The present study’s main finding was significantly increased serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels after 12 weeks of Pilates training, which is consistent with AlMulhim et al.’s (
21) and Hajinajaf et al.’s (
5) study results. The results of Hajinajaf et al.’s study (
5), examining the effect of aerobic exercise on serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and anthropometric characteristics in obese and overweight women, showed a significant increase in serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels. Since obesity is associated with vitamin D deficiency (
22), body weight, especially fat mass, is one of the factors adversely affecting vitamin D status and making it accessible to 25-hydroxy vitamin D. In contrast, physical activity results in weight loss and increases lipolysis and adipose tissue movement, thereby increasing serum vitamin D levels (
23). Another notable factor is the effect of physical activity on bone mass, resulting in decreased calcium secretion and increased absorption efficiency. Increasing serum calcium can also save serum vitamin D levels (
24). The present study had limitations such as lack of precise nutrition control, lack of sun exposure, and coverage of subjects. Nevertheless, one reason for the increase in serum vitamin D levels in the present study is subjects’ weight loss in the exercise group, although it was less than the normal value of 20 ng/mL. The main reason for vitamin D deficiency is body fat because vitamin D is soluble in fat and is readily absorbed by fat cells (
25).
Other factors measured in the present study were changes in body parameters such as body weight, BMI, WHR, and body fat percentage, all of which significantly decreased after 12 weeks of Pilates training compared to the control group. Studies have shown that deep breathing during exercise increases the energy consumption of fats. The reason is that in addition to active muscles, involved respiratory muscles also consume energy (
26). Since deep and diaphragmic breathing is one of the most important principles of Pilates training, Pilates training is expected to have significant effects on body fat mass, fat percentage, and weight (
27,
28). This study’s results showed a positive effect of Pilates training on lipid profile. Concentrations of triglyceride, cholesterol, and HDL-C were significantly different in the training group compared to the control group, but the LDL-C levels were not significantly changed. Exercise more affects the lipid profile of people with higher TG and LDL-C levels or lower HDL-C levels (
29). Studies with animal samples have also shown similar results. For example, 12 weeks of resistance training have been shown to improve lipid profile in healthy (
30) and ovoctomized rats (
31). Accordingly, eight weeks of resistance training improved lipid profile in rats with either fatty or normal diet (
32). There was a significant decrease in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the exercise group compared to the control group after 12 weeks of Pilates training. It could be attributed to the intensity and duration of training, age, sex, and health status of the participants. Another measured factor was HDL-C level that significantly increased. There is sufficient consensus on positive changes in HDL-C, resulting from exercising in the research literature. Positive changes in HDL-C were observed even in a single session training. These results are consistent with Henderson et al.’s findings (
33), but not with Arsalan et al.’s results (
34). Major differences between those studies and the present study were the subjects’ characteristics and exercise protocols. For example, it appears that eight weeks of exercise are insufficient to improve some lipid profile indices. Muscle activity usually increases by subcutaneous aerobic activities to produce energy through fat metabolism, thereby increasing fat oxidation. In this type of exercise, the lipid oxidation rate is tripled due to an increase in epinephrine activity and a reduction in insulin stimulation.
The present study’s results also showed no significant change in LDL-C levels. One factor that could possibly justify the change of this parameter in the present study is the female subjects. It has been shown that changes in lipoprotein levels are usually less responsive to exercise in women than in men, partly due to lower cholesterol levels in women compared to men (
35). The limitations of this study were lack of positive food intake, lack of nutritional status control, and lack of exposure to sunlight. Future studies should be carried out in a longitudinal fashion, taking into account the amount of sun exposure, nutrition status, and calorie intake of subjects.