Cover image of the article: Scientific Articles: A Bridge to Societal Problem-Solving

Image Credit:Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud

Scientific Articles: A Bridge to Societal Problem-Solving

Authors

Noureddin Nakhostin AnsariNoureddin Nakhostin Ansari ORCID1, 2,*
1Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Research Center for War-Affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Email: nakhostin@tums.ac.ir

Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies:Vol. 13, issue 2; e169971
Published online:Feb 11, 2026
Article type:Editorial
Received:Feb 01, 2026
Accepted:Feb 02, 2026
How to Cite:Nakhostin Ansari N. Scientific Articles: A Bridge to Societal Problem-Solving. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2026;13(2):e169971. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-169971

Some scholars criticize the authorities for prioritizing scientific articles and publication metrics. Critics argue that scientific articles are mostly meaningless regarding societal challenges. This belief is a misconception, as producing scientific articles is not separate from or disconnected from solving societal problems. Research and its associated scientific articles are inherently problem-based. Scientific articles are outputs of researchers reporting solutions for existing problems in different domains that affect human lives. Every scientific report is rooted in scientists’ curiosity about a recognized gap and is grounded in the scientific method (1). Studies must be useful and problem-based, especially in the context of clinical research (2). The ultimate goal of research is to improve society and the quality of life of humans (3). One notable instance is the COVID-19 vaccine (4), which not only advances knowledge and simultaneously benefits humans, but also addresses the challenges of developing technology and products. Scientific articles are a prerequisite for new technologies; the mRNA story of the COVID-19 vaccine is an instance that is reflected in the scientific articles published. During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid peer review and publication of scientific articles directly influenced the knowledge on the virus, interventions, and vaccine production. Diagnostic tools, therapeutic and rehabilitation devices are all first introduced via research and published scientific articles (5, 6). Studies conducted are pieced together like a puzzle to lead to significant impacts over time. However, the impact of research outputs is not usually immediate and may take up to 9 or 12 years (7). The researchers work not only to advance knowledge, but also to ensure that their research output benefits society. The influence of research outputs on non-academic audiences is increased. While bibliometric indicators show the academic impact, altmetric indicators are used as complements to citation measures as means of social, media, informative, and political influence of research (8). The purpose of researchers is broader and goes beyond individual metrics and citations. It is directed toward solving societal problems. Scientific articles are the main means of communicating and accumulating knowledge for identifying problems. Guidelines and large-scale scientific articles (9) provide evidence-based insights for health professionals and policymakers. A shift from traditional academia to neoliberal academia has posed additional challenges for academics (10). Scientific articles are not merely science outputs; they are also instruments for solving societal problems and progress. Basic and applied research are not separated. Any policies and products require a theory. Researchers should be concerned about both theories to advance knowledge and to improve society. We should acknowledge, support, and protect scientific writing as an important core value in academia as a bridge to societal problem-solving.

Footnotes

  • AI Use Disclosure: The authors declare that no generative AI tools were used in the creation of this article.

  • Authors' Contribution: N. N. A. is the only author of the article and the study was solely carried out by the author.

  • Conflict of Interests Statement: The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • Data Availability: The dataset presented in the study is available on request from the corresponding author during submission or after publication.

  • Funding/Support: The author declares no funding/support.

References

Copyright

Copyright © 2026, Nakhostin Ansari. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Mar
2012
Scientific Apartheid

Scientific Apartheid

Abdol Majid Cheraghali

Cheraghali A. Scientific Apartheid. Hepat Mon. 2012;12(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.841

30
Jul
2025
Ethical Dilemmas in Academic Publishing: The Influence of Journal Impact Factor and the Misbehavior in Peer Review in Scientific Research

Ethical Dilemmas in Academic Publishing: The Influence of Journal Impact Factor and the Misbehavior in Peer Review in Scientific Research

SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi,
Payman Rahimzadeh,
Esmaeil Mehraeen

SeyedAlinaghi S, Rahimzadeh P, Mehraeen E. Ethical Dilemmas in Academic Publishing: The Influence of Journal Impact Factor and the Misbehavior in Peer Review in Scientific Research. Shiraz E-Med J. 2025;26(9):e160883. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-160883

28
Jan
2020
The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords

The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords

Zahra Bahadoran,
Parvin Mirmiran,
Khosrow Kashfi,
Asghar Ghasemi

Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;18(1):e100159. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.100159

1
Aug
2020
Academic Dishonesty in Publication of Qualitative Studies

Academic Dishonesty in Publication of Qualitative Studies

Camellia Torabizadeh,
Fatemeh Vizeshfar

Torabizadeh C, Vizeshfar F. Academic Dishonesty in Publication of Qualitative Studies. Shiraz E-Med J. 2020;22(7):e105390. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/semj.105390

31
Dec
2022
Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals

Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals

Asghar Ghasemi,
Parvin Mirmiran,
Khosrow Kashfi,
Zahra Bahadoran

Ghasemi A, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Bahadoran Z. Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2023;21(1):e131812. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem-131812

More by these authors

Noureddin Nakhostin AnsariPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics
Indexed in