Some scholars criticize the authorities for prioritizing scientific articles and publication metrics. Critics argue that scientific articles are mostly meaningless regarding societal challenges. This belief is a misconception, as producing scientific articles is not separate from or disconnected from solving societal problems. Research and its associated scientific articles are inherently problem-based. Scientific articles are outputs of researchers reporting solutions for existing problems in different domains that affect human lives. Every scientific report is rooted in scientists’ curiosity about a recognized gap and is grounded in the scientific method (1). Studies must be useful and problem-based, especially in the context of clinical research (2). The ultimate goal of research is to improve society and the quality of life of humans (3). One notable instance is the COVID-19 vaccine (4), which not only advances knowledge and simultaneously benefits humans, but also addresses the challenges of developing technology and products. Scientific articles are a prerequisite for new technologies; the mRNA story of the COVID-19 vaccine is an instance that is reflected in the scientific articles published. During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid peer review and publication of scientific articles directly influenced the knowledge on the virus, interventions, and vaccine production. Diagnostic tools, therapeutic and rehabilitation devices are all first introduced via research and published scientific articles (5, 6). Studies conducted are pieced together like a puzzle to lead to significant impacts over time. However, the impact of research outputs is not usually immediate and may take up to 9 or 12 years (7). The researchers work not only to advance knowledge, but also to ensure that their research output benefits society. The influence of research outputs on non-academic audiences is increased. While bibliometric indicators show the academic impact, altmetric indicators are used as complements to citation measures as means of social, media, informative, and political influence of research (8). The purpose of researchers is broader and goes beyond individual metrics and citations. It is directed toward solving societal problems. Scientific articles are the main means of communicating and accumulating knowledge for identifying problems. Guidelines and large-scale scientific articles (9) provide evidence-based insights for health professionals and policymakers. A shift from traditional academia to neoliberal academia has posed additional challenges for academics (10). Scientific articles are not merely science outputs; they are also instruments for solving societal problems and progress. Basic and applied research are not separated. Any policies and products require a theory. Researchers should be concerned about both theories to advance knowledge and to improve society. We should acknowledge, support, and protect scientific writing as an important core value in academia as a bridge to societal problem-solving.
Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies
The Official Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Image Credit:Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud
Outlines
Scientific Articles: A Bridge to Societal Problem-Solving
Author(s):
1Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Research Center for War-Affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Published online:Feb 11, 2026
Article type:Editorial
Received:Feb 01, 2026
Accepted:Feb 02, 2026
How to Cite:Nakhostin Ansari N. Scientific Articles: A Bridge to Societal Problem-Solving. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2026;13(2):e169971. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-169971
Footnotes
References
- 1.Kashi-Alashti M, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Fathali M, Bartley J. The anti-inflammatory role of therapeutic ultrasound and low-level laser in chronic rhinosinusitis: A fractional exhaled nitric oxide outcome hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses. 2024;193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111519.
- 2.Ioannidis JP. Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6). e1002049. [PubMed ID: 27328301]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4915619]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049.
- 3.Gamboa C, Shaw R, Obeng E. Do social scientists care if they make societal impact? (White Paper). Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2025. Available from: https://www.sagepub.com/docs/default-source/corp-comms/do-social-scientists-care-if-they-make-societal-impact.pdf?sfvrsn=237ab1c_1.
- 4.Deak C, Pardi N, Miklosi A. Innovation in the 21st century: following the footsteps of Katalin Kariko. Biol Futur. 2023;74(1-2):101-8. [PubMed ID: 37213055]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10201475]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-023-00161-8.
- 5.Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Varedi M, Fathali M, Zarrin M, Kashi-Alashti M, et al. Use of low-level laser therapy for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;38(1):5. [PubMed ID: 36538169]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03684-z.
- 6.Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Fathali M, Bartley J, Rastak MS. A randomized clinical trial comparing pulsed ultrasound and erythromycin phonophoresis in the treatment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(3):166-72. [PubMed ID: 25495769]. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2014.991465.
- 7.Jefferson G, Henry R, Heyeres M, Morgan R, Tomas L, Tsey K, et al. Impact through research in education and studies in human society: A review of Australian Research Council 'high-for-impact' case studies. PLoS One. 2024;19(5). e0302877. [PubMed ID: 38820322]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11142438]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302877.
- 8.De Filippo D, Morillo F, González-Albo B. Measuring the Impact and Influence of Scientific Activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Publications. 2023;11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11020031.
- 9.G. B. D. Disease Injury; Risk Factor Collaborators. Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable burden of 88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet. 2025;406(10513):1873-922. [PubMed ID: 41092926]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC12535840]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01637-X.
- 10.Gasser RB. Neoliberalism in academia: reflections from a parasitologist. Parasit Vectors. 2024;17(1):487. [PubMed ID: 39582015]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11587603]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06574-1.
Copyright
Copyright © 2026, Nakhostin Ansari. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Crossmark
Checking
Comments
Number of Comments:0Cited by
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
Purchasing Reprints
- Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations
Related Articles