Discharging patients with personal consent signifies satisfaction with healthcare services. However, it can also pose a threat to patients' health, particularly concerning neonates, who are a sensitive and vulnerable population. In this study conducted during 2020 - 2021, the prevalence of neonatal discharge with personal consent was 24.96%, which was higher compared to similar studies in Nigeria (9.1%) (
4), Haiti (10%) (
18), and Saudi Arabia (1.6%) (
3). The most common reason for neonatal hospitalization in our study was jaundice, consistent with findings from a study by Roodpeyma and Hoseyni (
19). Other studies have indicated that sepsis was the most frequent diagnosis among neonates discharged with personal consent (
3,
4,
14,
20). The increased prevalence of neonatal discharge with personal consent in our study could be attributed to differences in study timing, and our data collection period coincided with the COVID-19 outbreak, leading to fears of infection that may have prompted early DAMA.
Additionally, the variation in reasons for hospitalization, with our study focusing on less severe conditions like jaundice compared to life-threatening conditions like sepsis in other studies, could contribute to this disparity. According to our findings, the primary reason for neonatal discharge with personal consent was related to family problems, followed by dissatisfaction with hospital performance, prolonged hospitalization, and financial constraints. This contrasts with most similar studies where economic issues significantly influenced parental decision-making, highlighting a notable difference in our results (
4,
14,
21). Staff misbehavior, frustration due to poor prognosis, lack of improvement in neonatal conditions, and inadequate facilities for parents were reported as reasons for discharge. However, in many studies, a high percentage of parents did not provide any reason (
11,
15,
20). The gender of the neonates studied did not significantly affect the reasons for discharge. Similarly, residency had no impact on the rate of early neonatal discharge in this study. In Pokhrel and Bhurtel study, neonates were term and of normal weight (
14), which was similar to our findings, suggesting these factors may influence parents' decision to DAMA. Additionally, according to the study by Onankpa, families who had natural childbirths were more inclined to discharge the baby with personal consent (
12), consistent with our findings.
Based on the results of this study, family problems, such as being a single parent, inability to have accompaniment at the hospital, having other young children at home, poor physical or medical conditions of the mother, and lack of family cooperation, were the most common cause of early discharge. When a family requests early discharge for neonates, it is necessary to investigate these factors and, if necessary, seek the assistance of a family counselor. To reduce the prevalence of DAMA, it is essential to increase awareness and knowledge in the community and improve communication between medical staff and parents.
Studies have indicated that DAMA status is affected when medical services are provided by the government or covered by health insurance. In this study, most discharged neonates were covered by insurance, suggesting that most medical services in this center are provided by the government. Therefore, it is crucial to communicate the results of this study to hospital authorities and the deputy director of treatment to minimize such cases through effective planning.
5.1. Suggestions
It is recommended that prospective studies be conducted to investigate the consequences of early discharge. Additionally, conducting similar studies with a multi-center approach involving the participation of private sectors would provide valuable insights.
5.2. Limitations
Despite the valuable information obtained from this research, we acknowledge some limitations inherent in retrospective studies. Medical files with incomplete information were excluded, and our data were limited to what was documented in the files. The inability to conduct long-term follow-ups of infants after discharge is another limitation of this study. Furthermore, it should be noted that the study period coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, and this situation undoubtedly influenced its results.
5.3. Conclusions
According to this research's results, the DAMA rate was higher than in other studies. This can be attributed to the timing of the research, which coincided with the COVID-19 outbreak, and the differences in causes of hospitalization. In this study, neonatal jaundice was the primary reason for hospitalization, which posed a lower risk compared to causes such as sepsis in other studies. The most common reason for DAMA was related to family problems, such as the presence of other children needing care at home, while financial problems were the least common. Therefore, efforts should be made to identify these cases and provide practical and preventive solutions to families to prevent endangering the safety of neonates. The fact that only a limited percentage consented to DAMA due to financial problems is indicative of acceptable insurance coverage within the system. However, given the importance of the issue, efforts should be made to minimize financial obstacles from influencing such decisions as much as possible. This research also underscores the need for the hospital supervisory system to emphasize the importance of recording more accurate information in medical files. Access to more data could lead to more valuable results and enable follow-up of neonates after DAMA.