4.1. Influence of Aerobics on Body Mass Index of College Students with Obesity
After 12 weeks of moderate to low-intensity aerobics training, the weight loss effects of the experimental and control groups were measured. The chosen BMI index reflects the basic condition of the students' bodies. As shown in
Table 2, before the experiment, there were no significant differences in age, height, weight, and BMI between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). This data analysis ensures that the differences in height and weight between the experimental and control groups will not affect the experiment's accuracy, allowing the experiment to proceed smoothly. After the experiment, there were still no significant differences in age, height, and weight data between the experimental and control groups (P > 0.05), but the BMI data showed a P-value of < 0.01, with a range of change of 1.30 ± 0.05, indicating significant differences between the experimental and control groups after the experiment. This section focuses on the comparative analysis of the data before and after the experiment for both groups. Descriptive analysis was performed to reflect the data differences before and after the experiment.
| Item | Experience Group (30) | Control Group (30) | Variation Value | P-Value |
|---|
| Age | | | | |
| BE | 20.67 ± 2.60 | 20.13 ± 1.38 | 0.54 ± 1.22 | 0.33 |
| AE | 20.67 ± 2.60 | 20.13 ± 1.38 | 0.54 ± 1.22 | 0.33 |
| Height (m) | | | | |
| BE | 1.69 ± 0.09 | 1.68 ± 0.09 | 0.001 ± 0.00 | 0.97 |
| AE | 1.70 ± 0.09 | 1.69 ± 0.09 | 0.005 ± 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Weigh (kg) | | | | |
| BE | 86.02 ± 10.00 | 85.90 ± 10.77 | 0.115 ± 0.77 | 0.97 |
| AE | 78.72 ± 9.76 | 81.81 ± 10.46 | 3.088 ± 0.70 | 0.24 |
| BMI | | | | |
| BE | 30.18 ± 0.73 | 30.16 ± 0.73 | 0.029 ± 0.00 | 0.88 |
| AE | 27.32 ± 0.84 | 28.62 ± 0.89 | 1.296 ± 0.05 | 0.00 |
Abbreviations: BE and AE ,before experiment and after experiment; BMI, Body Mass Index.
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
The index changes of the experimental and control groups are shown in
Table 2. The height of the students in the experimental group increased from 1.69 ± 0.09 before the experiment to 1.69 ± 0.09 after the experiment, with a change range of 0.01 ± 0.00, P > 0.05, showing no significant differences. For college students, short-term exercise is unrealistic for height growth, and the same is true for aerobics. There was no significant difference in height before and after the experiment. Variations such as chest bulging, hunchback, and different test times (e.g., morning measurements) may cause slight differences in height data but do not affect the experiment's accuracy. Body weight decreased from 86.02 ± 10.00 before the experiment to 78.72 ± 9.76 after the experiment, with a range of 7.29 ± 0.24, P < 0.05, showing significant differences. Body Mass Index decreased from 30.18 ± 0.73 before the experiment to 27.32 ± 0.84 after the experiment, with a range of 2.86 ± 0.11, P < 0.01, showing significant differences. Therefore, it can be interpreted that a certain duration of aerobics exercise can achieve weight loss. The rise in height is due to the improvement of body posture after practicing aerobics.
The height of students in the control group increased from 1.68 ± 0.09 before the experiment to 1.69 ± 0.09 after the experiment, with a change range of 0.01 ± 0.00, P > 0.05, showing no significant differences. Body weight decreased from 85.90 ± 10.77 before the experiment to 81.81 ± 10.46 after the experiment, with a range of 83.19 ± 0.31, P < 0.05, showing significant differences. Body Mass Index decreased from 30.16 ± 0.73 before the experiment to 28.62 ± 0.89 after the experiment, with a range of 1.54 ± 0.84, P < 0.01, showing significant differences. Therefore, it can be interpreted that general and regular physical activity can achieve weight loss. It can be observed that the proportion of weight and BMI reduction is higher in the experimental group, indicating that aerobics exercise has a more substantial effect on weight loss among obese college students.
4.2. The Influence of Aerobics on the Mental Health of Obese College Students
Table 3 shows the mental health levels of students in the experimental and control groups, tested by the Mental Health Scale of Chinese College Students before the experiment. The test results were statistically analyzed, and the descriptive statistics of the overall mental health levels were compared with the national average level.
Table 3 displays the 12 dimensions of mental health tests for both the experimental and control groups. The results indicate no significant difference in the mental health test data of the two groups before the experiment (P > 0.05), excluding interference caused by differences in the data of the two groups.
| Item | Experience Group (30) | Control Group (30) | P-Value | National Average | Effect Size (Cohen's d) |
|---|
| Somatization | 15.03 ± 1.61 | 15.13 ± 1.613 | 0.65 | 13.27 ± 4.24 | -0.060 |
| Anxiety | 17.3 ± 2.38 | 17.17 ± 2.321 | 0.33 | 16.60 ± 5.36 | 0.055 |
| Depression | 16.47 ± 2.01 | 16.53 ± 2.389 | 0.91 | 16.00 ± 5.37 | −0.027 |
| Inferiority | 16.97 ± 3.57 | 17.13 ± 3.481 | 0.10 | 15.12 ± 5.15 | −0.045 |
| Paranoid | 16.93 ± 2.33 | 17.17 ± 4.251 | 0.76 | 15.13 ± 4.95 | −0.074 |
| Compulsion | 18.20 ± 2.73 | 18.11 ± 2.857 | 0.79 | 18.23 ± 5.32 | 0.032 |
| Withdrawal | 16.33 ± 2.10 | 16.43 ± 2.201 | 0.54 | 15.59 ± 5.37 | −0.046 |
| Aggression | 14.03 ± 2.39 | 14.00 ± 2.491 | 0.75 | 14.27 ± 4.38 | 0.012 |
| Sex psychology | 12.08 ± 3.44 | 12.17 ± 3.415 | 0.264 | 11.37 ± 4.01 | −0.026 |
| Dependence | 16.37 ± 2.70 | 16.20 ± 2.469 | 0.169 | 16.78 ± 5.45 | 0.066 |
| Impulse | 14.58 ± 2.19 | 14.47 ± 2.29 | 0.38 | 14.72 ± 4.49 | 0.049 |
| Psychosis | 11.10 ± 2.40 | 11.20 ± 2.43 | 0.48 | 12.00 ± 3.65 | −0.041 |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
In terms of somatization, the experimental group exhibited a mean score of 15.03 ± 1.608, while the control group had a mean score of 15.13 ± 1.61, both exceeding the national average level of 13.27 ± 4.24. Similarly, for inferiority, the experimental group had a mean score of 16.97 ± 3.57, and the control group had a mean score of 17.13 ± 3.48, both higher than the national average level of 15.12 ± 5.15. Additionally, in terms of paranoia, the experimental group had a mean score of 16.93 ± 2.33, while the control group had a mean score of 17.17 ± 4.25, both surpassing the national average level of 15.13 ± 4.95.
Furthermore, although the average scores for anxiety, depression, compulsion, withdrawal, and sexual psychology were higher than the national average, the differences were relatively small, suggesting that the research population may exhibit some psychological issues in these areas. Conversely, the average levels of aggression, dependence, impulse, and psychosis were all lower than the national average, indicating that the subjects exhibited better psychological health in these aspects.
Table 4 shows the mental health levels of the experimental and control groups after the experiment, compared and analyzed against the national average level. The data results from
Table 4 demonstrate.
| Item | Experience Group (30) | Control Group (30) | P Value | National Average | Effect Size (Cohen's d) |
|---|
| Somatization | 12.30 ± 1.60 | 13.67 ± 16.26 | 0.00 | 13.27 ± 4.24 | -0.119 |
| Anxiety | 14.13 ± 1.89 | 16.54 ± 2.16 | 0.00 | 16.60 ± 5.36 | -1.201 |
| Depressed | 14.20 ± 2.10 | 15.01 ± 2.28 | 0.00 | 16.00 ± 5.37 | -0.369 |
| Inferiority | 14.87 ± 0.55 | 15.70 ± 0.58 | 0.00 | 15.12 ± 5.15 | -2.024 |
| Paranoid | 15.07 ± 2.15 | 15.90 ± 2.01 | 0.01 | 15.13 ± 4.95 | -0.401 |
| Compulsion | 15.17 ± 3.10 | 16.03 ± 2.43 | 0.00 | 18.23 ± 5.32 | -0.310 |
| Withdrawal | 13.97 ± 1.45 | 15.03 ± 1.72 | 0.00 | 15.59 ± 5.37 | -0.668 |
| Aggression | 12.74 ± 1.89 | 13.33 ± 1.94 | 0.00 | 14.27 ± 4.38 | -0.309 |
| Sex psychology | 10.38 ± 1.38 | 11.27 ± 1.20 | 0.02 | 11.37 ± 4.01 | -0.735 |
| Dependence | 13.97 ± 2.36 | 14.23 ± 2.45 | 0.04 | 16.78 ± 5.45 | -0.108 |
| Impulse | 12.53 ± 2.57 | 13.47 ± 2.33 | 0.00 | 14.72 ± 4.49 | -0.384 |
| Psychosis | 9.87 ± 2.01 | 10.83 ± 1.64 | 0.000 | 12.00 ± 3.65 | -0.538 |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Somatization: 12.30 ± 1.60 in the experimental group and 13.67 ± 16.26 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. This showed that the experimental group performed better in terms of physical symptoms. The experimental group also had a somatization score lower than the national average of 13.27 ± 4.24, indicating that the experimental group was relatively healthier in terms of somatization. Anxiety: 14.13 ± 1.89 in the experimental group and 16.54 ± 2.16 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. The anxiety scores of the experimental group were also lower than the national average of 16.60 ± 5.36, indicating that the experimental group performed better in terms of anxiety. Depression: 14.20 ± 2.19 in the experimental group and 15.03 ± 2.28 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating statistically significant differences after the experiment. Depression scores in the experimental group were also lower than the national average of 16.00 ± 5.37, indicating that the experimental group had a positive performance in terms of depression. Inferiority: 14.87 ± 0.55 in the experimental group and 15.70 ± 0.58 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. Compared with the national average of 15.12 ± 5.15, the experimental group had lower inferiority scores, showing a positive effect on self-esteem. Paranoia: 15.07 ± 2.15 in the experimental group and 15.90 ± 2.01 in the control group, P < 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. Paranoia scores in the experimental group were relatively low but close to the national average of 15.13 ± 4.95. Compulsion: 15.17 ± 3.10 in the experimental group and 16.03 ± 2.43 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. The compulsion score of the experimental group was also significantly lower than the national average of 18.23 ± 5.32, indicating that the experimental group was healthier in terms of compulsive symptoms. Withdrawal: 13.97 ± 1.45 in the experimental group and 15.03 ± 1.72 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. At the same time, the withdrawal score of the experimental group was also lower than the national average of 15.59 ± 5.37, indicating that the experimental group was more active in terms of social withdrawal.
Aggression: 12.74 ± 1.89 in the experimental group and 13.33 ± 1.94 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating statistically significant differences after the experiment. The aggression score of the experimental group was also lower than the national average of 14.27 ± 4.38, indicating that the experimental group was more moderate in terms of aggressive behavior. Psychosexual health: 10.38 ± 1.38 in the experimental group and 11.27 ± 1.20 in the control group, p < 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. The psychosexual score of the experimental group was relatively lower than the national average of 11.37 ± 4.01, indicating improvement in psychosexual health. Dependence: 13.97 ± 2.36 in the experimental group and 14.23 ± 2.45 in the control group, P < 0.05, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. The dependence score of the experimental group was relatively lower than the national average of 16.78 ± 5.45, indicating success in reducing external dependence. Impulsivity: 12.53 ± 2.57 in the experimental group and 13.47 ± 2.33 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating statistically significant differences after the experiment. Impulsivity scores in the experimental group were also lower than the national average of 14.72 ± 4.49, indicating greater stability in impulsive behavior. Psychosis: 9.87 ± 2.01 in the experimental group and 10.83 ± 1.64 in the control group, P < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference after the experiment. The psychopathic tendency score of the experimental group was also lower than the national average of 12.00 ± 3.65, indicating good mental health in the experimental group.
The aerobics exercise scores of the experimental group were significantly lower on most mental health items than those of the control group and also lower than the national average on many items. This shows that the aerobics exercise received by the experimental group has a remarkable effect on mental health.