The results of this study showed that cognitive disorders were common in hemodialysis patients, and about one-third of these patients had cognitive impairment, which was clearly higher than the rate in the general population (3.2%) (
12). The results of our study are in line with the results of other studies, such as in the United States that the population of hemodialysis patients is 700,000, two-thirds of whom have cognitive impairment (
13). Other studies have also reported a high prevalence of cognitive impairment in ESRD patients. Eslami Amirabadi et al. in a study performed in Tehran reported this rate to be 47% (
9). Kalirao et al. found that two-thirds of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients had cognitive impairments, which is consistent with our finding if we consider the total number of suspected and problematic cases (
7); also, it is consistent with the results of Tamadon et al., who showed that 28.2% of ESRD patients had severe cognitive impairment, which was significantly higher than the rate of cognitive impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease (
14). Murray et al. reported that more than one-third of hemodialysis patients had severe cognitive impairment (
15); this high prevalence can have several causes. For instance, kidney problems can affect brain function. Aging, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia (along with chronic inflammation), oxidative stress, and hypercoagulopathy can also cause vascular and endothelial damage, affecting the kidneys and the brain. Uremic toxins have a direct effect on neurons through the neurodegenerative mechanism (
10).
Further, studies have shown that dialysis patients have brain atrophy, reduced hippocampal volume, thinning of the cerebral cortex in the temporomandibular joint and white matter damage in the fornix, inner capsule, and thalamus, all of which are similar to aging changes. This evidence can be seen on imaging even before changes the hemodialysis patient's functional and cognitive status (
16). On the other hand, chronic inflammation in hemodialysis patients increases the level of cytokines, impairs the secretion of neurotransmitters, and exacerbates neurological and cognitive disorders (
17). Studies have also demonstrated that decreased cerebral blood flow during dialysis and continued dialysis during the month are associated with cerebrovascular disease and decreased cerebral function in these patients (
18). In general, the common mechanisms of increased cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients increase by vascular disease, oxidative stress, silent or overt cerebral infarction, hyperhomocysteinemia, impaired renal function, anemia, inadequate dialysis, malnutrition, and chronic inflammation (
10).
Our study indicated that the increased frequency of dialysis and the number of years of dialysis were associated with a higher rate of cognitive impairment. The results were consistent with the results obtained by Sarnak et al., as well as the hypothesis that an increase in the speed of atherosclerosis is associated with a higher MMSE score (
19). Studies have shown that brain function improves following kidney transplantation (
18), and efforts should be made to provide kidney transplantation for these patients more quickly. The rate of cognitive disorders in hemodialysis patients is high due to the increased prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, followed by renal dysfunction and increased need for dialysis, and these patients need special care. Cognitive impairment is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization (
13). According to our model, elderly patients who have been dialyzed longer and patients who have been on dialysis more often are at a higher risk for cognitive impairment. Other studies confirm our results (
19). It is recommended that during periodic visits of hemodialysis patients, these patients should be examined for cognitive impairment and, if necessary, treatment should be initiated as soon as possible, and, if possible, kidney transplantation should be performed more quickly.
Moreover, the small number of samples and the lack of imaging, along with not examining the inflammatory factors, were the limitations of our study.