5.1. An Unprecedented People-Centered Phenomenon in Mass Gathering Medicine
The spontaneous nighttime gatherings that emerged in cities across Iran following military aggression against the country during the winter of 2026 constituted unprecedented, community-led mass gatherings with no direct precedent in the Mass Gathering
Medicine literature (
Figure 1). Unlike planned religious events such as the Hajj or large-scale sporting events, these gatherings were unplanned, recurrent, nocturnal, and entirely driven by community solidarity in the context of an active military conflict (
2,
3). The large-scale nationwide participation, combined with the spontaneous nature of the gatherings and their occurrence in a wartime environment, places them in a category not yet adequately addressed by existing Mass Gathering
Medicine frameworks.
Community-led mass gatherings in Iran (4)
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first systematic qualitative investigation of health and safety management in solidarity-based public gatherings conducted during an active military conflict. Accordingly, the present study contributes a novel typology to the Mass Gathering Medicine literature: community-centered solidarity gatherings during crises. This type of gathering can be distinguished from other forms of mass gatherings by several defining characteristics: 1) the absence of a formal organizing authority and reliance on community capacity; 2) repeated implementation at short time intervals; 3) a high degree of emotional intensity and collective engagement; and 4) most importantly, pervasive national anxiety dominating the psychosocial atmosphere of the gathering and imposing a shared psychological burden on participants.
Perhaps the most remarkable finding of this study was not what was absent, but what was present despite the absence of any formal mandate. Within only a few days of the onset of the conflict, communities across Iran had established health stations staffed by volunteer physicians and nurses, waste segregation systems, lighting infrastructure, traffic management pathways, and cultural and psychosocial support services, all without centralized coordination or pre-established emergency response plans. In contrast to the present findings, Alrabie et al. emphasized the importance of leadership structures, coordination through unified command systems, and the implementation of clearly defined, pre-established protocols in mass gathering management (
18).
This capacity reflects what Norris et al. describe as community resilience: the collective ability to absorb disruption, self-organize, and adapt in the absence of institutional guidance (
19). Furthermore, unlike the circumstances observed in the present study, effective mass gathering management is generally considered to require extensive coordination among service providers, including healthcare personnel, as well as formal pre-event training programs (
20). The broad spectrum of capacities identified in this study, including medical and safety services, welfare and environmental infrastructure, psychosocial services, accessibility measures, volunteer-driven management, and organizational learning, demonstrates the substantial latent capacity of Iranian civil society that was activated during the crisis. The presence of Red Crescent tents, volunteer-operated first-aid stations, high-visibility vests used for crowd management, and organized waste collection systems within gatherings that lacked formal event authorization illustrates a striking manifestation of social capital under conditions of societal stress.
From a public health perspective, these findings have important implications. They suggest that community-based health infrastructure, when mobilized through strong social cohesion, can partially compensate for formal emergency health systems during the acute phase of a crisis. This observation is consistent with the work of Drury et al. on collective resilience during mass emergencies, which demonstrates that shared identity and mutual aid behaviors reliably emerge among populations facing a common threat (
21). The Ramadan War’s community-led mass gatherings may therefore serve as a natural laboratory for understanding how social capital can be transformed into health-protective behaviors at the population level.
Despite the exceptional self-organizing capacity demonstrated by the community, this study identified several areas for service improvement across all six thematic domains. This finding should not be interpreted as criticism of affected communities; rather, it represents a structural observation regarding the inherent limitations of informal organization in high-risk environments. As Hall et al. have argued, social capital is a necessary but insufficient condition for protecting population health (
22). Social capital alone cannot substitute for evidence-based protocols, trained personnel, or pre-positioned resources and equipment. Moreover, social capital itself may gradually erode during prolonged crises unless reinforced through targeted interventions, including collective community-based activities and organized social engagement initiatives.
Substantial gaps were identified across multiple domains. Deficiencies were particularly pronounced in accessibility, inclusiveness, and human resource management. The findings indicate that virtually no dedicated provisions had been established for persons with disabilities, breastfeeding mothers, older adults, or individuals with limited proficiency in the Persian language. This observation aligns with a well-documented pattern in the mass gathering literature. In this regard, Alrabie et al. reported that language barriers directly influence access to services and the effectiveness of service delivery during mass gatherings (
18). Similarly, persons with disabilities frequently encounter substantial barriers to equitable access to healthcare services, resulting in unmet needs and inadequate accommodation of their specific requirements (
23). Despite the central position of persons with disabilities within international health equity frameworks, inclusiveness is often systematically overlooked in informal and emergency settings. The absence of wheelchair-accessible ramps, sign language interpretation services, designated breastfeeding spaces, and multilingual communication mechanisms in gatherings involving millions of participants represents a substantial deficiency in achieving health equity and inclusive emergency planning.
Following accessibility-related deficiencies, the domain of psychosocial services and mental health support exhibited some of the most significant shortcomings identified in this study. Given the wartime context in which these gatherings occurred, this finding represents a serious concern for population health and well-being. Participants in these gatherings were not merely attendees at a cultural event; they were civilians actively processing acute national psychological trauma, grief, uncertainty, and existential distress.
Guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings identify community gatherings during periods of conflict as priority environments for the deployment of psychological first aid and psychosocial support interventions. The near-complete absence of trained mental health professionals, psychological first-aid stations, and bereavement support resources within these gatherings therefore represents a missed opportunity with substantial public health implications. In this regard, the study by Choi et al. demonstrated that the psychological consequences of disasters and emergencies are not limited to direct victims and eyewitnesses; individuals exposed solely through media coverage may also experience persistent psychological effects that endure for years following the event (
24). Consequently, the availability of mental health professionals and psychosocial support resources becomes even more critical in situations characterized by acute national psychological trauma.
Significant deficiencies were also identified in safety, emergency management, and operational preparedness, most notably with respect to evacuation planning. The absence of clearly designated safe evacuation routes, the lack of an appointed evacuation coordinator, and the unavailability of emergency power generators in gatherings of this magnitude substantially increase the risk of mass casualty incidents. Evidence from Mass Gathering
Medicine has consistently demonstrated that crowd crush, crowd surge, and evacuation failure are among the leading causes of major incidents and mass casualty events in large-scale gatherings (
25,
26). The 2015 Mina disaster during the Hajj, which resulted in more than 2000 deaths and injuries, remains one of the most prominent examples of the consequences of inadequate crowd-density management and insufficient evacuation infrastructure (
27). Although the Ramadan War community-led mass gatherings did not experience such an incident, the structural conditions associated with these risks were nevertheless present.
Important deficiencies were likewise identified in the provision of medical services. Among the most critical were the absence of AEDs and the lack of dedicated medical response teams operating under clearly defined clinical and operational protocols. The evidence supporting AED deployment in mass gatherings is unequivocal: survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is strongly associated with the time to first defibrillation, and the availability of AEDs in high-risk public settings has been shown to increase survival rates by as much as twofold (
28,
29). In gatherings involving tens of thousands of participants, including older adults experiencing substantial emotional stress, the absence of AEDs constitutes a preventable and unacceptable risk to public safety.
5.2. Lessons for Policy and Practice
The findings of this study yield five practical lessons for health system planners, emergency managers, and civil society organizations.
First, social capital is not a substitute for planning. The exceptional community response documented in this study should be recognized and built upon, rather than used to justify the absence of formal preparedness mechanisms. The WHO mass gathering health framework explicitly stipulates that even informal and spontaneous gatherings exceeding a defined threshold should trigger a minimum public health response protocol (
2). The experience of spontaneous public participation in Iran demonstrates that communities will mobilize when needed; therefore, the health system must be prepared to mobilize alongside them.
Second, volunteer training functions as a force multiplier. The volunteers who managed these mass gatherings were highly motivated, organized, and effective within the scope of their existing competencies. Structured predeployment training in basic life support, psychological first aid, crowd safety, and inclusive service delivery could have substantially enhanced their operational capacity at minimal cost (
30). Accordingly, the development of a national volunteer training curriculum for mass gatherings conducted in crisis settings should be considered a strategic priority.
Third, data collection is a prerequisite for organizational learning. This study identified no systematic mechanism for documenting health incidents, service utilization, or near-miss events during the gatherings. In the absence of such data, it is impossible to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, identify emerging public health threats, or improve future response efforts. Minimum standards for health information management provide a practical framework that can be adapted to this context.
Fourth, inclusiveness must be a design principle rather than an afterthought. Accessible health services during emergencies constitute a right rather than a preference. In this regard, future gatherings of this nature should incorporate accessibility audits, dedicated support personnel, and inclusive communication mechanisms as fundamental operational requirements.
Fifth, mental health must be considered a frontline response priority. Guidelines and the growing literature on collective trauma among conflict-affected populations demonstrate that psychological first aid is not a luxury service (
31). In gatherings where participants are simultaneously grieving, celebrating, and processing an existential threat, mental health support is as essential as physical first-aid services.
5.3. Limitations
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings of this study. Although the qualitative design was appropriate for the exploratory objectives of the research, it does not permit generalization of the findings to all gatherings or all regions of Iran. Field observations were conducted by a single researcher without the use of a standardized observational instrument, raising the possibility of observer bias.
Furthermore, security and logistical constraints limited access to certain gathering sites and may have introduced sampling bias in both the observational and interview components of the study. The wartime context also precluded the use of quantitative methodologies and probability-based sampling approaches.
Finally, the absence of a formal incident reporting system meant that health outcomes associated with these mass gatherings, including injury rates, patterns of medical service utilization, and mental health consequences, remain unknown and could not be measured within the scope of the present dataset. Consequently, the study primarily reflects observed capacities, operational practices, and perceived challenges rather than objectively measured health outcomes.
5.4. Conclusions
The Ramadan War’s community-led mass gatherings of 2026 constitute a historic and unprecedented expression of civic solidarity in response to military conflict. The infrastructure that communities spontaneously established around these gatherings without formal mandates, assigned responsibilities, or institutional direction, and under conditions of acute national stress, provides compelling evidence of the depth of social capital within Iranian society and the commitment of its volunteer health workforce. This study documents that capacity with the recognition and respect it merits.
At the same time, the findings demonstrate that, alongside the remarkable achievements of these gatherings, several structural vulnerabilities existed in areas including accessibility, mental health support, evacuation safety, and emergency medical response. Under different circumstances, these shortcomings could have produced substantial public health consequences. The central argument of this study is not that these gatherings failed; on the contrary, they were remarkably successful. Rather, the findings suggest that they succeeded despite the absence of systems and capacities that should have been present, and future crises may not prove equally forgiving. The field of Mass Gathering
Medicine has much to learn from the Iranian experience. Likewise, the Iranian health system stands to benefit substantially from integrating the principles, evidence base, and operational frameworks of Mass Gathering
Medicine into future preparedness and response planning (
Figure 2).
Preparation of the graves of the Minab School students who lost their lives during the military air attacks on Iran.