrocnemius muscle of Wistar rats, which was attributed to the insignificant disturbance of ROS (
39). Based on the results of de Araujo et al. (
39), if HIIT continues for a more extended period, it will probably exhibit significant effects on the TOS level. On the other hand, it is accepted that a higher level of ROS leads to more adaptation in the antioxidant system (
40). In this regard, Hyatt et al. displayed that 10 days of treadmill training enhanced the level of the antioxidant index in the heart and plantaris muscles, while no significant changes were observed in the soleus muscle. The researchers stated that different antioxidant adaptations in the plantaris, heart, and soleus muscles are related to the primary content of intrinsic antioxidants before training or oxidative stress levels owing to exercise. It has been found that the fast-glycolytic muscle fiber phenotype in the plantar may tolerate a higher level of oxidative stress and be replaced by rising antioxidant proteins to a greater degree than the more oxidative-fiber types of soleus and cardiac muscle (
41).
Given that the gastrocnemius is an interstitial muscle (a mixture of fast and slow-twitch fibers), it is likely that in the present study, the training-induced ROS in the gastrocnemius muscle did not increase to such an extent to cause significant changes in antioxidant capacity. Indeed, after eight weeks of training, a reduction in oxidative stress was observed, probably indicating that training altered the antioxidant content, but it was not potent enough to increase TAC. Watson et al. showed that the levels of uric acid, β-carotene, and glutathione (GSH) grew considerably following regular exercise, while TAC declined meaningfully. The lack of connotation between internal antioxidants and TAC was attributed to obstacles in the TAC analysis (
42). However, a review of studies conducted by others determined contrary findings in this regard. We can refer to the investigated tissues, the time course, the type (
43), and the intensity of exercise training protocols to explain inconsistencies in existing reports.
Concerning the effect of detraining on oxidative stress and antioxidant markers, Fatouros et al. demonstrated that endurance training possibly diminishes basal and exercise-induced lipid peroxidation and enhances protection against oxidative stress by rising TAC. It is noteworthy that detraining may converse these training-induced adaptations (
44). Radak et al. also proposed that the advantageous effects of training can change due to detraining (
45). Sheikholeslami-Vatani et al. showed that sprint exercise training could induce adaptations in lipid peroxidation and the antioxidant system, which would be reversed due to detraining (
40). There is no agreement on the place of ROS production in skeletal muscle during detraining periods. In this regard, Whidden et al. proposed the xanthine as a possible source of oxidants in rat skeletal muscle through lengthy periods of inactivity (
46). On the other hand, Kavazis et al. propounded that mitochondria are a significant source of ROS production in skeletal muscle during inactivity (
47). Sheikholeslami-Vatani et al. identified that injuries imposed due to the training could increase ROS during detraining (
40). In the present study, it was observed that during the detraining period, there was a tendency for the TOS level to increase so that the increased TOS level was significantly higher in the detraining HIITSh group than in both HIIT groups. This can be confirmed by other studies due to the deletion of adaptations to the antioxidant capacity during training cessation. Overall, exercise training may act as a stimulus for reducing oxidative stress, primarily when performed continuously. Nevertheless, the effects of HIITL are more stable. However, more studies are required to confirm these results.
In this study, we identified a significant positive association between the levels of p53 and TAC. However, our results did not show any significant correlation between other variables. Therefore, HIIT could help prevent muscle aging by increasing TAC.
5.1. Limitations
This study did not examine the oxidants and antioxidants content and other possible mechanisms affecting telomere length maintenance. This is while the oxidants and antioxidants content could more accurately indicate the possible effects and differences of these two protocols and increase the general knowledge of HIIT. In this regard, detailed studies must be performed to assess the effect of long periods of the two investigated protocols and subsequent detraining on other pathways affecting the telomere length maintenance and oxidant and antioxidant content.
5.2. Conclusions
Telomeres and mitochondria are known as the main factors controlling cellular aging. According to this study, short-period exercise training does not change telomerase activity in rat skeletal muscle, and the time course is an essential factor in increasing the activity of skeletal muscle telomerase in response to exercise training. However, short-period exercise training may help maintain telomere length through other pathways such as attenuation of oxidative stress. The time of the work intervals and the recovery periods between intervals of HIIT induce different and persistent effects. High-intensity interval training with long-term intervals would be more effective because of adaptations in the pathways maintaining telomeres length (attenuation of oxidative stress) and improving the mitochondrial function and content (possibly by increasing p53 levels) with persistent, lasting effects on controlling muscle aging.